「通識與專業課程統整」：一所專校護理科的實施模式與教師改變

Curriculum Integration between General and Specialized Education: The Case of a Nursing Department in a Junior College and Teachers' Change Involved

10.6769/JENCUE.201206.0049

洪慧真(Hui-Chen Hung)；洪志成(Chih-Cheng Hung)

護理專業 ； 通識教育 ； 課程統整 ； 教師改變 ； nursing profession ； general education ； curriculum integration ； teacher change

彰化師大教育學報

21期（2012 / 06 / 01）

49 - 73

繁體中文

通識教育與專業教育過去多為平行關係，課程設計相互獨立，顯少能有進一步的聯結與統整。然而當課程改革朝向以培養學生能力為方向後，跨學科或跨領域的課程統整成為一種可能達成目標的方法。本文旨在探究關懷專校（化名）護理科實施通識與專業課程統整的模式與其所帶來的教師改變。採質性研究方法，共20位教師為參與對象，蒐集資料包含焦點團體討論逐字稿、通識與專業課程統整表、教師觀察札記及非正式訪談記錄等。運用開放編碼分析資料，結果發現學校開展出專業教育融入通識教育的課程統整，乃經由發展「專業核心能力為導向的課程統整模式」而促成，此模式透過三種方式實施：護理專業實務情境融入通識課程、強化可統整兩科之單元或增加特定單元教學時數、發展外加式自由參與的非正式課程等。個案教師則呈現不同程度的改變，包含：在既有的課程內容中配合統整、運用已具備之能力創新開發新單元、探索可統整的知識與自主學習教學。最後提出省思及未來可研究議題如：課程統整所需平等、開放、尊重的氛圍為何？通識與專業課程統整比例調配如何較為適切？

The curriculum design between general education and that of specialized education program tend to separated from each other. When the curriculum reforms in higher education call for competence-oriented, cross-disciplinary integration becomes an useful option. The purpose of this study was to explore the model of the above integration in CaRing Junior College and teachers' change involved. Based on a qualitative approach, 20 teachers from either general education or specialized education programs participated in this study. Focus group discussion transcripts, integrated-curriculum tables, non-formal interviewing records and observing journals were collected and analyzed with open coding. The results showed that the specialized education integrated into general education was formed by developing ”core competence-oriented curriculum integration model.” Three versions of above integration were found, including the approach that implemented through added nursing context into general curriculum, an approach of gradually involving nursing topics into original curriculum or added extra teaching hours of specific units, and an approach of developing additional optionally participated extra curriculum. There are three types of teacher change identified, including firstly, teacher coordination within the original curriculum of general education remaining unchanged and with resources available; secondly, by intuitively developing new units which link the topics between general and nursing programs; the lastly, exploring relative knowledge which could be integrated into their curriculum and learning to teach automatically. Finally, through reflections, the study raised some research issues, including what would be an equal, respective and open-minded context like for both departments which are ready to initiate the curriculum integration? To what extent is the best way to balance the two curriculum topics involved in the integration process?

1. 林俊傑、蔡俊傑(2008)。國小九年一貫健康與體育學習領域課程統整教學之探討─以「2008 北京奧運」主題為例。體育學系（所）刊，8，87-98。
   連結：
2. 高美英、呂碧鴻、褚齡霙(2004)。台灣當前醫學人文課程之實施現況與推展困境。醫學教育，8(4)，392-403。
   連結：
3. 黃騰、歐用生(2009)。失去的信任能找回來嗎？一個關於教師與改革的故事。課程與教學季刊，12(2)，161-192。
   連結：
4. 蘇恆安(2006)。美國大學餐旅教育通識課程的角色與份量：借鏡與省思。餐旅暨家政學刊，3(3)，377-390。
   連結：
5. 郭為藩（2006）。知識社會的通識教育課程。通識在線電子報第四期 2006 年8 月5日發刊。2010 年6 月10 日取自http://www.chinesege.org.tw/geonline/epaper/zhtw/epaper4-06.html
6. Beane, J. A.(1997).Curriculum Integration.New York:Teachers College, Columbia University.
7. Beane, J. A.、周珮儀譯、林佩璇譯、陳美如譯、王秀玲譯、游家政譯、蔡清田譯、游進年譯(2000)。課程統整。台北:學富文化。
8. Boyle, B.,While, D.,Boyle, T.(2004).A longitudinal study of teacher change: what makes professional development effective?.The Curriculum Journal,15(1),46-68.
9. Clarke, D.,Hollingsworth, H.(2002).Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth.Teaching and Teacher Education,18(8),947-967.
10. Dowdwn, T.(2007).Relevant, challenging, integrative and exploratory curriculum design: Perspectives from theory and practice for middle level schooling in Australia.The Australian Educational Researcher,34(2),51-71.
11. Fogarty, R.(1991).How to integrate the curricula.Arlington Heights. Illinois:IRI/Skylight training and publishing.
12. Fullan, M.(Ed.),Haregreaves, A.(Ed.)(1992).Teacher development and educational change.London:The Falmer Press.
13. Jacobs, H. H.(1989).Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation.Alexandria:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14. Kelly, P.(2006).What is teacher learning: A social-culture perspective.Oxford Review of Education,32(4),505-519.
15. MacMath, S.,Roberts, J.,Wallace, J.,Chi, X.(2010).Curriculum integration and at-risk students: a Canadian case study examining student learning and motivation..British Journal of Special Education,37(2),87-94.
16. Opfer, V. D.,Pedder, D. G.,Lavicza, Z.(2011).The role of teachers' orientation to learning in professional development and change: A national study of teachers in England.Teaching and Teacher Education,27,443-453.
17. Park, M.(2008).Implementing curriculum integration: The experiences of Korean elementary teachers.Asia Pacific Education Review,9(3),308-319.
18. Penlington, C.(2008).Dialogue as a catalyst for teacher change: A conceptual analysis.Teaching and Teacher Education,24,1304-1316.
19. Pinar, W. F.(2006).The synoptic text today and other essays: Curriculum development after the reconceptualization.New York, NY:Peter Lang Publishing, Inc..
20. Strauss, A. L.,Corbin, J. M.(1998).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
21. Wallace, J.,Sheffield, R.,Rennie, L.,Venville, G.(2007).Looking back, looking forward: Re-searching the conditions for curriculum integration in the middle years of schooling.The Australian Educational Researcher,34(2),29-49.
22. Zhou, G.,Kim, L.(2010).Impact of an integrated methods course on preservice teachers' perspectives of curriculum integration and faculty instructors' professional growth..Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education,10(2),123-138.
23. 尹弘颷、李子建(2008)。課程變革─理論與實踐。台北:高等教育。
24. 李隆生、王葳(2009)。學通識教育和商管專業教育的現況─兼論兩者的互補與綜效。實踐博雅學報，11，50-77。
25. 周淑卿(2004)。我是課程發展的專業人員？─教師專業身分認同的分析。教育資料與研究，57，9-16。
26. 徐振雄(2009)。科技與社會（STS）融入通識課程的規劃與教學實踐：以萬能科技大學「從本土環境保護意識解析科技發展下蛻變的環境價值」STS 計劃為例。通識教育學刊，3，37-65。
27. 桂齊遜(2002)。通識教育教學理念與課程規劃方針─以元培科技學院核心通識課程為例。通識研究集刊，2，55-69。
28. 莊明貞編(2004)。課程改革─反省與前瞻。臺北市:高等教育。
29. 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。
30. 陳政宏(2010)。大學課程之重新分類：擺脫通識與專業課程二分法的問題。教育研究與發展期刊，6(3)，257-288。
31. 黃俊傑(2007)。二十一世紀的大學專業教育與通識教育：互動與融合。通識學刊：理論與實務，1(2)，1-28。
32. 黃政傑(1991)。以科技整合促進課程統整。教師天地，52，38-43。
33. 黃榮村、廖述盛(2007)。技職教育通識教育的理論與實務。高教技職簡訊，2007(9.10)
34. 楊惠芳、楊芬林(2010)。教育優先計畫發展學校特色之研究：以一輪車教學之課程統整設計為例。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，9(2)，242-256。
35. 甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務─解構與建構。台北:高等教育。
36. 歐用生(2010)。課程研究新視野。台北:師大書苑。
37. 蔡敏玲(1994)。教育民族誌中研究者的角色。八十三年度中央研究院民族學研究所「社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻」第二次科技研討會，台北:
38. 蔡清田(2004)。課程統整與行動研究。台北:五南。
39. 錢富美(2008)。國小職前教師社會領域課程統整設計與教學實例之研究。社會科教育研究，13，245-263。
40. 簡成熙(2004)。教育哲學─理念、專題與實務。台北:高等教育。
41. 蘇金豆(2003)。知識經濟時代技職專業教育與通識教育綜合化之探究。通識研究集刊，3，1-10。