小組檔案評量在國小運動教育模式教學之行動研究

The Process of Practice for Small-group Portfolio Assessment in Physical Education Instruction in Elementary School-A Case Study of Sport Education Model

10.6580/JTSP.2010.5(1).03

蕭明芳(Ming-Fang Hsiao)；林靜萍(Ching-Ping Lin)

檔案評量 ； 體育教學評量 ； 運動教育模式 ； 樂樂棒球 ； portfolio assessment ； assessments of physical education ； sport education model ； Tee ball

臺灣運動教育學報

5卷1期（2010 / 12 / 01）

67 - 91

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在探討小組檔案評量於國小運動教育模式體育教學之實踐歷程及其對學生學習的影響。採行動研究的方式，以佳佳國小六年級一個班級為研究對象，進行11週的樂樂棒球課程。本研究小組檔案評量於體育領域教學中的實踐歷程為：先確認教學問題、發展行動策略，其次，將小組檔案評量的內容融入教學，過程中不斷反省、修正。研究發現：小組檔案評量確實發揮讓學生反省思考的功能，能深入且從多元的面向去瞭解學生的學習成效，在認知方面，透過學習過程反省，增加對動作概念、規則、戰術的理解；在動作技能方面，有助樂樂棒球動作技能的提升；在情意方面，促進團隊合作、感受運動樂趣；在實踐方面，能增進學生參與運動。此外，學生、教師及家長都認為實施小組檔案評量有助學生的學習，並能增加家長、教師與學生之間的互動與溝通。

The primary purpose was to investigate the process of practice for small-group portfolio assessment. Action research was employed to a class of 6th graders in Jia Jia Elementary School, a 11-week Tee ball program was conducted. This practice began with the finding of teaching problems, identification of information, and development of action strategies. Small-group portfolio assessment would be integrated into teaching, while continuous reflection and revision were carried out throughout the process. The research finfings were: small-group portfolio assessment could help students demonstrate their reflection competence. Teachers could also evaluate students' performance from multiple perspectives. In terms of cognition, students' understanding of the movement, rules, and tactics of Tee ball game could be enhanced via reflection of learning process. Skills were also improved. The assessment also helped to promote team-work bondage. Students enjoyed the game and the popularity of sports was increased among students. In brief, students, teachers, and parents considered that the implementation of small-group portfolio assessment was helpful to students' learning, and could enhance the interaction and communication among parents, teachers, and students.

1. 林靜萍（2006）。體育教學策略與多元評量之運用。高中體育暫行綱要進階研習資料。
2. Hastie, P. A.(2000).An ecological analysis of a sport education season.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,19,355-373.
3. Hastie, P. A.,Trost, S. G.(2002).Student physical activity levels during a season of sport education.Pediatric Exercise Science,14,64-74.
4. Kinchin, G. D.(2001).Using team portfolios in a sport education season.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,72(2),41-44.
5. Kirk, M.(1997).Using portfolios to enhance student learning and assessment.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,68(7),29-33.
6. Lund, J. L.(1999).Creating rubrics for physical education.Reston, VA:National Association for Sport and Physical Education.
7. Melograno, V. J.(1998).Professional and student portfolios for physical education.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
8. Silverman, S.(1999).Can girls have success in the sport education model?.Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,70(4),8.
9. Synder, P. P.(1997).Columbus,Ohio State University.
10. Veal, M. L.(1988).Pupil assessment perceptions and practices of secondary teacher.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,7,327-342.
11. Veal, M. L.(1992).School-based theories of pupil assessment: A case study.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,63,48-59.
12. Wallhead, T.L.,Ntoumanis, N.(2004).Effects of a sport education intervention on students' motivation responses in physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,23,4-18.
13. 王瓊惠(2007)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學。
14. 田麗娟(2001)。臺北市，國立臺北師範學院。
15. 吳清山、林天佑(1997)。卷宗評量。教育資料與研究雙月刊，15(2)，46。
16. 呂天得(1998)。臺中市，國立體育學院。
17. 李坤崇(1999)。多元化教學評量。臺北市:心理。
18. 張建成編(2007)。中小學健康與體育學習領域之教學與實務。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
19. 張秋煉(2001)。臺北市，臺北市立教育大學。
20. 張瑞珍(2001)。臺中市，國立臺中師範學院。
21. 教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市:作者。
22. 許義雄譯、黃月嬋譯、Rink, J. R.(2001)。體育教學策略。臺北市:藝軒圖書。
23. 許義雄、葉國樑(2000)。「健康與體育」學習領域之教學評量。翰林文教雜誌，11，12-18。
24. 郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量。臺北市:精華。
25. 郭彥成(2005)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
26. 陳春蓮(2004)。體育教學的反省與實踐。臺北市:師大書苑。
27. 陳昭宇(2004)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
28. 陳勝雄(2003)。臺中市，國立體育學院。
29. 黃至賢(2005)。新竹市，國立新竹教育大學。
30. 黃秀文(1996)。從傳統到變通：教學評量的省思。國民教育研究學報，2，1-26。
31. 鄒慧英譯、Linn, R. L.、Gronlund, N. E.(2003)。測驗與評量—在教學上的應用。臺北市:洪葉文化。
32. 劉玉瑩(2003)。彰化縣，國立彰化師範大學。
33. 歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。臺北市:心理。
34. 鄭英耀譯、蔡佩玲譯、Danielson, C.、Abrutyn, L.(2003)。檔案教學。臺北市:心理。
35. 闕月清編(2008)。理解式球類教學法。臺北市:師大書苑。
36. 顏嘉生(2004)。臺中市，國立體育學院。