以創造思考行動策略幫助國小師資生創作社會學習領域教學遊戲之行動研究

An Action Research on Guiding Pre-service Teachers to Design Games with Creative Thinking Strategies in the Teaching of Social Studies

10.6769/JENCUE.201206.0075

白雲霞(Yun-Hsia Pai)

社會學習領域 ； 遊戲教學 ； 創造力 ； 創造思考教學 ； 師資生 ； social studies ； game teaching ； creativity ； creative teaching ； pre-service teachers

彰化師大教育學報

21期（2012 / 06 / 01）

75 - 106

繁體中文

近年來社會學習領域融入更多元的教學方法豐富學習，許多社會學習領域教師常使用遊戲來進行教學、遊戲評量等方式進行課堂，而遊戲教學也被許多研究證實能有效引起學生學習動機，但反觀社會科學習領域之教學遊戲卻鮮少被開發，是故，本研究欲藉由創造思考之行動策略來幫助師資生創作社會學習領域教學遊戲，同時瞭解其創作教學遊戲的歷程及其對教學遊戲創作的看法。本研究採行動研究法，並在其中透過觀察、文件分析及深入晤談法蒐集資料並加以分析。本研究結論如下：（一）社會學習領域的遊戲創意發想對師資生的助益為：1.讓師資生瞭解遊戲在教學中的效益；2.有助於師資生對創造思考策略的運用、教學信念以及自我概念；3.師資生瞭解教學創作應考量使用者的需求與身心發展情形。（二）師資生創作社會學習領域遊戲最大的困難在於遊戲的連貫性與統整性、如何產生完整清楚的遊戲規則與課室教學的秩序管理。（三）師資生較常使用的創造思考技術為腦力激盪法、聯想法、淘汰法、六w檢討法、重組法、檢核表技術、缺點列舉法與希望列舉法。（四）師資生較常需要教師提醒或引導才使用的創思技巧為：習慣改變法、屬性列舉法、分合法、強力組合法。

In recent years, social studies teachers have incorporated various teaching methods in interesting and engaging ways; for example, games can serve as teaching activities and assessments for facilitating learning. Moreover, the effects of games as class activities to increase students' learning motivation have been proved positive in numerous studies; however, this teaching methodology has been undervalued in social studies teaching. This research aims to guide pre-service teachers to design games in social studies classes through the use of creative strategies. Pre-service teachers were asked to apply their game teaching projects in practice and then revise them based on the feedbacks of practical teaching. Data were collected on classroom observations, document analysis and in-depth interviews. The results of this study suggest the benefits of using creative strategies to apply games in social studies teaching. It also reveals some difficulties that pre-service teachers encountered while designing games. It is found that the most commonly used creative strategies while designing games in social studies classes are brainstorming, associating, eliminating, 5W1H thinking, random organizing, checking listing, disadvantage listing and advantage listing. Besides, through this project, the pre-service teachers have a greater understanding of positive effects of game teaching. This study not only helps pre-service teachers use creative strategies in designing teaching games, but also enhances their teaching beliefs and self-concept. It is worth noting that pre-service teachers need more instructions and guidance while designing game teaching through some creative methodologies such as the example of habit, attribute list, synectics and forced relationships.

1. 柯志恩(2004)。融合後設認知之創造思考教學方案在師資培育課程之應用。新竹師院學報，19，13-43。
   連結：
2. 張國綱、曹宗萍(2004)。職前教師對創意數學課程之學習。教育科學期刊，4(2)，95-117。
   連結：
3. 張蕙芬、陳龍安(2010)。幼兒語文創造思考教學方案成效之研究。特殊教育學報，31，85-111。
   連結：
4. 蕭顯勝、洪琬諦、伍建學(2009)。以網路遊戲實施科技創造力教學之研究。藝術學報，84，93-116。
   連結：
5. 彭增龍、陳麗華、單文經（2003）。風華再現洲子灣，社會行動取向課程與教學─社區行動篇。（教學錄影帶）。臺北：國立教育資料館。
6. Alessi, S. M.,Trollip, S. R.(1985).Computer-based instruction: Methods and development.Englewood Cliffs. NJ:Prentice-Hall.
7. Anderson, F. E.(1992).Art for all the children: Approaches to art therapy for children with disabilities.Illinois:Thomas.
8. Beck, C.,Kosnik, C.(2000).Associate teachers in pre-service education: Clarifying and enhancing their role.Journal of Education for Teaching,26(3),207-24.
9. Bolden, D. S.,Harries, T. V.,Newton, D. P.(2010).Pre-service primary teachers' conceptions of creativity in mathematics.Educational Studies in Mathematics,73(2),143-157.
10. Buaraphan, K.,Sung-ong, S.(2009).Thai pre-service science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science.Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,10(1),Article 4.
11. Crawford, R. P.(1954).Techniques of creative thinking.New York:Hawthom.
12. Crow, B.(2008).Changing conceptions of educational creativity: A study of student teachers' experience of musical creativity.Music Education Research,10(3),373-388.
13. Davis, G. A.(1986).Creativity is forever.Dubuque, IA:Kendall/Hunt.
14. Dempsey, J. V.,Rasmussen, K.,Lucassen. B.(1994).Instructional gaming: Implication for instructional technology.Annual Meeting of Association for Educational Communications and Technology,Nashville:
15. Dick, W.,Carey, L.,Carey, J.(2001).The systematic design of instruction.New York:Longman.
16. Durmus, S.,Bicak, B.(2006).A scale for mathematics and mathematical values of pre-service teachers.International conference on the teaching of mathematics
17. Eow, Y. L.,Ali, W. Z.,Mahmud, R.,Baki, R.(2010).Computer games development and appreciative learning approach in enhancing students' creative perception.Computers & Education,54(1),146-161.
18. Feezel, J. D.(1993).Preparing teachers through creativity games.Joint Meeting of the Southern States Communication Association and the Central States Communication Association
19. Gendrop, S. C.(1996).Effect of an intervention in synectics on the creative thinking of nurses..Creativity Research Journal,9(1),11-20.
20. Howard-Jones, P. A.(2008).Co-constructing an understanding of creativity in drama education that draws on neuropsychological concepts.Educational Research,50(2),187-201.
21. Huang, Y. C.(2006).Student teachers' beliefs about creativity at Buffalo.教育研究與發展期刊,2(2),181-201.
22. Koray, Ö.(2005).Students' perceptions about using six thinking hats and attribute listing techniques in the science course.Educational Administration: Theory & Practice,43,379-400.
23. Li, Q.(2010).Digital game building: Learning in a participatory culture.Educational Research,52(4),427-443.
24. Liebmann, M.(1991).Art therapy for groups: A hand book of themes, games and exercises.London:Routledge.
25. Liebmann, M.(1994).Art therapy with offenders.London:Jessica Kingsley.
26. Malone, T. W.(1981).Toward a theory in intrinsically motivating instruction.Cognitive Science,4,333-369.
27. Malone, T. W.(1982).Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interface: Lessons from computer games.Proceedings of the 1st Major Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems,Gaitherburg, Maryland, USA:
28. Maslow, A. H.(1968).Toward a psychology of being.Princeton, NJ:D. Van Nostrand.
29. Newton, D.(2009).Some student teachers' conceptions of creativity in school science.Research in Science & Technological Education,27(1),45-60.
30. Piaget, J.(1962).Play, dreams and imitation in childhood.New York:W. W. Norton.
31. Seng, S.(1998).Teaching thinking skills for pre-service and in-service teachers in Singapore.International conference on critical thinking and educational reform,Zamboanga, Philippines:
32. Simonton, D. K.(1988).Scientific genius: A psychology of science.Cambridge University Press.
33. Smith-Shank, D. L.(1993).Beyond this point there be dragons: Pre-service elementary teachers' stories of art and education.Art Education,46(5),45-51.
34. Smogorzewska, J.(2012).Storyline and associations pyramid as methods of creativity enhancement: Comparison of effectiveness in 5-year-old children.Thinking Skills and Creativity,7(1),28-37.
35. Sousa, F. C.(2007).Teachers' creativity and effectiveness in higher education: perceptions of students and faculty.Quality of Higher Education,4,21-37.
36. Terrell, S.,Rendulic, P.(1996).Using computer-managed instructional software to increase motivation and achievement in elementary school children.Journal of Research on Computing in Education,26(3),403-414.
37. Usuki, M.(2001).Metacognitive awareness in JSL/JFL teacher education: from learner autonomy towards teacher autonomy.Annual IALS Symposium for Language Teacher Educators,Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom:
38. 白雲霞(2008)。創思教學法在師資培育的應用。E世代師資培育研討會論文集
39. 李駱遜(1996)。以遊戲為「生活課程」教學途徑之研究。國教學報，18，125-158。
40. 李咏吟(1985)。教學原理。台北:遠流。
41. 侯禎塘、李香慧、林小玲、張乃悅、黃小芳(2005)。融合教育環境中的數學遊戲教學實踐與省思。
42. 張玉成、教育部教育計畫小組編(1983)。教師發問技巧及對學生創造思考能力影響之研究。台北市:教育部教育計畫小組。
43. 張家琳、王崇名(2009)。網路遊戲對於國小學童創造力情意表現的影響研究。國民教育，49(4)，85-96。
44. 張振成(2000)。創造思考教學與創造力的培養。創造思考教育，10，5-8。
45. 莊維貞、張淑真(2007)。論小學英語遊戲教學。英語教育電子月刊，33
46. 陳龍安(1997)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理出版社。
47. 陳龍安(1990)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所。
48. 陳龍安(2000)。創造思考教學。台北:師大書苑。
49. 陳麗華、彭增龍、王鳳敏(2003)。社會行動取向課程設計的理念與實踐。教育資料與研究，54，1-17。
50. 黃秀珍、賴阿福(2005)。資訊科技融入國小低年級生活課程創造思考教學之研究。臺北市2005數位學習選粹，台北市:
51. 黃炳煌編(2002)。社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略。臺北市:師大書苑。
52. 黃嬿樺、賴慶三(2009)。科學玩具遊戲教學對國小三年級學童「空氣」單元學習的影響。科學教育，318，2-16。
53. 詹志禹(2002)。,台北市:教育部。
54. 賴慶三、王錦銘(2010)。科學玩具遊戲教學對國小五年級學生學習成效之研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，56，29-52。

1. 蕭佳純(2019)。國內運用創造力教學模式對學生創造力影響之後設分析。特殊教育研究學刊，44(3)，93-120。