题名

國際稅法上數位經濟之課稅問題探討－以OECD「數位經濟之課稅挑戰」之研究報告為中心

并列篇名

Discussion on Taxation of Digital Economy in International Tax Law-Focus on the OECD Research Report on "Tax Challenges in the Digital Economy"

作者

陳清秀(Ching-Hsiou Chen)

关键词

數位經濟 ； 國際稅法 ； 電子商務交易 ； 稅基侵蝕及利潤轉移 ； 課稅聯繫規則 ； digital economy ； international tax law ； e-commerce transactions ； tax base erosion and profit shifting ； taxation nexus rules

期刊名称

高大法學論叢

卷期/出版年月

18卷1期（2022 / 09 / 01）

页次

53 - 127

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

在數位經濟時代，許多交易毋庸透過實體營業場所，而僅需經由網路等方式，即得進行，並運用大量客戶群獲得廣大收益，可獲得更多之超額利潤，如採用「常規交易原則」計算價格，仍無法合理分配利潤。因此國際稅法上，傳統上使用「實體營業場所」之課稅聯繫規則，以及常規交易原則，已無法因應數位經濟之特殊性，而應建立新的課稅聯繫規則。近年來OECD陸續發布有關「數位化帶來的數位化挑戰」，提出建議全球統一的課稅原則與方法（課稅支柱一），應導入「市場所在地管轄區」作為課稅聯繫因素，並建立三層利潤分配機制，其中除按照常規交易原則核實計算歸屬於市場所在地管轄區之所得外，另外導入使用者客戶對於創造價值之貢獻比例，分享其超額利潤，而歸屬於使用者顧客所在地國家課稅，應具有合理性。又為防止國際間租稅規避，OECD建議建立「全球統一的系統化解決方案」，提出「全球最低稅負」（稅率15％）制度（課稅支柱二），對於跨國交易活動，如在一方國家負擔低於全球最低稅負時，則原則上應由他方國家「追補課稅」，以填補國際間課稅漏洞。然而此一制度過於複雜，在執行上徵納雙方必須熟悉各國租稅法規，故有其高難度。是否及如何導入此一方案，必須考量其執行可行性與實用性問題。
英文摘要

In the digital economy era, many transactions can be carried out without going through physical business premises, but only through the Internet, etc., and use a large number of customer groups to obtain large profits and obtain more excess profits, such as adopting the " Arm's Length Principle" of the transfer pricing system, and it is still impossible to reasonably distribute the profits. Therefore, in the international tax law, the traditional taxation linkage rules of "physical business place" and the " Arm's Length Principle" have been unable to cope with the particularity of the digital economy, and new taxation linkage rules should be established. In recent years, the OECD has successively released "the challenges of digitalization brought about by digitalization", and proposed a globally unified taxation principle and method (Taxation Pillar 1). A three-tier profit distribution mechanism, in which, in addition to verifying and calculating the income attributable to the jurisdiction where the market is located in accordance with the principle of conventional transactions, the contribution ratio of the user's customers to the value creation is also introduced to share their excess profits, which are attributed to the country where the user-customer is located. Taxes should be reasonable. In order to prevent international tax evasion, the OECD proposes to establish a "globally unified and systematic solution" and proposes a "global minimum tax burden" (15% tax rate) system (taxation pillar 2), for cross-border transaction activities, such as in one party. When the national tax burden is lower than the global minimum tax burden, in principle, other countries should "recover tax" to fill the international tax loophole. However, this system is too complicated, and both parties must be familiar with the tax laws and regulations of various countries in the implementation, so it is very difficult. Whether and how to introduce this scheme must consider the feasibility and practicability of its implementation.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Council Directive 2002/38/EC of 7 May 2002 (2002), available at https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002L0038&from=EN. (last visited 07/10/2021).
  2. Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (2006), available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006L0112&from=DE. (last visited 07/13/2021).
  3. Avi-Yonah, Reuven S.(2019).ADVANCED INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL TAX LAW.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Pub.
  4. Bach, Stefan,Hubbert, Markus,Müller, Walter(2000).Taxation of E-Commerce: Persistent Problems and Recent Developments.Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung,69(4),657-678.
  5. Cockfield, Arthur,Hellerstein, Walter,Millar, Rebecca,Waerzeggers, Christophe(2013).TAXING GLOBAL DIGITAL COMMERCE.Alphen aan den Rijn:Wolters Kluwer.
  6. Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations(2008).INTERNATIONAL STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION OF ALL ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES.New York:United Nation.
  7. Frankenfield, Jake, Cloud Computing, at https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cloud-computing.asp (last visited 03/01/2022).
  8. Herzefeld,Doernberg(2018).INTERNATIONAL TAXATION IN A NUTSHELL.Saint Paul:West Academic Publishing.
  9. KPMG, KPMG report: OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework agreement on BEPS 2.0 (2021), available at https://home.kpmg/us/en/home/insights/2021/07/tnf-kpmg-report-oecd-g20-inclusive-framework-agreement-beps.html. (last visited 08/01/2021).
  10. KPMG(2016).Addressing hybrid mismatch arrangements- A Government discussion document.
  11. Moid, Sana,Dixit, Shailja(2018).INTERNET TAXATION AND E-RETAILING LAW IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT.U.S.A.:IGI Global.
  12. OECD(2015).Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, Action 1-2015 Final Report.
  13. OECD(2017).International VAT/GST Guidelines.
  14. OECD, Statement by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on the Two-Pillar Approach to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy, As approved by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on 29-30 January 2020,10 (2020), OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, available at https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/statement-by-the-oecd-g20-inclusive-framework-on-beps-january-2020.pdf (last visited 07/15/2021).
  15. OECD, Statement on a Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising From the Digitalisation of the Economy (2021), at https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/statement-on-a-two-pillar-solution-to-address-the-tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy-july-2021.pdf (last visited 07/16/2021).
  16. OECD(2018).Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation- Interim Report 2018: Inclusive Framework on BEPS.
  17. OECD(2013).Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.
  18. OECD, OECD secretariat invites public input on the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Proposal under Pillar Two (2019), at https://www.oecd.org/tax/oecd-secretariat-invites-public-input-on-the-global-anti-base-erosion-proposal-pillar-two.htm (last visited 07/14/2021).
  19. OECD, Public consultation Document- Secretariat Proposal for a “Unified Approach” under Pillar One, 9 October 2019-12 November 2019 (2019), available at https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/public-consultation-document-secretariat-proposal-unified-approach-pillar-one.pdf (last visited 07/16/2021).
  20. OECD, Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation- Report on Pillar Two Blueprint: Inclusive Framework on BEPS (2020), available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/abb4c3d1-en/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/abb4c3d1-en (last visited：07/16/2021).
  21. OECD, Public Consultation Document-Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalization of the Economy, 13 February- 6 March 2019 (2019), available at https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/public-consultation-document-addressing-the-tax-challenges-of-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy.pdf (last visited 07/14/2021).
  22. OECD, Electronic Commerce: Taxation Framework Conditions (1998), at https://www.oecd.org/ctp/consumption/1923256.pdf (last visited 08/02/2021).
  23. OECD,Council of Europe.The Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, Amended by the 2010 Protocol.
  24. Schmidt(2019).Einkommensteuergesetz: Kommentar.
  25. Thompson, James D.(2003).ORGANIZATIONS IN ACTION: SOCIAL SCIENCE BASES OF ADMINISTRATIVE THEORY.New Jersey:Transaction Publishers.
  26. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development(2019).DIGITAL ECONOMY REPORT 2019- VALUE CREATION AND CAPTURE: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.New York:United Nation.
  27. Wünnemann, Monika(2019).Herausforderungen der Besteuerung der digitalen Wirtschaft im Jahr 2019.IStR,134-140.
  28. Wünnemann, Monika(2021).Neue Weltsteuerordnung für Unternehmensgewinne- Die Blueprints der OECD zu Pillar One und Two aus Sicht der deutschen Wirtschaft.IStR,72-79.
  29. 玉木林太郎（2014）。〈OECD/G20 BEPS プロジェクト現狀—2014 年報告書等〉，載於 https://www.oecd.org/tokyo/newsroom/documents/20140922DSGTamaki-ppt-beps.pdf.（最後瀏覽日：07/31/2021）。
  30. 周泰維(2020)。租稅協定對台灣稅法與實務中的「常設機構」概念之影響。月旦會計實務研究，30，22-29。
  31. 林宜賢(2020)。電子勞務與權利金課稅權配置以及在租稅協定的應用分析。月旦會計實務研究，30，13-21。
  32. 林韋廷(2021)。國際課稅規則之大變革—淺談 OECD 兩方針之規範（上）。植根雜誌，3，93-109。
  33. 金子宏(2017)。租稅法。東京:弘文堂。
  34. 張永明(2021)。境外電商銷售電子勞務之所得稅課徵。BEPS 行動方案與國際稅法，台北:
  35. 張景勛（整理）(2017)。數位經濟的特性與衝擊。證券服務，659，23-30。
  36. 梁建道(2019)。數位經濟對國際稅法之衝擊與常設機構之最新發展趨勢。財稅法令半月刊，9，20-39。
  37. 陳衍任(2021)。無形資產移轉訂價的新規則。BEPS 行動方案與國際稅法，台北:
  38. 陳清秀(2020).稅法各論（上）.台北:元照.
  39. 陳清秀(2018)。跨境電子商務交易有關低價（小額）進口貨物之課稅問題（上）。植根雜誌，7，267。
  40. 陳清秀(2018)。跨境電子商務交易有關低價（小額）進口貨物之課稅問題（下）。植根雜誌，8，294。
  41. 陳清秀(2019).國際稅法.台北:元照.
  42. 單珮玲(2000)。電子商務跨國交易—加值稅課稅機制之探討。財稅研究，3，113-123。
  43. 曾仁人(2019)。亞太地區數位經濟之發展與挑戰。主計月刊，764，82-87。
  44. 曾博昇(2021)。確保移轉訂價結果與價值創造相配合。BEPS 行動方案與國際稅法，台北:
  45. 曾博昇,彭人恬(2019)。數位稅的課稅方案與趨勢。月旦會計實務研究，19，13-20。
  46. 曾博昇,藍元駿(2021)。BEPS 行動方案 3。BEPS 行動方案與國際稅法，台北:
  47. 游惠青(2021)。初探數位經濟時代下之國際稅收—以 OECD 與歐盟為中心（上）。植根雜誌，3，110-125。
  48. 渡边智之(2001)。インターネットと課稅システム。東京:東洋経済新報社。
  49. 黃士洲(2021)。跨境電商營業稅相關之稅務課題—以 BEPS 行動方案第 1 號為中心並兼論數位服務稅發展。BEPS 行動方案與國際稅法，台北:
  50. 謝如蘭,魏馬哲(2021)。境外電商銷售電子勞務課徵所得稅及適用租稅協定營業利潤免稅之探討。月旦會計實務研究，28，13-19。
  51. 魏璐、黃曉裡、張博、董碩、孫平平（2020），《OECD 就應對數位經濟帶來的稅收挑戰發佈藍圖報告：支柱一之詳細解讀》，載於德勤 https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cn/Documents/tax/ta-2020/deloitte-cn-tax-tap3252020-zh-201104.pdf（最後瀏覽日：07/15/2021）。
  52. 藤本哲也(2005)。國際租稅法。東京:中央経済社。
print cancel