國中生知覺體育教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識之研究

Perception of Students on PE Teachers' Teaching Style Preference and Pedagogical Content Knowledge

10.6580/JTSP.2013.8(1).03

林書安(Shu-An Lin)；曾季秀(Chi-Hsiu Tseng)；楊明蓁(Ming-Chen Yang)；王文宜(Wen-Yi Wang)

國中學生 ； 教學風格 ； 學科教學知識 ； junior high school students ； teaching style ； pedagogical content knowledge

臺灣運動教育學報

8卷1期（2013 / 05 / 01）

31 - 44

繁體中文

本研究目的為探討不同背景變項的國中學生知覺體育教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識之差異情形，以及體育教師教學風格偏好、體育教師學科教學知識的知覺對學生喜愛體育課程度之預測能力。本研究透過問卷調查法，以「學生知覺體育教師教學風格偏好量表」及「學生知覺體育教師學科教學知識量表」為研究工具調查臺北市816位國中學生對體育教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識之研究。所得數據以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析與多元逐步迴歸等統計方式進行分析。不同背景變項之國中學生在知覺教師教學風格偏好與教師學科教學知識上有所差異，且體育教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識之「鼓勵學生參與」、「教師主導」能有效預測學生喜好體育課程度，而「小組引導」為負向影響。因此，教師可藉由學生的知覺來省思自身的教學，學生知覺不同的教師教學風格偏好與學科教學知識會有不同的學習感受。本研究建議教師應了解學生對自身教學風格的偏好及學科教學知識的知覺為何，以期在體育課程及教學計與實施上，更能有效的展現出體育教師的專業能力。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences perceptions of students with different background on different kind of teaching style preference and pedagogical content knowledge among PE teachers of junior high school. The questionnaires were administered to a sample of 816 students who were purposeful sampled from four junior high schools of Taipei city. The study tools included ”The pupils' perception scale of PE teacher's teaching style preference” and ”The pupils' perception scale of PE teacher's PCK”. The data was analyzed through descriptive statistics, independent-sample t test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. There was a significant difference between junior high school students of different background variables on PE teachers teaching style preference and pedagogical content knowledge, and the encouraging participation, leading of teacher of PE teachers teaching style preference and pedagogical content knowledge can forecast the student's degree of liking on physical education, but there was a negative influence on conduct of team. Teachers can introspect their teaching by perception of students, different perception of students on PE teacher's teaching style and PCK will have different learning feelings. This study suggested teachers should comprehend the feelings of their students on teaching style and PCK for their teaching design in the future, to demonstrate the professional of PE teachers. Future studies can investigate the correlation of the preference of teaching style, PCK, and the learning of students.

1. 周宏室、劉照金(2004)。影響台灣地區學生體育態度之關鍵因素研究。大專體育學刊，6(1)，1-15。
   連結：
2. Baek, S.G.,Choi, H J.(2002).The relationship between students' perceptions of classroom environment and their academic achievement in Korea.Asia Pacific Education,3(1),125-135.
3. Chang, C. Y.(2004).The study of designing "Pupils' Perceptions of Science Teachers' PCK" Instrument.annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,Vancouver, BC.:
4. Goudas, M.,Biddle, S.,Fox, K.,Underwood, M.(1995).It ain't what you do, it's the way you do it! Teaching style affects children's motivation in track and field lessons.The Sport Psychologist,9,254-264.
5. Heimlich, J. E.,Norland, E.(2002).Teaching Style: Where Are We Now?.New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,93,17-25.
6. Henze, I.,van Driel, J. H.,Verloop, N.(2008).Development of experienced science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and the universe.International Journal of Science Education,30(10),1321-1342.
7. JeongAe, Y.(2011).Portraying Physical Education-Pedagogical Content Knowledge for the professional Learning of Physical Educator.The Physical Educator,68(2),98-112.
8. Koushki, P. A.,Kuhn, H. A.(1982).How reliable are student evaluations of teachers?.Engineering Education,72,362-367.
9. Kulinna, P. H.,Cothran, D. J.(2003).Physical education teachers' self-reported use and perceptions of various teaching styles.Learning and Instruction,13(6),597-609.
10. Rayneri, L. J.,Gerber, B. L.,Wiley, L. P.(2003).Gifted achievers and underachievers: The impact of learning style preferences in the classroom.The Journal of secondary Gifted Education,14(4),197-204.
11. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-22.
12. Treffinger, D.(1975).Teaching for self directed learning: A priority for the gifted and talented.Gifted Child Quarterly,19(1),46-59.
13. Van Driel, J.H.,De Jong, O.,Verloop, N.(2002).The development of preservice chemistry teachers' PCK.Science Education,86,572-590.
14. Yang, M. C.,Shin, K. T.,Hsueh, M. C.,Tseng, C. H.(2012).The study of physical education teachers' teaching preference and pedagogical content knowledge.2012 AAHPERD National convention & exposition,Boston, MA.:
15. 王珩(2005)。國小英語教師學習與教學風格之研究。臺中教育大學學報：人文藝術，19(2)，71-88。
16. 林國凍(2009)。日本的 Lesson Study 如何引發教師專業發展之研究。教育研究與發展，5(1)，166-184。
17. 段曉林、王國華、張惠博(1998)。學生對教師之學科教學知覺問卷之發展。中華民國教育學會科學教育學刊，6(4)，363-381。
18. 張世忠、管世應、謝幸芬(2009)。大學生知覺新進教師PCK 之個案研究。數理學科教學知能，1，1-20。
19. 張靜儀、戴翠華(2003)。「國小學童知覺自然老師PCK量表」之效化研究。國立臺北師範學院學報，16，187-212。
20. 陳佩瑩(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立嘉義大學。
21. 陳春蓮(2002)。以觀察工具促進體育教師教學型為之反省。大專體育，59，81-88。
22. 陳美如(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北師範學院。
23. 陳莉君(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺北教育大學。
24. 鄭英耀、莊雪華、顏嘉玲(2008)。揭開創意教材的神秘面紗。師大學報，53(1)，61-58。
25. 謝甫佩、洪振方(2004)。國小學童對自然科教師學科教學之知覺調查研究。科學教育研究與發展，38，1-16。
26. 謝麗珍(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學創造思考暨資賦優異教育研究所。

1. 盧俊宏,黃美瑤,涂馨友,林信宏,周建智(2021)。電腦模擬健康體適能教學對學生創造力與學科教學知識的影響。大專體育學刊，23(2)，117-133。
2. 盧秋如,蔡國權,黃美瑤,周建智(2019)。團隊中自我迷戀人格對社會懈怠之影響：合作學習的調節效應。大專體育學刊，21(2)，140-155。
3. 羅玉枝、黃志成、曹健仲(2015)。體育教師教學風格量表之編制。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，14(1)，213-221。
4. 謝麗娟、黃順盈、黃美瑤、方同賢(2017)。學生知覺體育教師教學風格對班級氣氛及創造力影響之研究。臺灣運動教育學報，12(2)，1-14。