論「兼愛」作為博雅之教的核心理念

Analysis of Northern Song Dynasty Surviving Minister Yuwen Xuzhong and Liberal Art in Mohism

蕭宏恩(Hung-En Hsiao)

墨學 ； 通識（博雅）教育 ； Mohism ； General Education (Liberal Arts)

漢學研究集刊

21期（2015 / 12 / 01）

45 - 61

繁體中文

通識或博雅教育在臺灣大專院校實施已有多年，而其思想之根基及實踐之思維仍在於西方由希臘“Liberal Art”之傳統。時至今日，仍處處滯礙而難以開展！更為嚴重的是，一直以來，「專業」與「通識」教育勢成二分且對立之態勢，涇渭分明，仍難見其消融之勢！難道中國傳統沒有所謂通識或博雅教育嗎？或是應該這麼說，中國傳統歷來的教育不就是今之所言之通識或博雅教育嗎？筆者以為，最能與當今通識或博雅教育理念相契合的中國傳統學問中，實以墨子之學為根基的墨家（或更好說「墨者團體」）的教育或學習。本文即企由墨學及墨者團體的教育與西方通識或博雅教育的對比，希冀建構適合於本土的通識或博雅教育之思想之根基及實踐之思維。

General Education has been brought into practice in universities in Taiwan for many years. The basic thoughts and practice of general education still stem from the tradition of Greek ＂Liberal Art.＂ Up to now, general education in Taiwan is still hard to be put into effect. What’s worse, there has been a dichotomy between ＂professional education＂ and ＂general education＂ since always, which is still entirely different nowadays. It’s a question-＂Is there no general education or liberal art in Chinese tradition?＂ We may think ＂Isn’t Chinese traditional education just nowadays general education or liberal art?＂ According to the researcher, the ways of education and study based on Chinese traditional Mohism meets the most closely with nowaday general education. This article attempts to construct the general education, whose basic thoughts and practice are suitable for Taiwan, by the contrast between the ways of education based on Mohism and western liberal art, in order to concretize the framework of general education.

1. Cross、謝明珊譯(2009)。課程秩序的綠洲：哥倫比亞學院的核心課程。臺北:韋伯文化。
2. Nussbaum、孫善豪譯(2010)。培育人文︰人文教育改革的古典辯護。臺北:政大出版社。
3. 吳進安(2003)。墨家哲學。臺北:五南圖書。
4. 李賢中(1999)。《墨經》中自然科學的思想方法。哲學雜誌，28，44-59。

1. 曾郁嫻(2022)。「運動中的性別」：運動與性別通識課程設計與教學實踐。臺大體育學報，43，53-65。