國小體操專長與非專長教師學科教學知識與學生學習成就之比較研究

Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Student Learning Achievement: A Comparison of Gymnastic Specialist Teacher and Nonspecialist Teacher in Elementary School

10.6580/JTSP.2009.4(1).04

顏貝珊(Pei-Sha Yen)；闕月清(Nyit-Chin Keh)

體操專長教師 ； 非體操專長教師 ； 學科教學知識（PCK） ； 學生學習成就 ； 學生知覺 ； gymnastic specialist teacher ； gymnastic nonspecialist teacher ； pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) ； student learning achievement ； student perception

臺灣運動教育學報

4卷1期（2009 / 10 / 01）

59 - 78

繁體中文

本研究目的為探討體操專長教師與非專長教師之學科教學知識（PCK）內涵及其建構來源之差異，與其學生學習成就、學生知覺情形的不同。研究方法採觀察與訪談瞭解教師的學科教學知識與建構來源，以動作技能評量工具進行教學前後之學習成就測驗，透過刺激回憶訪談瞭解學生知覺情形。研究結果：一、PCK內涵，兩位教師在課程知識、體操學科知識與教學情境的知識有明顯的差異，在學習者的知識方面略嫌不足；二、PCK建構來源，專長背景造成學科知識的差異，師資培育對兩位教師主要是體育系專門課程的影響；三、學生學習成就，專長教師學生的學習成就優於非專長教師學生，教師學科教學知識可能對學生成就產生影響；四、學生知覺，兩班學生對教學的理解與專長教師學生對遊戲活動的喜愛，發現教師對學生知覺產生影響。結論：教師知識內涵是影響學生學習的重要因素之一。本研究結果可供師資培育機構、體操教學者與後續研究者作為參考。

The purpose of this study was to examine the difference of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and constructive source of pedagogical content knowledge of a gymnastic specialist teacher and nonspecialist teacher, and to compare the learning achievement and the perception of their students. Methods: Observation and interview were used to collect qualitative data of PCK and constructive source. The difference of learning achievement was measured by gymnastic motor skill assessment tool. Stimulus recall interview was used to collect data on students' perception condition. Results: 1. Curriculum knowledge, gymnastic subject matter knowledge and knowledge of educational contexts were different between the two teachers. Two teachers were insufficient in knowledge of learner; 2. The constructive source of PCK was different due to different background in gymnastic training. Physical education professional curriculum offered more influence than general educational professional curriculum; 3. Student learning achievement of specialist teacher was better than that of nonpsecialist teacher; 4. Student perception was partly affected by their teachers' PCK. Students of specialist teacher had more understanding and in favor of game activities. Conclusion: PCK of teachers was one of important factors in students learning. The findings of the study could be used as a reference for teacher education, gymnastic teaching and future research.

1. Ayvazo, S.(2007).OH,The Ohio State University.
2. Barrett, K. R.,Collie, S.(1996).Children learning lacrosse from teachers learning to teach it: The discovery of pedagogical content knowledge by observing children's movement.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,67(3),297-309.
3. Carpenter, T. P.,Fennema, E.,Peterson, P. L.,Carey, D. A.(1988).Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of students' problem solving in elementary arithmetic.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,19(5),385-401.
4. Dunkin, M. J.,Biddle, B.(1974).The study of teaching.New York:Holt Reinhart, & Winston.
5. Gallahue, D. L.(1993).Developmental physical education for today's children.Madison, Wis.:Brown & Benchmark.
6. Graber, K.(1995).The influence of teacher education programs on the beliefs of the student teachers: General pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and teacher education course work.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,14,157-178.
7. Griffey, D. C.,Housner, L. D.(1991).Difference between experienced and in experienced teacher's planning decisions, interactions, student engagement, and instruction climate.Research Quarterly for Exercise and sport,62,196-204.
8. Grossman, P. L.(1989).A study in contrast sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English.Journal of Teacher Education,40(5),24-31.
9. Grossman, P. L.,Richert, A. E.(1988).Unacknowledge knowledge growth: A re-examination of the effects of teacher education.Teaching and Teacher Education,4,53-62.
10. Harari, I.(1986).Ohio State University.
11. Housner, L. D.,Griffey, D. C.(1994).Wax on, wax off-Pedagogical content knowledge in motor skill instruction.Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance,65,63-68.
12. Kutame, M. A.(1997).Ohio State University.
13. McDiarmid, G. W.(1990).Challenging prospective teachers' beliefs during early field experience: A quixotic undertaking?.Journal of Teacher Education,41(3),12-20.
14. Miles, M. B.,Huberman, A. M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.California:SAGE.
15. Patterson, P.,Faucette, N.(1990).Children's attitudes toward physical activity in classes Taught by specialist versus nonspecialist P.E. teachers.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,9,324-331.
16. Peterson, P. L.,Swing, S. R.,Stark, K. D.,Waas, G. A.(1984).Students: cognition and time on task during mathematics instruction.American Educational Research Journal,211(3),487-515.
17. Rovegno, I.(1994).Teaching within a curricular zone of safety: School culture and the situated nature of student teachers' pedagogical content knowledge.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,65(3),269-279.
18. Sanders, S.,Graham, G.(1995).Kindergarten children's initial experience in physical education: The relentless persistence for play clashes with the zone of acceptable responses.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,14,372-383.
19. Schempp, P. G.,Manross, D.,Tan, S.K.S.,Fincher, M. D.(1998).Subject expertise and teachers' knowledge.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,17,342-356.
20. Sebren, A.(1995).Preservice teachers' reflections and knowledge development in a field based elementary school physical education methods course.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,14,262-283.
21. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57,1-22.
22. Siedentop, D.,Eldar, E.(1989).Expertise, experience and effectiveness.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,8,254-260.
23. Vickers, J. N.(1988).Knowledge structures of expert-novice gymnasts.Human Movement Science,7,47-72.
24. Walkwitz, E.,Lee, A.(1992).The role of teacher knowledge in elementary physical education: An exploratory study.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,63(2),179-185.
25. 吳宜玲(1993)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學。
26. 林曉雯(1994)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學。
27. 林靜萍(2002)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學。
28. 徐偉民(1996)。屏東，國立屏東師範學院。
29. 國立台灣師範大學體育研究與發展中心編(2000)。學校體育教學研究方法。台北市:師大體研中心。
30. 教育部(1997)。學校體育教材教法與評量（十四）體操。台北市:教育部。
31. 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。
32. 陳雅珍(2007)。臺南，國立臺南大學。
33. 黃永和(1996)。新竹，國立新竹師範學院。
34. 劉健慧(2006)。臺中，國立臺中教育大學。
35. 劉鴻博(1993)。彰化，國立彰化師範大學。
36. 闕月清(2003)。初任體育教師學科教學知識與角色知覺之相關研究。台北:復文。

1. 戴玉林(2014)。國小教師體育專業背景與學生體適能之關係：跨資料庫取向研究。臺灣運動教育學報，9(2)，65-84。
2. 黃家凱,林子斌(2022)。國際教學實習對國際素養與教學專業的影響與啟發：以X大學為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，15(3)，25-50。
3. 劉怡薰,宋曜廷(2020)。中等學校師資生任教學科專門知識檢測機制之探討。教育科學研究期刊，65(2)，167-194。