题名

從《詩家一指》的原貌論《二十四詩品》非司空圖撰

并列篇名

On That Ci-Kun Tu is Not the Author of Twenty-Four Pieces of Poetical Criticism

作者

呂正惠(Cheng-Hui Lu)

关键词

二十四品 ; 詩家一指 ; 虞侍書詩法 ; Twenty-Four Pieces of Poetical Criticism ; Shi Gia Yi Zhi ; Yu Ci Shu Shi Fa

期刊名称

淡江中文學報

卷期/出版年月

16期(2007 / 06 / 01)

页次

85 - 122

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

舊題司空圖《二十四詩品》,現已考知出自《詩家一指》。《詩家一指》另有一較早版本,名《虞侍書詩法》。本文將《虞侍書詩法》與《詩家一指》仔細對校,從文字以至全文結構,均可看出,《虞侍書詩法》全書結構完整、文字整鍊,其所持理論前後呼應,乃出自一人手筆,《二十四品》為其中一環。據此即可證明,《二十四品》絕非司空圖所作。

英文摘要

According to the recent study, it is sure that the so-called Ci-Kun Tu's Twenty-Four Pieces of Poetical Criticism(二十四詩品) comes from Shi Gia Yi Zhi(詩家一指). There is an earlier version of Shi Gia Yi Zhi, which is called Yu Ci Shu Shi Fa(虞侍書詩法). In this paper, by comparison in detail between Yu Ci Shu Shi Fa and Shi Gia Yi Zhi, we can see that the text of Yu Ci Shu Shi Fa is completed by one anonymous author because it is an concise and well-theorized work, and that the text of Twenty-Four Pieces of Poetical Criticism belongs to merely one part of Yu Ci Shu Shi Fa. By the evidence, I think that Ci-Kun Tu is absolutely not the author of Twenty-Four Pieces of Poetical Criticism.

主题分类 人文學 > 語言學
人文學 > 中國文學
人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. (1984)。宋金元文論選。人民文學出版社。
  2. 明許學夷(1987)。詩源辨體。人民文學出版社。
  3. 王運熙(2006)。中國古代文論管窺。上海古籍出版社。
  4. 張健(2001)。元代詩法校考。北京大學出版社。
  5. 陳尚君(2000)。陳尚君自選集。廣西師範大學出版社。
被引用次数
  1. 陳英傑(2015)。論「嚴羽劉辰翁詩論並稱」的基礎、背景和意義。清華中文學報,13,181-227。
  2. 李宜學(2011)。從元代詩法著作論李商隱詩在元代的接受情形。中正大學中文學術年刊,17,115-158。