元儒陳櫟《書集傳纂疏》對蔡沈《書集傳》的「羽翼」與「發明」

Chenli's auxiliary interpretation and innovation for Caishen's "Shu Ji Zhuan"

顧海亮(Hai-liang Gu)

陳櫟 ； 《書集傳纂疏》 ； 蔡沈 ； 《書集傳》 ； 羽翼 ； 發明 ； Chenli ； Shu Ji Zhuan Zhu Shu ； Caishen ； Shu Ji Zhuan ； Auxiliary interpretation ； Innovation

漢學研究集刊

35期（2022 / 12 / 01）

29+31 - 98

繁體中文;英文

元儒陳櫟《書集傳纂疏》乃宋元《書》學集成之作。陳櫟早年所撰《書解折衷》初步羽翼蔡沈《書集傳》，對其多有疑異駁正。延祐科考後撰《書集傳纂疏》在吸收《書解折衷》的基礎上，一仍早年治《書》理念，纂集、汲取宋元諸家《書》說，從釋訓詁、史實、地理、名物、制度、解章意等諸方面全面疏解《蔡傳》：或「考《蔡傳》之本」、或「闕《蔡傳》之疑」、或「論《蔡傳》之優」、或「補《蔡傳》之缺」、或「駁《蔡傳》之非」，說多有理有據，頗有真知灼見。其對《蔡傳》多有「羽翼發明」、「增益補闕」，並没有因為延祐科考《書》用《蔡傳》而改變其《書》學初衷。故四庫館臣所謂「是書之作乃於《蔡傳》有所増補，無所駁正，與其舊説迥殊」的說法，實屬未察。

Chenli, a Confucian scholar in the Yuan Dynasty, whose writings Shu Ji Zhuan Zuan Shu is the masterpiece of Shang Shu study in the Song and Yuan Dynasty. In the early years, Chenli wrote Shu Jie Zhe Zhong, preliminarily interpreted Caishen's Shu Ji Zhuan, doubting and criticizing it a lot. Cheli created Shu Ji Zhuan Zuan Shu after 1315, based on the absorption for Shu Jie Zhe Zhong, he still inherited his ideas for Shang Shu study. Specifically, Chenli has taken many scholars' opinions into account, interpreting Shu Ji Zhuan from many aspects, such as exegetics, history, geography, natural history, institution and the explanation for each chapter in Shang Shu. Sometimes he examines the root of Shu Ji Zhuan, sometimes he doubts Shu Ji Zhuan, sometimes he discuss the advantages of Shu Ji Zhuan, sometimes he criticizes Shu Ji Zhuan. His interpretations are reasonable, even insightful to some degree, such auxiliary interpretations have helped people understand Shu Ji Zhuan more deeply and deepen the understanding for Caishen's book. Therefore, Chenli does not change his original ideas for Shang Shu study although Shu Ji Zhuan has been adopted as the textbook in the imperial examination. To sum up, the editors of Complete Library of Four Branches of Books are not aware of Chenli's contribution for Shang Shu study, since they consider Shu Ji Zhuan Zuan Shu as only supplement for Shu Ji Zhuan, lacking of criticizing and correction, and it is totally different from what he has pointed out in his old book Shu Jie Zhe Zhong.

1. 許華峰(2012)。蔡沈《書集傳》所引據的資料分析。東華漢學，16，183-218。
   連結：
2. (1986).影印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
3. (1986).影印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
4. (1986).影印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
5. (1986).影印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
6. (1993).通志堂经解.揚州:廣陵書社.
7. （宋）朱熹,朱傑人（編）,嚴佐之（編）,劉永翔（編）(2002).朱子全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
8. （宋）朱熹,朱傑人（編）,嚴佐之（編）,劉永翔（編）(2002).朱子全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
9. （宋）朱熹,朱傑人（編）,嚴佐之（編）,劉永翔（編）(2002).朱子全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
10. （宋）蔡沈,錢宗武（整理）,錢忠弼（整理）(2010).書集傳.南京:鳳凰出版集團鳳凰出版社.
11. （清）永瑢(1982).四庫全書總目提要.北京:中華書局.
12. （漢）孔安國（傳）,（唐）孔穎達（疏）,廖名春（整理）,陳明（整理）(1999).尚書正義.北京:北京大學出版社.
13. （漢）鄭玄（注）,（唐）賈公彥（疏）,王文錦（整理）(1999).禮記正義.北京:北京大學出版社.
14. 許育龍(2011)。臺北，臺灣大學中國文學研究所。
15. 許華峰(1998)。論陳櫟《書解折衷》與《書蔡氏傳纂疏》對《書集傳》的態度──駁正《四庫全書總目》的誤解。元代經學國際研討會
16. 許華峰(2000)。臺北，中央大學中國文學研究所。
17. 許華峰(1998)。從陳櫟《定宇集》論其與董鼎《書傳輯錄纂注》的關係。中國文哲研究通訊，1998(2)，61-74。
18. 陳良中(2013).朱子尚書學研究.北京:人民出版社.
19. 楊芳(2016)。重慶，重慶師範大學。
20. 楊筠如(2005).尚書覈詁.西安:陜西人民出版社.
21. 顧頡剛,劉起釪(2018).尚書校釋譯論.北京:中華書局.

1. (2024)。理學範疇的《尚書》根據──以元儒陳櫟《書集傳纂疏》為中心的考察。中正漢學研究，43，39-80。