同儕教導運用於地板滾球教學對國小資源班學生動作技能之影響

Effect of Peer Tutoring as An Instructional Approach in the Boccia on Motor Skills for Students Placed in Resource Room Program of Elementary School

10.6580/JTSP.201805_13(1).01

姜筱華(Hsiao-Hua Chiang)；周俊良(Chun-Liang Chou)；李偉清(Wei-Ching Lee)

手眼協調 ； 投擲技能 ； 適應體育 ； adapted physical education ； hand-eye coordination ； throwing skills

臺灣運動教育學報

13卷1期（2018 / 05 / 01）

1 - 29

繁體中文

目的：探討地板滾球教學運用同儕教導策略對國小資源班學生動作技能之影響成效。方法：採用單一受試研究法之跨受試多探試設計。動作技能分為「投擲技能」和「手眼協調」兩部分，前者係透過研究者自編之「地板滾球形成性評量檢核表」及「地板滾球比賽表現評估表」蒐集資料，並將資料進行圖示法、目視分析與C統計處理，以瞭解介入及維持的成效。而後者則在教學介入之前、後分別實施「拜瑞－布坦尼卡視覺－動作統整發展測驗」，並將前後測的成績對照常模且以成對樣本t檢定進行統計分析。結果：運用同儕教導於地板滾球教學，對三名國小資源班學生「投擲技能」之學習均有立即與維持效果。而「手眼協調」之學習也均有提升的效果，其中以「動作協調」能力最為明顯。結論：同儕教導運用於地板滾球教學確實能對國小資源班學生之動作技能產生顯著的增進效果。

Purpose: This study aimed to employ peer tutoring as an instructional approach in the Boccia to affect motor skills of special students placed in resource room program in elementary school level. Method: Across-subjects multiple probe design of single subject research was conducted to get the data concerning motor skills. Motor skills were divided into ＂throwing skills＂ and ＂hand-eye coordination＂. The former ＂Boccia formative assessment checklist＂ and ＂Boccia game performance evaluation form＂ were designed by researchers to collect data analyzed by graphic method, visual analysis and C statistics, in order to understand the effect of intervention and maintenance. The latter ＂The Berry-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration＂ was implemented in before and after of Boccia teaching, and the results of pretest and posttest that were contrasted to norm and analyzed by paired-samples t test. Result: The use of peer tutoring as an instructional approach in the Boccia could promote the immediate and maintenance effect of throwing skills in the learning performance of the 3 resource room program students. The use of peer tutoring as an instructional approach in the Boccia could also promote the hand-eye coordination abilities, which ＂motor coordination＂ ability was the most obvious. Conclusion: Peer tutoring as an instructional approach in the Boccia for students placed in resource room program of elementary school in the motor skills can really have a significant effect.

1. 王欣宜、蔡怡姿(2013)。國小資源班智能障礙學生社會技巧方案學習成效之研究。特殊教育與輔助科技，6，1-21。
   連結：
2. 杜正治、辛怡葳(2008)。教師導向教學法與同儕協助學習法之比較：並行處理設計之應用。特殊教育學報，27，81-98。
   連結：
3. 張瓊文、黃國鑫(2007)。同儕教導之個案研究：以國小普通班聽覺障礙學生爲例。身心障礙研究季刊，5(2)，90-107。
   連結：
4. 陳言劼、鄭溫暖、廖盈姿(2013)。地板滾球運動介入對腦性麻痺者之休閒效益。大專體育學刊，15(3)，359-373。
   連結：
5. 楊欣諭、孫瑋翎、林信佑、黃志杰(2013)。特奧滾球與地板滾球比較之初探。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊，12(3)，293-301。
   連結：
6. 潘倩玉(2011)。同儕教導之成效及其在融合式體育課程之實務應用。中華體育季刊，25(1)，129-138。
   連結：
7. Bowman-Perrott, L.(2009).Classwide peer tutoring: An effective strategy for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Intervention in School and Clinic,44,259-267.
8. Bowman-Perrott, L. J.,Greenwood, C. R.,Tapia, Y.(2007).The efficacy of CWPT used in secondary alternative school classrooms with small teacher/pupil ratios and students with emotional and behavioral disorders.Education and Treatment of Children,30(3),65-87.
9. Candler, A. C.,Blackburn, G. M.,Sowell, V.(1981).Peer tutoring as a strategy individualizing instruction.Education,101(4),380-383.
10. Ehly, S. W.,Larsen, S. C.(1980).Peer tutoring for individualized instruction.Boston, MA:Ally and Bacon Inc.
11. Fong, D. T.,Yam, K.,Chu, V. W.,Cheung, R. T.,Chan, K.(2012).Upper limb muscle fatigue during prolonged Boccia games with underarm throwing technique.Sports Biomechanics,11(4),441-451.
12. Hashimoto, K.,Utley, C. A.,Greenwood, C. R.,Pitchlyn, C. L.(2007).The effects of modified classwide peer tutoring procedures on the generalization of spelling skills of urban third-grade elementary students.Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal,5(2),1-29.
13. Huang, P. C.,Pan, P. J.,Ou, Y. C.,Yu, Y. C.,Tsai, Y. S.(2014).Motion analysis of throwing Boccia balls in children with cerebral palsy.Research in Developmental Disabilities,35(2),393-399.
14. Kazdin, A. E.(2011).Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
15. Klavina, A.,Block, M. E.(2008).The effect of peer tutoring on interaction behaviors in inclusive physical education.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,25(2),132-158.
16. Mcduffie, K. A.,Mastropieri, M. A.,Scruggs, T. E.(2009).Differential effects of peer tutoring in co-taught and non-co-taught classes: Results for content learning and student-teacher interactions.Exceptional Children,75,493-510.
17. Morriss, L.,Wittmannová, J.(2010).The effect of blocked versus random training schedules on Boccia skills performance in experienced athletes with cerebral palsy.European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity,3(2),17-28.
18. Myrick, R. D.,Highland, W. H.(1995).Peer helpers and perceived effectiveness.Elementary School Guidance & Counseling,29,278-289.
19. Simpkins, P. M.,Mastropieri, M. A.,Scruggs, T. E.(2009).Differentiated curriculum enhancements in inclusive fifth-grade science classes.Remedial and Special Education,30,300-308.
20. Strickland, J.(2005).Peer tutoring as an instructional methodology to improve fundamental movement skills.ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal,52(2),22-26.
21. Tawney, J. W.,Gast, D. L.(1984).Single subject research in special education.Columbus, OH:Charles E. Merrill.
22. Topping, K.(1988).The peer tutoring handbook: Promoting cooperative learning.London:Croom Helm.
23. Tryon, W. W.(1982).A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,15,423-429.
24. Tsai, Y. S.,Yu, Y. C.,Huang, P. C.,Cheng, H. Y. K.(2014).Seat surface inclination may affect postural stability during boccia ball throwing in children with cerebral palsy.Research in Developmental Disabilities,35(12),3568-3573.
25. Van Norman, R. K.(2007)."Who's on First?" Using sports trivia peer tutoring to increase conversational language.Intervention in School & Clinic,43(2),88-100.
26. Ward, P.,Ayvazo, S.(2006).Classwide peer tutoring in physical education: Assessing its effect with kindergartners with autism.Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly,23,233-244.
27. 孟瑛如(2013)。資源教室方案：班級經營與補救教學。臺北市:五南。
28. 林士殷、李映萱(2010)。同儕教導在智能障礙學生學習日常生活技能之設計應用。雲嘉特教期刊，12，33-42。
29. 教育部(2010)。特殊教育課程教材教法及評量方式實施辦法。臺北市：教育部。
30. 莊臆鈴、林坤燦、郭又方(2013)。普通學生同儕教導對增進國小智障學生生活技能及同儕接納之成效研究。東臺灣特殊教育學報，15，89-119。
31. 程德華、李詠慈(2006)。地板滾球對腦性麻痺學生在學校功能表現之關係。臺北市:臺北市教師研習中心。
32. 鈕文英、吳裕益(2015)。單一個案研究法—研究設計與後設分析。臺北市:心理。
33. 董媛卿(1994)。補救教學—資源教室的運作。臺北市:五南。
34. 劉金枝(1997)。地板滾球（Boccia）─重度及極重度腦性麻痺者的新契機（下）。臺北市肢體殘障運動雜誌，一月號，11-16。
35. 滕德政(2004)。適應體育教學。臺北市:師大師苑。
36. 蔡郁辰、王文宜(2014)。體育課同儕教學之文獻分析。休閒與社會研究，10，151-161。

1. 葉家伶,陳志軒,佘永吉(2022)。地板滾球課程介入對三位輕度智能障礙國中生身體協調功能之提升觀察紀錄。身心障礙研究季刊，20(1)，87-103。
2. 張芳慈(2021)。球類活動對智能障礙學生視覺動作整合的影響。教育科學研究期刊，66(1)，231-274。
3. 鍾佳蓁,歐陽佳琪,陳玉枝,許安,張原豪(2020)。以文獻分析法回顧適應體育領域融合與非融合式教育教學策略研究。臺東大學體育學報，33，1-16。