题名

創意生活產業遊客滿意屬性矩陣之研究-以飛牛牧場爲例

并列篇名

A Research on Customer-Satisfaction Attribute Matrix of Creative Life Industries-A Case Study of Flyingcow Ranch

DOI

10.29429/JSLHR.201103_6(1).05

作者

鍾政偉(Cheng-Wei Chung)

关键词

滿意屬性矩陣 ; 創意生活產業 ; IPA分析法 ; Satisfaction Attribute Matrix ; Creative Life Industry ; IPA analysis

期刊名称

運動休閒餐旅研究

卷期/出版年月

6卷1期(2011 / 03 / 01)

页次

66 - 78

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究在探討創意生活產業的遊客滿意屬性矩陣並以飛牛牧場爲取樣地點,依據創意生活產業的定義中延伸出本研究的滿意屬性矩陣構面包含:核心知識、深度體驗及高質美感。本研究共回收有效問卷347份,透過MANOVA分析、t檢定及IPA分析得出本研究結果。1.遊客個人屬性的差異對滿意矩陣的重視程度及滿意程度具有顯著差異。2.透過IPA分析法可發現飛牛牧場所提供的服務或產品中,並無落於高重視低滿意的(加強改善區),顯示其服務品質具有一定水準以上。3.從個人屬性與滿意屬性的分析內容,可以發現婚姻狀況、教育程度及職業具有深入討論的價值。

英文摘要

Being based on Flyingcow Ranch, the aim of the research is to discuss the customer-satisfaction attribute matrix of creative life industries. According to the definition of creative life industries, the customer-satisfaction attribute matrix can be extended into: the core knowledge, in-depth experiences and high quality aesthetics. There were 347 valid questionnaires responded. Through the analyses of MANOVA, t-test and IPA analysis, it is found: (1). The personal attribute differences shows significant differences from the importance and satisfaction of customer-satisfaction attribute matrix. (2). According to IPA, the services and the products from Flyingcow Ranch do not fall to the area where it is needed to be improved. That is to say, the quality of its services reaches a certain level. (3). From personal and satisfaction attribute, it can be discovered that it is worthy to discuss the further variables, marital status, level of education and occupation.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
社會科學 > 體育學
参考文献
  1. 文化創意產業推動組織 (2003 )。文化創意產業發展現況,http://www.cci.org.tw/portal/plan/what.asp。
  2. 范子凡(2003)。從Artkey 談藝術文化財的授權與交易,取自CASE 網路學院:http://www.cca.gov.tw/ case
  3. Cardozo, R. N.(1965).An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation and Satisfaction.Journal of Marketing Research,2,244-249.
  4. Chapman, R. G.(1993).Brand performance comparatives.Journal of Products &Brand Management,2(1),42-50.
  5. Chu, R. K. S.,Choi, T.(2000).An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factorsn in the Hong Kong hotel industry: A comparison of business and leisure travelers.Tourism Management,21,363-377.
  6. Fornell, C.(1992).A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience.Journal of Marketing,56(1),6-21.
  7. Kolter, P.(1994).Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control (7th Ed.).New York:Prentice-Hall.
  8. Kozak, M.,Nield, K.(1998).Importance-performance analysis and cultural perspectives in Romanian Black Sea resorts.Anatolia International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research,9(2),99-116.
  9. Martilla, J. A.,James, J. C.(1977).Importance-Performance Analysis.Journal of Marketing,41(1),77-79.
  10. Sethna, B. N.(1982).Extension & testing of importance-performance analysis.Business Economics,17(4),28-31.
  11. 行政院經濟建設委員會(2002)。文化創意產業概況分析調查。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
  12. 周能傳、詹偉雄(2005)。創意生活產業魔法書。台北市:典藏藝術家庭。
  13. 施顏祥(2002)。文化創意產業發展計劃-挑戰2008國家重點發展計劃。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會。
  14. 黃俊英(2000)。多變量分析(第七版)。台北市:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。
被引用次数
  1. 丘昌泰(2015)。體驗經濟與桃園創意生活產業的發展策略。國家與社會,17,51-80。