题名

組織結構與教師行動的辯證關係:以一所小學為例

并列篇名

The Dialectical Relationship between Organizational Structure and Teachers' Agency: A Case Study in a Taiwanese Primary School

DOI

10.6769/JENCUE.200712.0103

作者

陳幸仁(Hsin-Jen Chen)

关键词

組織結構 ; 教師行動 ; 結構約制 ; 因應策略 ; 教師彰權益能 ; organizational structure ; teachers' agency ; structural constraint ; coping strategy ; teacher empowerment

期刊名称

彰化師大教育學報

卷期/出版年月

12期(2007 / 12 / 01)

页次

103 - 128

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

學校組織行爲研究很少從社會學理論來切入探討,更何況是從結構-行動的觀點作爲著力點。本研究藉由個案實地研究,一來驗證Giddens結構化理論中結構-行動的實徵關係的可能性,二來探討在教育職場中,主要是從組織結構的四種層面:時間、空間、規則、資源,來分析如何約制教師行動,而教師如何形成因應行動策略來回應結構約制力量。本研究採取質性研究途徑,以一所小學做爲個案學校進行探究。研究結果發現組織結構確實給予教師相當大的約制力量,使得教師表現出消極項應的因應行動策略。不過,個案學校教師會的成立,喚醒教師重視彰權益能的意識,形成一股集體力量,不僅抗衡結構約制力量,亦成爲促進學校組織變革的催化勢力。

英文摘要

Organizational behavior studies in schools have been paid little attention to the issue of structure-agency, as a way to investigate how organizational members interact. This research attempts to investigate the dialectical relationship between organizational structure and teachers' agency through empirical case study. The purposes of this study intend to examine the possibility of its empirical relationship between organizational structure and teachers' agency, which is the core of Giddens' structuration theory, on the one hand, and to concentrate upon whether teachers' agency is constrained by organizational structures through four elements: rules, resources, time and space on the other. In terms of methodology, this study employed the qualitative approach, selecting a primary school as the investigated site to explore the relationship between organizational structure and teachers' agency. The research findings illustrated that structures did pose constraints on teachers who in turn developed negative and adaptive coping strategies against structural constraints in school organizations. Yet, with the institution of the school-based teachers' association at the researched school, it woke up teachers' consciousness of empowerment, forming a collective force to resist against structural constraints. Most importantly, the school-based teachers' association became a facilitative source to promote school innovation and change.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 黃乃熒(2002)。以教師彰權益能觀點探究學校權力生態-以一所國中教評會爲例。師大學報(教育類),47(1),59-82。
    連結:
  2. 黃乃熒、曹芳齡(2003)。學校組織中集體協商運作之研究-以北部六縣市國民中學爲例。教育研究集刊,49(2),63-96。
    連結:
  3. 劉惠玲、王湘栗(2002)。從教師彰權益能角度談教學研究會的發展。實小學報,2,59-65。
    連結:
  4. Acker, S.(1999).The realities of teachers` work: Never a dull moment.London:Cassell.
  5. Adler, P. B.,Borys, B.(1996).Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive.Administrative Science Quarterly,41,61-89.
  6. Ashcraft, K. L.(2000).Empowering "professional" relationship.Management Communication Quarterly,13,347-392.
  7. Ball, S. J.(1987).The micropolitics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization.London:Methuen.
  8. Ball, S. J.(Ed.)(1990).Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge.London:Routledge.
  9. Bascia, N.(2000).The other side of the equation: Professional development and the organizational capacity of teacher unions.Educational Policy,14(3),385-404.
  10. Bascia, N.(1994).Unions in teachers` professional lives.New York:Teachers College Press.
  11. Bennett, H.,McClelland, V. A.,Varma, V. (Eds.)(1996).The Needs of teachers.London:Cassell.
  12. Blase, J.,Anderson, G.(1995).The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment.London:Cassell.
  13. Blase, J.,Blase, J.(1994).Empowering teachers: What successful school principals do.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  14. Bodgan, R. C.,Biklen, S. K.(2002).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
  15. Bruno, J. E.(1997).It's about time: Leading school reform in an era of time scarcity.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
  16. Bryant, C. G. A.,Jary, D.(Eds.)(1991).Giddens' theory of structuration: A critical appreciation.London:Routledge.
  17. Burgess, R. G.(1984).In the field: An introduction to field research.London:Routledge.
  18. Cicourel, A. V.(1981).Notes on the integration of micro-and macro-sociologies.Boston:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  19. Craib, I.(1992).Anthony Giddens.London:Routledge.
  20. Foucault, M.(1979).Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison.Harmondsworth:Penguin.
  21. Giddens, A.(1990).The consequences of modernity.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  22. Giddens, A.(1976).New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretive sociologies.London:Hutchins.
  23. Giddens, A.(1991).Modernity and self-identity.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  24. Giddens, A.(1979).Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis.London:Macmillan.
  25. Giddens, A.(1984).The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  26. Goffman, E.(1963).Behavior in public places.New York:Free Press.
  27. Goffman, E.(1972).Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior.London:Allen Lane.
  28. Gummesoson, E.(1991).Qualitative methods in management research.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  29. Hargreaves, A. (Eds.),Goodson, I.(1996).Teachers' professional lives.London:Falmer Press.
  30. Hokingson, C.(1996).Administrative philosophy: Values and motivations in administrative life.New York:Pergamon.
  31. Hoskin, K.,S. J. Ball (Ed.)(1990).Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge.London:Routledge.
  32. Hoy, W. K.,Miskel, C. G.(2001).Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice.Boston:McGraw-Hill.
  33. Hoyle, E.(1986).The politics of school management.London:Hodder & Stoughton.
  34. Hunter, C. ,P. Woods (ed.)(1980).Teacher strategies: Explorations in the sociology of the school.London:Croom Helm.
  35. Ironside, M.,Seifert, R.(1995).Industrial relations in schools.London:Routledge.
  36. Issacs, W.(2000).Dialogue and the use of art of thinking together: A pioneer approach to communication in business and in life.New York:Currency.
  37. Jansen, G.,Peshkin, A.,M. D. LeCompte,W. L. Millroy,J. Preissle (Eds.)(1992).The handbook of qualitative research in education.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
  38. Knight, B.(1989).Managing school time.Harlow, Essex:Longman.
  39. Kramer, R. M.,Tyler, T. R.(1996).Trust in organization: Frontiers of theory and research.London:Sage.
  40. Kreisberg, S.(1992).Transforming power: Domination, empowerment and education.Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
  41. Lather, P.(1986).Research as praxis.Harvard Education Review,56(3),257-275.
  42. Layder, D.(1994).Understanding social theory.London:Sage.
  43. Levi-Strauss, C.(1968).Structural anthropology.London:Allen Lane.
  44. Lukes, S.(1977).Essays in social theory.London:Macmillan.
  45. Marks, H. M.,Louis, K. S.(1999).Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning.Educational Administration Quarterly,35,707-750.
  46. Morgan, G.(1986).Images of organization.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
  47. Newton, T.,Handy, J.,Fineman, S(1995).Managing stress: emotion and power at work.London:Sage.
  48. O''Malley, J.,Davis, R. A. (Eds./Trans.)(1994).Marx: Early political writings.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  49. Pollard, A.(1985).The social word of the primary school.London:Cassell.
  50. Popkewitz, T. S.,Brennan, M.(1997).Restructuring of social and political theory in education: Foucault and a social epistemology of school practices.Educational Theory,47(3),287-314.
  51. Power, M.(1994).The audit explosion.London:Demos.
  52. Prasad, P.,Caproni, P.(1997).Critical theory in the management classroom: Engaging power, ideology, and praxis.Journal of Management Education,21(3),284-292.
  53. Robbins, S. P.(1993).Organizational behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  54. Sarason, S. B.(1995).School change: The personal development of a point of view.New York:Teachers College Press.
  55. Schilling, C.,C. G. A. Bryant,D. Jary (Eds.)(1997).Anthony Giddens: critical assessments.London:Routledge.
  56. Schutz, A.(1967).Collected papers.Hague:Mouton.
  57. Troman, G.,Woods, P.(2001).Primary teachers` stress.London:RoutledgeFalmer.
  58. Turner, J. H.(1991).The structure of sociological theory.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
  59. Weber, M.(1978).Economy and society.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  60. Webster, W. G.(1985).Effective collective bargaining in public education.Ames, IA:Iowa Sate University Press.
  61. Woods, P.(1990).Teacher skills and strategies.Basingstoke, Hampshire:Falmer Press.
  62. Woods, P.(1996).Researching the art of teaching: Ethnography of educational use.London:Routledge.
  63. Woods, P.(1986).Inside school: Ethnography in educational research.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  64. Woods, P.,S. J. Ball (Ed.)(2000).Sociology of education: Major themes.London:Routledge.
  65. Yukl, G. A.(1994).Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  66. 王瑞賢(1999)。國小每日生活時間的實踐邏輯。教育研究資訊,7(2),37-46。
  67. 洪孟華(2003)。教師「增權賦能」(empowerment)概念與策略之探析-專業主義的觀點。中等教育,54(5),84-95。
  68. 胡幼慧主編(1999)。質性研究:理論、方法與本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
  69. 莊文瑞(1997)。校園的知識/權力分析。東吳哲學學報,2,197-207。
  70. 陳瑞惠(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
  71. 彭富源(2000)。校園權力結構重組中「教師會」角色的分析-期待與實際的差距及融通。台灣教育,594,47-53。
  72. 黃宗顯(1999)。學校行政對話研究-組織中影響力行爲的微觀探討。台北:五南。
  73. 黃瑞琴(1991)。質的教育研究方法。台北:心理。
  74. 黃錦山(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義,國立中正大學成人暨繼續教育研究所。
  75. 魏宗明(2002)。由Foucault觀點談學校內的規訓實務。國民教育研究學報,8,183-204。
被引用次数
  1. Liang, Chin-Tu(2017).Teachers' Cognitive Processes from the Perspective of Distributed Cognition: An Analysis Focused on Teachers-Made Assessments.教育研究與發展期刊,13(4),85-118.
  2. 侯世昌、林志興(2015)。教師與學校行政人員互動的微觀政治素養研究。嘉大教育研究學刊,35,63-104。
  3. 簡宏江、陳儒晰(2014)。幼教人員數位行政建設對數位行政績效的影響:數位實用價值與數位專業表現的中介作用。學校行政,90,85-107。
  4. 梁金都(2009)。以Freire對話行動理論觀點對教育改革之批判與省思。教育科學期刊,8(2),21-35。
  5. 梁金都(2010)。國小代課教師文化之研究。屏東教育大學學報,34(教育),1-34。
  6. (2010)。組織結構與利害關係人策略行動的辨證關係:以一所偏遠小學發展學校特色為例。教育經營與管理研究集刊,6,51-85。