人文精神的通識教育－以國文課程教學活動設計為例

The Humanities Spirit of the General Education-Take the Teaching Activity Design of Chinese Curriculum as an Example

10.7032/JGETSINT.200907.0163

宋千儀(Chien-I Sung)

通識教育 ； 國文教學 ； 教學設計 ； 學習活動設計 ； 人文精神 ； General Education ； Chinese Teaching ； Teaching Design ； Learning Activity Design ； Humanism

北臺灣科技學院通識學報

5期（2009 / 07 / 01）

163 - 181

繁體中文

大學教育的基本精神應是培養學生成為理想的知識份子，與物我和諧共處，並且能客觀思考、理性判斷、表達溝通，甚至要有經世治事的本領。目前的大學教育著重訓練專業技術、強調專業知識，但只是提供了封閉的理論認知，全然悖離了大學教育「完整的人」的目標，通識教育正足以補救專門教育此一偏失。本文以台南藝術大學通識國文課程為例，說明基於因材施教通識教育理念設計之教材與作業。教學宗旨之一為培養學子客觀批判思考的修養、理性價值判斷的智慧。本課程另一目的是藉由融入生活經驗與文化藝術材料，引導學子自主地延伸關懷觸角。並藉任務型（task-based）作業誘導學生實現知識轉移，深度理解文學，同時發揮創造力。

The fundamental spirit of University education is to train a student to become an ideal educated person; to have him get along harmoniously with the nature, the society, other people, and the inner self; and to have him equip with an open mind to accept different standpoint, the mastery of objective thinking, the intelligence of rational judgment, the ability of expression and communication, and maybe even the ability to rule a country or at least getting things done at will. Current university education puts emphasis on training professional skills, and professional knowledge; however, it only provides a rather narrow profession-oriented knowledge, yet completely deviates from the objective of university education of breeding a Complete Man with an open mind-General Education is just right to compensate, or to mend the drawback of such deviation. This article is taking the Chinese curriculum of General Education of TNNUA as an example to introduce its teaching material and homework which are designed based on the ideal of General Education of teaching students in accordance with their aptitude. One of purpose of education is to bring up a student's ability of objective thinking and criticizing, and grow his wisdom of rational judgment. Another purpose of education is to lead students to extend their ability to care and to exercise their creativity by blending their life experiences with other raw materials such as culture and art. By assigning task-based homework Students are led to accomplish transfer of knowledge, to understand literature with depth.

1. (1987)。人文教育十二講。臺北:三民書局。
2. 國立彰化師範大學課程手冊。
3. 漢趙岐注、宋孫奭疏(1979)。十三經注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。
4. 魏何宴注、宋邢昺疏(1979)。十三經注疏。臺北:藝文印書館。
5. Gadamer, H.(1989).Truth and Method.New York:Crossroad.
6. Johnson, R. T.,Johnson, D. W.,Stanne, M. B.(1986).Comparison of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning.American educational research journal,23(3)
7. Newman, John Henry(1996).The Idea of A University.New Haven:Yale University Press.
8. Nonaka, I.、Takeuchi, H.、楊子江譯、王美音譯(1997)。創新求勝：智價企業論。臺北:遠流。
9. 王國維(1993)。王國維哲學美學論文輯佚，上海:
10. 李艾平(2009)。學習遷移理論對任務型應與教學的啟示。Sino-US English Teaching，6(1)
11. 李威熊(2001)。人文精神、人文主義與大學人文教育的探討。中華民國通識教育學會「技職朗院人弜教育研討會」
12. 周鳳五(1993)。通識教育與中國傳統文化。大學通識教育的理論與實際研討會論文集，臺北:
13. 林正珍。國科會研究計劃報告國科會研究計劃報告,國科會。
14. 林安梧(2005)。孔子的六藝之教就是通識教育—世界最早的通識教育家。通識在線，創刊號
15. 曾祥芹(2004)。漢文閱讀學導論。北京:中央文獻出版社。
16. 黃坤錦(2006)。只是專門不是專業。通識在線，4
17. 黃俊傑(2007)。以人文精神作為大學通識教育的基礎。通識在線，10
18. 黃俊傑(1999)。從教育角度論台灣的「人之素質」的提昇。通識教育季刊，6(1)
19. 黃俊傑(2000)。大學通識教育的理念與實踐。中華民國通識教育學會。