韓國「FTA談判程序」制度的發展與其限制

The Development of South Korea's FTA Bargaining Process and Its Limits

河凡植(Bum-sig Ha)

韓國FTA談判程序 ； 總統令 ； 通商程序法 ； 行政部門 ； 國會 ； South Korea's FTA Bargaining Process ； Presidential Decree ； Trade Procedure Law ； the Executive ； National Assembly

高大法學論叢

15卷2期（2020 / 03 / 01）

73 - 133

繁體中文

韓國在推動與智利的FTA談判以來，由於預期談判過程中此FTA將造成農業的損失，韓國政府在談判進行時遭遇到來自國會、農民與民眾的反對，進而導致對其談判可能產生政治上的風險。因此，韓國政府制定「FTA談判程序制度」，使其法制化，藉此將談判程序定型化。韓國FTA談判程序制度區分談判程序為談判前、中、後階段，且規定行政部門在各階段上的細部程序。韓國談判程序制度是始於「FTA締結程序規則」，之後被「通商程序法」取代。「FTA締結程序規則」是以總統令發布之行政規則，著重於跨部會協調機制，以有效行政部門推動FTA締結。「通商程序法」是個專法，著重於加強國會監督與談判透明性，以牽制行政部門在談判上的專橫，藉此謀求行政部門與國會以及民間之間溝通與互動。然而，由於韓國憲政體制、行政部門與國會關係以及韓國對內外經濟狀況與政治外交環境，韓國行政部門以談判機密為優先，無論談判中或者談判後，不公開談判內容，因此在國會與民間無法瞭解行政部門的談判之情況下，國會監督權與公民的知情權仍受限制。由於韓國行政部門與國會關係為執政黨支持行政部門的政策，在執政黨的支持下，行政部門仍省略國內程序。從此角度上看，韓國FTA談判程序的確有發展，但其程序只不過是形式化的流程。

Since South Korea has pursued FTA negotiations with Chile, there has been concern that the FTA will cause agriculture losses during the preliminary negotiations. The Korea's government faced opposition from the National Assembly, peasants, and the people in the process of FTA negotiations, which led to political threats. Therefore, the South Korea's government has formulated the ＂FTA negotiation procedure system＂ to legalize, thereby formalizing the negotiation procedures. South Korea's FTA bargaining process is divided into pre-bargaining, bargaining, and post-bargaining stages, and it provides the specific procedures of the administrative departments in different stages. South Korea bargaining process starts from the ＂FTA Contracting Procedure Rules＂, which is later replaced by the Trade Procedure Act. ＂FTA Contracting Procedure Rules＂ is administrative rules released by president decree, focusing on the inter-department coordinating mechanism, which makes the administrative department effectively promote the FTA contracting. ＂Trade Procedure Act＂ is an exclusive Act which emphasizes on the Congress supervision and bargaining transparency so as to restrain the arbitrariness of the administrative departments during bargaining and then seek the communication and interaction among the administration, congress and the people. However, Due to Korea's constitutional system, administration and parliamentary relationship, domestic and foreign economic situation and diplomatic environment, South Korea's government prioritizes the confidentiality of the negotiations. Regardless, during or after the negotiations, the content of the negotiations is not made public. Therefore, the parliament and the people cannot understand the government's negotiations, the power of parliamentary supervision and the right of citizens to know are still limited. Administration- Parliament Relations in South Korea is characterized by that the ruling party supports the policy of the administrative departments. Under the support of ruling party, the administration department still omits the domestic procedures. From this point of view, South Korea FTA bargaining process actually developed, but it is just a formalized process.

1. 河凡植(2012)。ECFA 與韓國的因應措施。問題與研究，51(2)，133-156。
   連結：
2. 倪炎元(2014)。南韓「總統制」下總統與國會的對抗僵局。遠景基金會季刊，15(2)，37-78。
   連結：
3. 董思齊(2015)。韓國 FTA 政策轉變的政治分析。台灣國際研究季刊，11(2)，113-136。
   連結：
4. 강병우, Byung-woo(2019).대미 자동차수출 증진을위한 한미자유무역협정 재개정안.통사법률,143,86-111.
5. 국가법령정보센터 （ 國家法令情報中心 ），〈자유무역협정체결절차규정〉（自由貿易協定締結程序規則 ）， http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=88611#0000 （最後瀏覽日：11/14/2019）
6. 국가법령정보센터（國家法令情報中心），〈대한민국헌법〉（大韓民國憲法），http://www.law.go.kr/lsEfInfoP.do?lsiSeq=61603# （最後瀏覽日：11/14/2019）
7. 국가법령정보센터（國家法令情報中心），〈행정절차법〉（行政程序法），http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%ED%96%89%EC%A0%95%EC%A0%88%EC%B0%A8%EB%B2%95 （最後瀏覽日：11/14/2019）
8. 국가법령정보센터（國家法令情報中心），〈통상조약의 체결절차및 이행에 관한 법률〉（通商條約締結程序以及履行相關法律 ）， http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=137338#0000 （最後瀏覽日：11/17/2019）
9. 국가법령정보센터 （ 國家法令情報中心 ），〈 공공기관의정보공개에 관한 법률〉（公共機關情報公開相關法律），http://www.law.go.kr/lsEfInfoP.do?lsiSeq=142582# （最後瀏覽日：11/17/2019）
10. 김경재, Kyong-je(2013).국회의 조약체결 비준동의권행사의 기능과현실.유럽헌법연구,14,191-224.
11. 河凡植(2013)。兩韓國會交流的發展與限制。國際關係學報，36，63-106。
12. 姚鴻成(2012)。韓國締結對外貿易條約與協定之法源研析。紡織月刊，190，50-54。
13. 박가영, Ka-young,한정민, Jeong-min(2015).우리나라 FTA 홍보 현황과 향후 개선방안.KIET 산업경제,3,55-65.
14. 박번순, Bun-soon(2011).한중 FTA 의의와 주요 쟁점.首爾:三星經濟研究所.
15. 박창현, Chang-hyun(2008).통상협상 과정에 있어서의국회의 역할에 관한 연구.首爾:韓國法制研究院.
16. 陳義彥（編）(2015).行政部門.臺北:五南.
17. 왕상한, Sang-han(2011).18 대 국회통상절차관련법안의 주요내용 분석 및 비판.통상법률,102,11-39.
18. 정소현, So-hyun(2018).조약체결절차법 제정 논의에관한 고찰.국제법학회논총,63(3),76-102.
19. 조진만, Jin-man(2011).자유무역협정（FTA）과 한국의국회: 제도적 설정과 현실적 운영의 문제를 중심으로.의정연구,17(1),115-134.
20. 최원목, Won-mog(2006).한국 통상절차법안의문제점과 법 제정 방향.통상법률,72,10-69.
21. 최준영, Jun-young,조진만,가상준, Sang-joon,소병권, Byoung-kwon(2008).국무총리 인사청문회에 나타난 행정부-국회 관계 분석: 회의록에 대한 내용분석을 중심으로.한국정치학회보,42(2),151-169.