题名

國民小學健康與體育學習領域教師教學承諾對教學實踐影響之研究

并列篇名

A Study of Relationship between Teaching Commitment and Teaching Practice for Health and Physical Education Teachers in Elementary Schools

DOI

10.6580/JTSP.2006.1(1).01

作者

潘義祥(Yi-Hsiang Pan);周宏室(Hung-Shih Chou)

关键词

健康與體育 ; 教學承諾 ; 教學實踐 ; healthandphysical education ; teaching commitment ; teaching practice

期刊名称

臺灣運動教育學報

卷期/出版年月

1卷1期(2006 / 04 / 01)

页次

1 - 13

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究主要目的在探討健康與體育學習領域教師教學承諾與教學實踐的線性結構關係,以了解在健康與體育學習領域,教師教學承諾是否對教學實踐產生影響。本研究採以量化為主,質化為輔之方式進行研究,以質量整合方式深入探究及詮譯。研究對象為台灣地區國民小學健康與體育學習領域教師,採用自編量表為測量工具,並以分層隨機叢集抽樣方式,發出2100份問卷,共抽有效樣本842份(40.10%),以LISREL統計方式進行考驗。研究結果顯示在理論模式經修正後,樣本適配指標已達到良好的適配階段,其中χ_((11))^2=40.31(p>.05)達適配水準,其他指標也都達到適配水準,其中觀察指標RMSEA=0.08,小於接受值0.10; GFI=0.98,大於接受值0.90; AGFI=0.93,大於接受值0.90; NFI=0.98,大於接受值0.90; CFI=0.98,大於接受值0.90; RMR=0.01,小於接受值0.05; SRMR=0.02,小於接受值0.05; ECVI=0.15介於0.12-0.19信賴區間內。從各項指標顯示值檢視,也驗證了國民小學健康與體育學習領域教師教學承諾直接正向影響教學實踐。

英文摘要

The main purpose of the paper was to confirm the Linear Structure Relationship between teaching commitment and teaching practice in the health and physical education curriculum. This paper took the way of quantitative analysis as the main axis and qualitative analysis as the auxiliary axis to proceed with the study. The study subjects included 842 health and physical education teachers sampled by stratified random cluster sampling method from whole health and physical education teachers for the elementary schools in Taiwan. It adopted self-made questionnaire as the measure instrument. Finally, The Linear Structure Relationship Model was used to test the hypothetical theory model whether it is fit or not. This result indicated that the fit of the modification model was acceptable (X2(11) = 40.31, p>.05; RMSEA=0.08; GFI=0.98; AGFI=0.93; NFI=0.98; CFI=0.98; RMR=0.01; SRMR=0.02; ECVI=0.15 [0.12-0.19]). It showed that health and physical education teacher teaching commitment affect positively teaching practice.

主题分类 社會科學 > 體育學
参考文献
  1. Buchanan, B.(1974).Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly,19,533-546.
  2. Firestone, W. A.,Pennell, J. R.(1993).Teacher commitment, working conditions and differential incentive policies.Review of Educational Research,63(4),484-526.
  3. Graham, K. C.(1996).Running ahead enhancing teacher commitment.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,67(1),45-47.
  4. Handal, G.,Lauvas, P.(1987).Promoting reflective teaching: Supervision in practice.London:Open University Press.
  5. Kettle, B.,Sellars, N.(1996).The development of student teacher's practical theory of teaching.Teaching & Teacher Education,12(1),1-24.
  6. Reyes, Pedro(Ed.)(1990).Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, Performance and productivity.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications, Inc.
  7. Tyree, A. K.(1990).The University of Wisconsin Madison.
  8. Wiener, Y.,Vardia, Y.(1980).Relationship between job, organization and career commitment and work outcomes-an integrative approach.Organizational Behavior & Human Performance,26,81-96.
  9. 江秋玫(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市,國立嘉義大學。
  10. 李新鄉(1993)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市,國立政治大學。
  11. 沈翠蓮(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市,國立高雄師範大學。
  12. 周新富(1991)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市,國立高雄師範大學。
  13. 施碧珍(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立台北教育大學。
  14. 張志毓(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,台北市立師範學院。
  15. 歐宗明(2001)。國小體育教師實際角色知覺之研究。大專體育學刊,3(2),1-9。