题名

以QMTPS系統觀察工具分析體育師資生教學品質與知覺情形

并列篇名

A case study of pre-service physical education teachers’ effective teaching behavior and perception: An example of the QMTPS systematic observation instrument

DOI

10.6580/JTSP.2015.10(2).04

作者

王奎元(Kuei-Yuan Wang);掌慶維(Ching-Wei Chang);吳采陵(Cai-Ling Wu)

关键词

有效教學 ; 職前體育教師 ; 體育教學實習 ; effective teaching ; pre-service physical education teachers ; Teaching Practice of Physical Education

期刊名称

臺灣運動教育學報

卷期/出版年月

10卷2期(2015 / 11 / 01)

页次

57 - 77

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

體育教學實習為體育師資生的重要養成階段,過程中師資生所建構的教學思維、方法、信念,都攸關未來的教學行為。因此,本研究目的:為分析體育師資生的教學品質,從中探討師資生對自身教學行為與能力的知覺,以進一步發展有效教學行為。方法:本研究以系統觀察法QMTPS(Qualitative Measures of Teaching Performance Scale)為分析工具,對師資生實地教學做觀察記錄,並進一步協助師資生做教學省思。首先選取2位教學實習階段之體育師資生為參與者,並以技能取向之教學項目為觀課目標,師資生每週試教2節課,1節課50分鐘,共12節課(600分鐘),研究者以每節課入班觀察做紙筆記錄及影片拍攝為資料蒐集之方法,定期每週與同儕研究員以QMTPS工具分析教學,教學實習總期程結束後分別做半結構訪談各1次。結果:2位師資生在QMTPS分析的教學品質中得出2位雖口語表達能力佳,但在活動性質的變化、示範行為完整性、動作提示與回饋的品質,仍有待加強。知覺上,師資生對於運動術科的精熟度,教學活動設計、教學臨場反應與教學方法的應用皆期望有更進一步的精進。結論:師資生在受到QMTSP系統觀察工具的幫助下,部分教學上的品質有微幅提升,如提示量的合適性、提示的正確性、教師回饋符合課題的程度皆有成長,亦同時發現自身較不足之處,主要為示範的完整性與提供有品質的提示有較大的精進空間。

英文摘要

Purpose: This case study was, in order to develop effective teaching during physical education teacher education(PETE), to analyze 2 pre-service teachers’ effective teaching behavior as well as to explore their own perception on teaching. The Qualitative Measures of Teaching Performance Scale(QMTPS), as one of the systematic observation tools, was used to record and analyze pre-service teachers’ teaching. Methods: 2 pre-service PE teachers were recruited as the participants. A total of 12 lessons (600 minutes) were taught by the pre-service PE teachers. In terms of data collection, QMTPS tool was used to on-site observation and filming, and the individual interviews were conducted after the end of the PE teaching class. Results: Although pre-service PE teachers demonstrated good verbal presentation of task, the change in the nature of the activities, demonstrations behavior, and the quality of feedback were components that needed to be strengthened. Conclusion: Pre-service PE teachers’ effective teaching behavior might be improved by the QMTPS instrument, however, the readiness of the mastery of pre-service PE teachers’ content knowledge and competency of the specific sports, PE activity design, teaching repertoires in response to PE teaching situations, and teaching methods were still needed to be further sophisticated, the practice of demonstration and action is relatively slightly inferior Male preservice teacher's part.

主题分类 社會科學 > 體育學
参考文献
  1. 周禾程、劉兆達(2007)。中學體育實習教師課程價值取向之研究─以國立台灣師範大學與國立體育學院為例。國立體育學院論叢,18(2),13-26。
    連結:
  2. 趙麗雲(2006)。體育運動教學研究概說。中華體育,20(4),32-43。
    連結:
  3. 蕭秋祺(2009)。國中體育教師教學信念及其有效教學表現。體育學報,42(2),49-66。
    連結:
  4. (2003).Teaching games for understanding in physical education and sport: An international perspective.
  5. 掌慶維(2013)。系統觀察法。取自教育部,體育運動大辭典網址http://sportspedia.perdc.ntnu.edu.tw/content?MainID=2970
  6. Boyce, B.(1992).The effects of three styles of teaching on university students' motor performance.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,11,389-401.
  7. Cano, J.(2001).What is known about effective teaching?.The Agricultural Education Magazine,74(3),5-11.
  8. Gusthart, J. L.,Kelly, I. M.,Rink, J.E.(1997).The validity of the qualitative measures of teaching performance scale as a measure of teacher effectiveness.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,16(2),196-210.
  9. Gusthart, J. L.,Sprigings, E. J.(1989).Student learning as a measure of teacher effectiveness in physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,8(4),298-311.
  10. HA, S.C.(2001).Relationship of teacher task presentation and student learning performance in basketball.Hong Kong Journal of Sports Medicine and Sports Science,12(12),52-63.
  11. Hall, T. J.,Heidorn, B.,Welch, M.(2011).A description of preservice teachers' task presentation skills.Physical Educator,68(4),188-198.
  12. Rink, J. E.,Werner, P.(1989).Qualitative measures of teaching performance scale (QMTPS)..Analyzing physical education and sport instruction,2,269-276.
  13. Shulman, L. S.(1987).Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard educational review,57(1),1-23.
  14. Siedentop, D.(1991).Developing teaching skills in physical education.Mountain View, CA:Mayfield.
  15. Silverman, S.J.(ed.),Ennis, C.D.(ed.)(1996).Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction.Champaign, Ill:Human Kinetics Publishers.
  16. Stran, M.,Curtner-Smith, M.(2009).Influence of occupational socialization on two preservice teachers' interpretation and delivery of the sport education model.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,28(1),38-53.
  17. 吳淑鈴(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺南市,國立臺南大學。
  18. 吳德城(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  19. 林靜萍(1996)。體育試教老師教學行為分析。體育學報,21,13-24。
  20. 夏淑琴(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學。
  21. 莊逸萍(2001)。系統觀察法應用於有效體育教學之比較分析。大專體育學術專刊,19-27。
  22. 許義雄(1990)。七十九年度體育學術分區座談會落實體育科的有效教學-就ALT-PE 系統觀察談起。中華體育季刊,4(1),96-102。
  23. 詹恩華、闕月清(2013)。不同價值取向之體育師資生教學行為分析─個案研究。2013 年體育運動學術團體聯合年會暨學術研討會,桃園縣:
被引用次数
  1. 楊育寧,莊哲偉(2017)。「觀功念恩」融入專業課程之教學省思-以博雅通識課程為例。中科大學報,4(1),107-125。
  2. 鄭漢吾(2019)。「素養導向體育教材教法」教學實施與學習成效之行動研究。臺灣運動教育學報,14(2),16-42。