從新制度主義文化認知取向評析教育改革之困境

Evaluating the Predicament of Educational Reform from the Perspective of Culture-Cognitive of New Institutionalism

張源泉(Yuan-Chuan Chang)

新制度主義 ； 文化認知 ； 教育改革 ； New institutionalism ； Culture-Cognitive ； Educational reform

彰化師大教育學報

28&29期（2016 / 06 / 01）

81 - 102

繁體中文

從教育史發展觀之，各種致力於教育改革的舉措幾乎從未停歇，但教育體制之實質變革卻少之又少；本文透過文件分析法，從新制度主義之分析視角嘗試對前述問題進行解釋。在行文次序上，先探究傳統思維對於教育改革困境的解釋，而後闡釋新制度主義之崛起脈絡及其分類，並從該視角闡釋教育改革的困境。最後本文提出，組織皆依存於特定組織域，學校做為組織亦然，且受制於「制度邏輯」之約束；任何深層次之變革必然會觸及制度邏輯，但後者具有高度的穩定性，因為其為組織域中各方相關者所共同建構，所以單方面變革難以奏效，甚且制度邏輯具有防禦機制而使其迴避理性質疑，再者因個體常無法意識到制度邏輯之影響，而使其亦難以被糾正，亦使得教育改革的推動舉步維艱。本文僅先探詢改革的困境，至於改革者的能動性與制度變革之相關問題，希冀未來再做進一步探究。

An overview of the history of education shows that, despite much effort over a long period of time, educational systems are not very amenable to reform. Utilizing document analysis, in this paper I adopt the perspective of new institutionalism to investigate the difficulties encountered while attempting to implement educational reform. After examining the traditional views on the dilemma of educational reform I proceed to present the perspective of new institutionalism and its interpretation of this issue. Finally, I propose that inasmuch as schools belong to a specific organizational field, and are subject to the constraints of the organizational logic governing that field, any complex reforms will necessarily touch upon this organizational logic, which, however, is highly resistant to change, due to its being an integral part of the organizational field. This is why single-facet reform tends to yield such meager results. Educational reform is also hampered by defense mechanisms which arise out of the institutional logic and serve to deflect rational criticism, as well as the general inscrutability of the influence of institutional logic. In this paper I focus on describing the overall dilemma of educational reform, and hope to take up related issues, such as the role of reformers, in a future paper.

1. 王震武、林文瑛(1998)。傳統與現代華人的「士大夫觀念」─階級社會的素樸本土心理學分析。本土心理學研究，10，119-164。
   連結：
2. 楊朝祥(2014)。十二年國民基本教育：政策爭議與對策。教育資料與研究，115，1-26。
   連結：
3. 齊偉先(2012)。現代社會「教改」論述的演變及其發展的結構性條件：以台灣暨德國的教改論述為例。台灣社會研究季刊，88，89-126。
   連結：
4. 顏學誠(2014)。教育與社會秩序：解析升學主義。教育實踐與研究，37(1)，121-144。
   連結：
5. 高詩琴、林秀姿（2014 年12 月28 日）。吳思華、柯文哲對嗆12 年國教。聯合報，A1 版。
6. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Glencoe: Free Press.
7. 教育部統計處（2015）。大專校院學校數。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/important/OVERVIEW_U02.XLS
8. 湯雅雯（2009 年7 月13 日）。撕掉考卷，千人高喊12 年國教。聯合報，AA4 版。
9. 教育部（2015）。12 年國教：推動沿革。取自http://tr.ilvs.ilc.edu.tw/~refine/12y/12y-5.htm
10. 陳智華（2014 年12 月29 日）。教部解藥給半副，解決不了爭議。聯合報，A8 版。
11. 周志豪（2014 年12 月1 日）。胡志強：九合一判馬「政治死刑」。聯合報，A3 版。
12. 吳思萍、陳雨鑫、林秀姿（2014 年8 月22 日）。雙北續招亂象，校長哭、家長罵、學生苦。聯合報，A6 版。
13. 王彩鸝（2009 年7 月9 日）。家長周日上街頭，「不要基測，給孩子快樂國教」。聯合晚報，A12 版。
14. Roth, D. (2014). The Johnson administration and the great society. Retrieved from http://www.nal.usda.gov/ric/ricpubs/rural_development_chap5.pdf
15. Powell, W. W. & Bromley, P. (2013). New institutionalism in the analysis of complex organizations. Retrieved from http://www.patriciabromley.com/PowellBromleyEncyclopedia.pdf
16. 張錦弘（2013 年12 月27 日）。十大教育新聞 12 年國教變調居冠。聯合報，AA6 版。
17. Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: Wiley.
18. Archer, M. S.(1984).Social origins of educational systems.CA:Sage.
19. Ball, S. J.(1997).Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research.British Educational Research Journal,23(1),257-274.
20. Bentley, T. D.(2000).Change strategies utilized in rural Alaskan schools when implementing an innovation.Montana:Montana State University.
21. Berger, P. L.,Kellner, H.(1981).Sociology interpreted: An essay on method and vocation.Garden City:Doubleday Anchor.
22. Bourdieu, P.(1991).Language and symbolic power.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
23. Bourdieu, P.(1990).The logic of practice.Cambridge:Polity Press.
24. Bourdieu, P.(1993).The field of cultural production.Cambridge, MA:Polity Press.
25. Bourdieu, P.,Passeron, J.-C.(1977).Reproduction in education, society, and culture.London:Sage.
26. Boyd, W. L.(2000).The "R's of school reform'' and the politics of reforming of replacing public schools.Journal of Educational Change,1(4),219-251.
27. Brinton, M.,Nee, V.(2000).The new institutionalism in sociology.CA:Stanford University Press.
28. Calhoun, C.(1994).Social theory and the politics of identity.Oxford:Blackwell.
29. Chubb, J. E.,Moe, T. M.(1997).Politics, markets, and the organization of schools.New York:Oxford University Press.
30. Clemens, E. S.,Cook, J. M.(1999).Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change.Annual Reviews of Sociology,25,441-466.
31. Collins, R.(1979).The credential society.New York:Academic Press.
32. Connelly, F. M.,Clandinin, D. J.(1999).Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educational practice.NY:Teachers College Press.
33. Cuban, L.(2001).Can historians help school reformers?.Curriculum Inquiry,31(4),453-466.
34. Darling-Hammond, L.(1992).Reframing the school reform agenda.The School Administrator,4(9),20-24.
35. Datnow, A.(2002).Can we transplant educational reform and does it last?.Journal of Educational Change,3,215-239.
36. DiMaggio, P. J.,Powell, W. W.(1983).The Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160.
37. DiMaggio, P. J.,Powell, W. W.(1991).The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
38. Dunn, W. N.(2004).Public policy analysis: An introduction.NJ:Pearson Prentice Hall.
39. Durkheim, E.(1956).Education and sociology.New York:Free Press.
40. Durkheim, E.(1977).The evolution of educational thought: Lectures on the formation and development of secondary education in France.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
41. Fischer, F.(2003).Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
42. Fischer, F.(Ed.),Forester, J.(Ed.)(1993).The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning.Durhan:Duke University Press.
43. Friendland, R.,Alford, R. R.(1991).Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
44. Fullan, M. G.(1991).The new meaning of educational change.New York:Teachers College Press.
45. Hall, P.,Taylor, R.(1996).Political science and three institutionalism.Political Studies,44(5),936-957.
46. Hanson, M.(2001).Institutional theory and educational change.Educational Administration Quarterly,37(5),637-661.
47. Hudson, J.,Lowe, S.(2004).Understanding the policy process.Bristol:Policy Press.
48. Levinson, B. A. U.,Sutton, M.(2001).Policy as practice: Toward a comparative socio-cultural analysis of educational policy.London:Ablex Publishing.
49. Lichbach, M. I.(Ed.),Zuckerman, A. S.(Ed.)(1997).Comparative politics.New York:Cambridge University Press.
50. Lieberman, R. C.(2002).Ideas, institutions and political order: Explaining political change.The American Political Science Review,96,697-712.
51. Lindner, J.(2003).Institutional stability and change: Two sides of the same coin.Journal of European Public Policy,10(6),912-935.
52. Luhmann, N.(1982).The differentiation of society.New York:Columbia University Press.
53. Luhmann, N.(2002).Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft.Frankfurt/a. M.:Suhrkamp Verlag.
54. Luhmann, N.(1997).Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft.Frankfurt/a. M.:Suhrkamp Verlag.
55. Luhmann, N.(1995).Die Kunst der Gesellschaft.Frankfurt/a. M.:Suhrkamp Verlag.
56. Mahoney, J.,Thelen, K. A.(2010).Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power.New York:Cambridge University Press.
57. Manasse, L.(1985).The principal as change facilitator, Bulletin 1753.Louisiana:Louisiana State Department of Education.
58. March, J. G.(Ed.)(1965).Handbook of organizations.New York:Rand McNally.
59. March, J. G.,Olsen, J. P.(1989).A sociological critique: The organizational basis of politics.New York:Free Press.
60. March, J. G.,Olsen, J. P.(1984).The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life.American Political Science Review,78(3),734-749.
61. March, J. G.,Olsen, J. P.(1989).Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics.New York:Free Press.
62. Mawhinney, H. B.(1996).The new focus on institutions and the reinvention of schooling.London:Falmer Press.
63. Meyer, J. W.(Ed.),Scott, W. R.(Ed.)(1983).Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality.London:Sage.
64. Meyer, J. W.,Rowan, B.(1978).The structure of educational organizations.San Francisco:Jossey Bass Publishers.
65. Moran, M.(Ed.),Rein, M.(Ed.),Goodin, R. E.(Ed.)(2006).The oxford handbook of public policy.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
66. Ogawa, R. T.,Crowson, R. L.,Goldring, E. B.(1999).Enduring dilemmas of school organization.San Francisco:Jossey Bass Publishers.
67. Parsons, T.(1960).Structure and process in modern societies.New York:Free Press.
68. Powell, W. W.(Ed.),DiMaggio, P. J.(Ed.)(1991).The new institutionalism in organizational analysis.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
69. Prestine, N. A.(Ed.),Thurston, P. W.(Ed.)(1994).Advances in educational administration.Greenwich:JAI Press.
70. Reich, S.(2000).The four faces of institutionalism: Public policy and pluralism perspective.Governance,13(4),501-522.
71. Rowan, B.,Miskel, C. G.(1999).Institutional theory and the study of educational organizations.San Francisco:Jossey Bass Publishers.
72. Rusch, E. A.(2005).Institutional barriers to organizational learning in school systems: The Power of Silence.Educational Administration Quarterly,41(1),83-120.
73. Sashkin, M.,Egermeier, J.(1992).School change models and processes: A review of research and practice.San Francisco:U.S. Dept. of Education.
74. Scott, W. R.(2000).Institutional change and healthcare organizations.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
75. Scott, W. R.(2001).Institutions and Organizations.London:Sage Publications.
76. Smelser, N. J.(1959).Social change in the industrial revolution.London:Routledge.
77. Smelser, N. J.(1991).Social paralysis and social change: British working-class education in the nineteenth century.Chicago:University of California Press.
78. Sottan, K.,Uslaner, E. M.,Haufler, V.(1998).Institutions and social order.Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press.
79. Streeck, W.,Thelen, K. A.(2005).Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies.Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies,Oxford:
80. Tyack, D.,Tobin, W.(1994).The grammar of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change?.American Educational Research Journal,31(3),453-479.
81. Veblen, T.(1971).The Higher learning in America.New York:Augustus Kelley.
82. Winckelmann, J.(Ed.)(1968).Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre.Tübingen:Mohr.
83. Yanow, D.(2000).Conducting interpretive policy analysis.Calif.:Sage.
84. 朱玉仿、陳清溪、蔡明學(2007)。2006 年台灣地區民眾對重要教育議題看法之調查。教育研究與發展期刊，3(3)，1-31。
85. 李家同(2014)。教改休兵，不要鬧了！。臺北:五南。
86. 教育部(2007)。推動十二年國民基本教育說帖。國家圖書館館訊，2，18-21。
87. 薛曉華(1996)。台灣民間教育改革運動：國家與社會的分析。臺北:前衛。