题名

優秀高中啦啦隊選手知覺教練領導與團隊凝聚力之研究

并列篇名

A Study of Leadership Styles and Team Cohesion of Elite Senior High School Cheerleading Competition

DOI

10.29429/JSLHR.200703_2(1).05

作者

黃惠芝(Hui-Tzu Huang);林仁彬(Zen-Pin Lin);陳奕伸(I-Shen Chen)

关键词

啦啦隊 ; 教練領導 ; 凝聚 ; Cheerleading ; leadership and cohesion

期刊名称

運動休閒餐旅研究

卷期/出版年月

2卷1期(2007 / 03 / 01)

页次

73 - 80

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

這項研究的主要目的在探討高中啦啦隊之教練領導行為和團隊凝聚力之間的關係。受試者為2006年全國高中啦啦隊比賽之前三名選手,女生34名及男生16名的學生。全部50位完成二份問卷︰運動領導行為(LSS)和團隊凝聚力(GEQ)。所得資料經過,相依t檢定、獨立t檢定,單因子變異量數分析。其結果如下:一、高中啦啦隊選手知覺的教練領導行為,依序為:訓練與指導、社會支持、正面回饋、民主行為、專制行為。選手之教練領導,喜愛較多的訓練與指導、民主行為。女生顯著高於男生之訓練與指導及民主行為。二、啦啦隊選手知覺的團隊凝聚力,依序為團體合作、個人親和、團隊適應、個人吸引。三、良好的訓練指導對於團隊合作有正面的幫助。建議加強訓練與指導及民主行為,對於團隊合作與運動表現會有更好幫助。

英文摘要

The main purpose of this research was to investigate senior high student's leadership behavior and cohesiveness. The subjects were 16 female and 34 male collegiate student. Fifty participants of senior high students finish two questionnaires: Leadership Scale Sports lead the behavior (LSS) and group's cohesiveness (GEQ). The data was analyzed by dependence t-test, independent t-test and one way ANOVA. The result was as follows: The order of LSS: training instruction, social support, positive feedback, and autocratic behavior. Player prefer more training instruction and DB. Female was significant higher than training instruction and DB. The order of GEQ: GIT, ATGS, GIS and ATGT. It's meaningful and helpful for student and coach to improve team cohesion and sport performance.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
社會科學 > 體育學
参考文献
  1. 蔡佳蓉(2003)。論國小階段推展競技啦啦隊運動之合宜性。中華體育,18(2),20-26。
    連結:
  2. 鄭麗媛、麥秀英(2002)。校園啦啦隊競賽意見調查研究。體育學報,33(2),191-198。
    連結:
  3. Bollen, K. A.,Hoyle, R. H.(1990).Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination.Social Forces,69,479-504.
  4. Bompa, T. O.(1983).Theory and methodology of training: The key to athletic performance.Dubuque, IA:Kendall.
  5. Carron, A. V.,Widmeyer, W. N.,Brawley, L. R.(1985).The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire.Journal of Sport Psychology,7,244-266.
  6. Chelladurai, P.,Saleh, S. D.(1980).Dimensions of leadership behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale.Journal of Sport Psychology,2,34-45.
  7. Gardner, D. E.,Shields, D. L.,Bredemeir, B. J.,Bostrom, A.(1996).The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and team cohesion among baseball and softball players.The Sport Psychologist,10,367-381.
  8. Horn, T. S. (Ed.)(1992).Advances in sport psychology.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
  9. Martens, R.(1987).Coaches guide to sport psychology.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
  10. Riemer, H. A.(1991).Leadership behavior preferences of intercollegiate football players.
  11. Terry, P. C.(1984).The coaching preferences of elite athletes competing at Universade '83.Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,9,201-208.
  12. Terry, P. C.,Howe, B. L.(1984).Coaching preferences of athletes.Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,9,188-193.
  13. Westre, K.,Weiss, M.(1991).The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and group cohesion in high school football teams.The Sport Psychologist,5,41-54.
  14. Widmeyer, W. N.,Carron, A. V.,Brawley, L. R.(1993).Handbook of research on sport psychology.New York:Macmillan.
  15. 張育銓(1999)。啦啦隊活動之探討。國民體育季刊,28(1),127-135。
  16. 楊綺儷(1994)。大專啦啦隊的組訓與編排。大專體育,13,52-58。
被引用次数
  1. 黃美華,莊淑蘭(2013)。大專學生參與校園啦啦隊錦標賽隱憂之探討。興大體育學刊,12,141-152。
  2. 廖焜福、張家銘、孫美蓮、吳浩瑀(2018)。教練與選手關係對運動員運動涉入之影響。交大體育學刊,14,11-21。