影響大專體育教師課程價值取向因素之研究

The Affecting Factors of Curricular Value Orientations on Colleges' Physical Education teachers

10.6580/JTSP.2008.3(1).04

蔡欣延(Joseph Hsin-Yen Tsai)；周宏室(Hung-Shih Chou)

大專體育教師 ； 課程價值取向 ； 影響因素 ； Colleges' physical education teachers ； curricular value orientations ； the influencing factors

臺灣運動教育學報

3卷1期（2008 / 05 / 01）

51 - 72

繁體中文

本研究的目的乃試圖以深度訪談的方法，找出影響不同服務年資的大專體育教師課程價值取向之因素。方法：基於滿足理論飽和的原理，以五類服務年資（1-5年、6-10年、11-15年、16-20年及21年以上），依據理論抽樣的原理，以立意取樣的方式，選定11位元大專體育教師進行深度訪談。以自編的訪談大綱，進行深度訪談，以全程錄音的方式，記錄受訪教師的實務經驗，將錄音帶轉為逐字稿，並寫下反思劄記；先採用開放性編碼，再以主軸編碼的方式將資料串聯起來，藉以深入瞭解實際影響不同服務年資的大專體育教師課程價值取向的因素為何？結果：影響不同服務年資大專體育教師課程價值取的因素，有其共通性、差異性和脈絡性。影響因素可分為教師、學生、社會、教材、環境和制度等六大層面，而其中影響最大的以「教師」層面的因素居多，「學生」層面的因素次之；而且有「主要」與「次要」因素，及「個人」與「情境」因素之別。結論：顯示出影響大專體育教師課程價值取向的因素，會隨著教師服務年資之不同而有差異的現象。

Purpose: The purpose of this study intended to find out the affecting factors of curricular value orientations on Colleges' physical education teachers. Methods: This study used purposeful sampling and in-depth interview on eleven Colleges' physical education teachers who serviced at different schools (their service years were separately 1-5 years, 6-10 years, 11-15 years, 16-20 years or over 21 years ) to meet the theory of theoretical saturation. And used self-design interview outline to do in-depth interview and taping to record teachers actual experiences; then transferred the data into words and wrote down reflective notes. Adopted open coding and axial coding to combine with all data for understanding what were the influencing factors of curricular value orientations on Colleges' physical education teachers. Results: The affecting factors of curricular value orientations on Colleges' physical education teachers were showed that had their comments, differences and contexts. These factors included six facets: teacher, student, society, subject matter, and context. The primary factors were ”teacher- facet” and ”student- facet” factors were next. Conclusion: The affecting factors of curricular value orientations on Colleges' physical education teachers will appear differently by teachers' service years.

1. 王秋燕、黃恆祥(2003)。運動員運動道德的認知與實踐─「知」與「行」的省思。大專體育學刊，5(2)，1-10。
   連結：
2. 蔡宗河(2005)。英國《學科領導人標準》對我國教師專業發展的啟示。教育研究集刊，51(3)，101-133。
   連結：
3. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press
4. Anning, A.(Ed.)(1995).A national curriculum for the early years.Philadelphia:Open Universities Press.
5. Behets, D.(2001).Value orientations of physical education preservice and inservice teachers.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,20,144-154.
6. Behets, D.,Vergauwen, L.(2004).Value orientations of elementary and secondary physical education teachers in Flanders.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,75(2),156-164.
7. Curtner-Smith, M.,Meek, G. A.(2000).Teachers' value orientations and their compatibility with the national curriculum for physical education.European Physical Education Review,6(1),27-45.
8. Ennis, C. D.,Chen, A.(1995).Teachers' value orientations in urban and rural school settings.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,66(1),41-50.
9. Ennis, C. D.,Zhu, W.(1991).Value orientations: A description of teachers' goals for student learning.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,62(1),33-40.
10. Freire, P.(1970).Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York:Continuum.
11. Guskey, T. R.(2002).Professional development and teacher change.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,8(3),381-391.
12. Huang, Chun-Ching(1999).Miami.,Florida international University.
13. Jewett, A. E.(1994).Curriculum theory and research in sport pedagogy.Sport Science Review,3(1),56-71.
14. Jewett, A. E.,Bain, L. L.,Ennis, C. D.(1995).The curriculum process in physical education.Dubuque, IA:Wm C. Brown.
15. Liu, Hsien-Yung(2001).Columbia,Teacher College, Columbia University.
16. Preist, R. F.,Krause, J. V.,Beach, J.(1999).Four-year in College athletes' ethical value choices in sports situations.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,70(2),219-230.
17. Rokeach, M.(1973).The nature of human values.New York:Free Press..
18. Schwab, J. J.(1969).The practical: A language for curriculum.School Review,77(1),1-23.
19. Silverman, S.(Ed.),Ennis, C. D.(Ed.)(2003).Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
20. 方德隆譯、Ornstein, A. C.、Hunkins, F. P.(2004)。課程基礎理論。臺北市:臺灣培生教育。
21. 王春堎(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院體育研究所。
22. 吳芝儀譯、廖梅花譯、Strauss, A. L.、Corbin, J.(2001)。紮根理論研究方法。嘉義市:濤石文化。
23. 周宏室編(2004)。運動教育學研究法（續）。臺北市:師大書苑。
24. 國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心(2003)。質性資料分析、詮釋與撰寫：國立臺灣師範大學教育研究中心質性工作坊成果摘要。教育研究資訊，11(4)，159-172。
25. 陳秉璋、陳信木(1990)。價值社會學。臺北市:桂冠。
26. 甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務─解構與重構。臺北市:高等教育文化。
27. 謝應裕(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所。
28. 藍金香(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣，國立體育學院體育研究所。

1. 楊亮梅、陳俊民(2016)。以體育教師課程價值取向觀點談道德教學之促進。大專體育，136，1-12。