醫師於醫療疏失的刑事責任

Criminal Liability of Medical Doctors for Medical Malpractices

Ulrich Schroth；古承宗(Chen-Chung Ku)

過失犯 ； 醫療疏失 ； 承諾 ； 告知說明義務 ； 緩起訴 ； Tort of Negligence ； Medical Misconducts ； Agreement ； Duty to Inform the Explanation ； Deferred Prosecution

高大法學論叢

9卷2期（2014 / 03 / 01）

35+37+39+41 - 59

繁體中文

一般而言，醫療疏失於德國刑法的規範脈絡下以成立過失傷害或過失致死為主。醫師原則上擁有醫療上的方法自由，但實施醫療違反醫療準則，即屬非容許的醫療行為。另外，若病患已經就醫療風險受充分告知，此可排除醫療行為之違法性。最後，關於醫療行為之刑事責任的限制，應當透過緩起訴制度為之，因為此一制度較有助於個案獲得確實評價，且讓程序更具彈性。

Generally speaking, medical malpractices refer mainly as negligent injury or manslaughter under the sequence of ideas in German Criminal Law. Physicians have methodical individualistic in practicing medicine; however, if a practice violates guidelines of practicing medicine, it is determined as a non-permissible act of medical treatment. Further, if a patient is fully informed of a medical risk, it may preclude an act of medical treatment from illegality. Finally, criminal liability of a medical treatment shall be limited by deferred prosecution, it is conductive to cases to have precise assessments and have more flexibility in procedure.

1. Laufs, Adolf,Kern, Bernd-Rüdiger(2010).Handbuch des Arztrechts.München:
2. Peter, Anne-Marie(1992).Arbeitsteilung im Krankenhaus aus strafrechtlicher Sicht.Baden-Baden:
3. Roxin, Claus(2006).Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil.München:
4. Roxin, Claus(2003).Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil.München:
5. Roxin, Claus,Schroth, Ulrich(2010).Handbuch des Medizinstrafrechts.München:
6. Tröndle, Herbert,Fischer, Thomas(2006).Strafgesetzbuch.München:
7. Ulsenheimer, Klaus(2003).Arztstrafrecht in der Praxis.Heidelberg:

1. 葉眉君、吳志正(2018)。醫療刑責過失程度之法實證分析：對醫療刑責合理化之省思。臺大法學論叢，47(3)，1125-1174。
2. (2018)。遠距醫療態樣與行為責任分擔初探。成大法學，35，15-23。