「內祖外聖」－越南客家人社區身份認同與融合之道：以同奈省邊和市龍寶區為研究對象

Craft masters' spirit under a Goddess' might: The struggles for identity and integration among the Hakka in Vietnam (Case study of Buu Long Region, Bien Hoa City, Dong Nai province)

阮玉詩(Nguyen Ngoc‐Tho)

客家人 ； 祖師 ； 覆蓋 ； 天后 ； 身份認同 ； 融合 ； Hakka ； craft master gods ； override ； Tianhou ； identity ； integration

漢學研究集刊

26期（2018 / 06 / 01）

135 - 156

繁體中文

當前越南有大概八十二萬華人，其中百分之九十五居住在南部地區。隨著歷史、社會環境的支配，華人社群區分為五大方言社區，包括廣東人、潮州人、福建人、客家人與海南人，各幫之間的語言、風俗、習慣均有不同之處。各社區在傳統信仰方面維持自己獨特的神明系列，其中天后與關公是全體華人共同信仰的神明。同奈省邊和市寶龍區客家人一開始不崇拜天后與關公，則供奉自己的祖師。此傳統使得寶龍客家人與其他華人社群持著一段距離，在其他華人的眼中，祖師信仰顯示未標準化的色彩。由於經濟、社會壓力的帶動，客家人把三祖師崇拜轉型成為有利於跨族群融合的天后信仰，其方式主要是在原來的祖師崇拜基礎上覆蓋上了天后聖母的表面話語。「內祖外聖」－轉型之後的天后信仰一直發揚，舊時的傳統果實沒有改變。作為活躍的知識分子，客家族群領袖為此轉型事項作出貢獻，其目的有二，一是跨華人社群融合，二為構建與維持客家人特色。此外，其轉型事項也滿足於本社群邁向越南當前社會的目標。本論文採用文化學中的標準化理論以及基於背景的解釋和重新解釋理論，來分析客家人的「信仰偽裝」現象，進而提出客家人對文化進化與跨境的前途作出討論。同時，本論文進一步探討各方的多邊互動和隱藏話語。

There are around 823.000 ethnic Chinese people in Vietnam, of which 95% are living in the South. Due to historical and social backgrounds, the dialectic groups (Cantonese, Hokkien, Hakka, Chaozhou and Hainanese) are quite distinct in term of dialects and popular traditions, and separate from each other. Each group maintains their own pantheon of gods and goddesses, in which the majorities come to worship Tianhou and Guan Di (or Guan Gong). The Hakkas in Buu Long (Bien Hoa city, Dong Nai province) are the one uniquely worshipping the craft master gods (祖師). This remarkably creates a challenging gap among the Chinese dialectic groups as well as discloses the heterodox nature in their own tradition under the eye-views of local standardized authority. Under sophisticated backgrounds and definitely serious pressures, the Hakka decided to transform the long-lasting craft masters worship into a more integrative model - the Tianhou cult, by overriding new cult on the surface. ＂Craft masters' spirit is under goddess' might＂, the open discourse has been wide-spreading although there have almost no significant change in either belief or practice. Remarkably, the transformation currently seems to be illogically managed and not to be stabilized. As a matter of fact, the local Hakka elites have brainstormed and implemented the change under the aims both cross-dialectic groups binding and identity preservation. Furthermore, they also struggle for an advanced and manageable integration process into the broader Vietnamese society. The research is to investigate the disguise to seek for the continuous efforts toward ＂evolving standardization＂ and solidarity binding through the charismatic efforts of the local Hakka elites, through which the research further discusses multilateral interaction and hidden discourses of the partners engaged.

1. Apter, David E.(ed.)(1964).Ideology and discontent.Glencoe, Illinois:Free Press.
2. Brown, Melissa(2002).Local Government Agency: Manipulating Tujia Identity.Modern China,28(3),362-395.
3. Choi, Byung Wook(2004).Southern Vietnam under the Reign of Minh Mạng (1820-1841): Central Policies and Local Response.Ithaca, NY:Southeast Asia Program Publications.
4. Dewey, John, The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action (Gifford Lectures 1929) (Minton, Balch, 1929).
5. Duara, Prasenjit(1988).Superscribing Symbols: The Myth of Guandi, the Chinese God of War.Journal of Asian Studies,47(4),778-95.
6. Durkheim, Emile(1995).The Elementary forms of religious life.NY:Free Press.
7. Faure, David(1999).The emperor in the village: representing the state in South China.State and Court Ritual in China,Cambridge:
8. Feuchtwang, Stephan(1992).The imperial metaphor: popular religion in China.New York:Routledge.
9. Feuchtwang, Stephan(1974).Domestic and communal worship in Taiwan.Religion and ritual in Chinese society,Stanford:
10. Freedman, Maurice(1974).Chinese lineage and society: Fukien and Kwangtung.London:Athlone Press.
11. Guo, Qitao(2003).Exorcism and Money: The Symbolic World of the Five-Fury Spirits in Late Imperial China.Berkeley:Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Center for Chinese Studies.
12. Huters, Theodore(ed.),Wong, R. Bin(ed.),Yu, Pauline(ed.)(1997).Culture and State in Chinese History. Conventions, Accommodations, and Critiques.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
13. Johnson,Nathan,Rawski(1985).Popular culture in late imperial China.Berkeley:University of California Press.
14. Jordan, David K.(1972).Gods, ghosts and ancestors: the folk religion of a Taiwanese village.University of California Press.
15. Katz, Paul R.(1995).Demon Hordes and Burning Boats: The Cult of Marshal Wen in Late Imperial Chekiang.Albany:State University of New York Press.
16. Katz, Paul R.(2007).Orthopraxy and Heteropraxy beyond the state-standardizing ritual in Chinese society.Modern China,33(1),72-90.
17. Mann, Michael(1970).The social cohesion of liberal democracy.American Sociological Review,35,423-439.
18. Pomeranz, Kenneth(2007).Orthopraxy, orthodoxy, and the Goddess(es) of Taishan.Modern China,33(1),22-46.
19. Sapir, Edward, "The emergence of the concept of personality in a study of culture", in Edward Sapir: Culture, Language and personality (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1934).
20. Sutton, Donald S.(2007).Introduction to the Special Issue: Ritual, Cultural Standardization, and Orthopraxy in China-reconsidering James L. Watson's ideas.Modern China,33(1),3-21.
21. Szonyi, Michael(1997).The illusion of standardizing the gods: the cult of the Five Emperors in late imperial China.Journal of Asian Studies,56(1),113-35.
22. Tsai, Maw-kuey(1968).Les Chinois au Sud-Vietnam.Paris:Bibliotheque Nationale.
23. Tu, Weiming(ed.)(1994).The Living Tree: the changing meaning of being Chinese today.Stanford, California:Stanford University Press.
24. von Glahn, Richard(2004).The Sinister Way: The Divine and the Demonic in Chinese Religious Culture.Berkeley:University of California Press.
25. Weller, Robert P.(1987).Unities and Diversities in Chinese Religion.London:Macmillan.
26. Wheeler, Charles(2015).Interests, institutions, and identity: strategic adaptation and the ethno-evolution of Minh Huong (Central Vietnam), 16th-19th centuries.Itinerario,39(1),141-166.
27. Wolf, Arthur(1974).Religion and Ritual in Chinese society.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
28. Yang, C.K.(1961).Religion in Chinese society: a study of contemporary social functions of religion and some of their historical factors.Berkeley:University of California Press.
29. 阮氏月(2015)。邊和市客家人廟宇與素食節。同奈出版社。
30. 阮玉詩(2017)。湄公河地區的天后信仰。國家政治出版社。
31. 阮玉詩(2017)。越南華人文化的解構與增權：以天后與關公為例。華僑與華人文獻，5
32. 周海(1992)。越南各華人社群。社會科學出版社。
33. 陶貞一(2016)。客住的勢力與南部的移民。文學會出版社。
34. 鄭懷德(1998)。嘉定城通志。河內:教育出版社。