祐德高中不同學年度入學新生健康體適能差異比較

A Comparison of Health-related Physical Fitness of You De High School's New Students of Different Years

10.29429/JSLHR.201509_10(3).02

李政雄(Zheng-Xiong Li)；陳金海(King-Hai Chen)；張世沛(Shih-Pei Chang)；陳振幫(Zhen-Help Chen)

祐德高中 ； 新生 ； 體適能 ； you de high school ； new student ； physical fitness

運動休閒餐旅研究

10卷3期（2015 / 09 / 01）

21 - 33

繁體中文

本研究目的在比較祐德高中不同學年度新生健康體適能的差異狀況，以做為推展本校學生體適能活動及體育教學之參考。本研究以99、100、101學年度入學新生767名（男生448名、女生319名）為研究對象，測驗方法是採用教育部所訂定之方法為標準，項目包括身高、體重、身體質量指數、坐姿體前彎、屈膝仰臥起坐、立定跳遠、跑走（男生1600公尺，女生800公尺），所得之各項成績資料以描述性統計、單因子變異數分析等統計方法進行分析。研究結果顯示：祐德高中不同學年度男生體適能差異比較：身體質量指數、坐姿體前彎、屈膝仰臥起坐、立定跳遠、跑走等項目在三個學年度間差異都未達顯著水準。不同學年度女生體適能差異比較：在坐姿體前彎方面，100學年度顯著優於99學年度，在仰臥起坐方面，100學年度顯著優於99學年度，在立定跳遠方面，100學年度、101學年度顯著優於99學年度，其餘體適能項目在三個學年度間差異都未達顯著水準。結論：祐德高中不同學年度學生體適能差異比較，在男生方面沒有顯著差異，在女生方面，99學年度學生顯著普遍表現較差。

Objective: To conduct a comparison of health-related physical fitness of You De High School's new students of different years for a reference of the school's physical fitness activities and PE teaching. Method: This study used a total of 767 new students (448 male students, 319 female students) of years 2010, 2011, and 2012 as the subject, and based on methods developed by the Ministry of Education as the test standard whilst items include height, weight, BMI (body mass index), sit and reach, bent-knee sit-up, standing broad jump, and run-walk (1600 meters for boys, 800 meters for girls), and findings were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation), one-way analysis of variance, and others. Results: A comparison of health-related physical fitness of boys of different years: Variation among items such as BMI, sit and reach, bent-knee sit-up, standing broad jump, and run-walk did not reach a significant level within three school years. A comparison of health-related fitness of girls of different years: In terms of sit and reach, students of the year 2011 were significantly better than students of the year 2010. In terms of sit-up, students of years 2011 and 2012 were significantly better than students of the year 2010. In terms of standing broad jump, students of the year 2011 were significantly better than students of the year 2010. As for the rest items, the difference in the three school years did not reach a significant level. Conclusion: In terms of health-related fitness among You De High School students of different years, no significant difference was found among boys, but among girls, the performance of students of the year 2010 was significantly poorer. Suggestion: In the future, the design of PE teaching and activity contents should emphasize on courses related to enhancement of students' health-related fitness including flexibility, muscular strength and endurance.

1. 教育部（ 2012 ）。健康體適能網站， 2012 年6 月1 日， 取自：http://www.fitness.org.tw/direct01.php。
2. Capersen, C. J.,Powell, K. E.,Christiansen, G. M.(1985).Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research.Public Health Report,100,126-131.
3. Greenberg, J. S.,Pargman, D.(1986).Physical fitness: A Wellness Approach.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc..
4. Hsu, I. R.,Kim, S. P.,Kabir, M.,Bergman, R. N.(2007).Metabolic syndrome, hyperinsulinemia, and cancer.The American journal of clinical nutrition,86,867-871.
5. Lamb, D. R.(1984).Physiology of Exercise: Responses and Adaptations.New York:Macmillan Publishing Co.
6. Takase, H.,Dohi, Y.,Toriyama, T.,Okado, T.,Tanaka, S.,Sato, K.(2008).Metabolic disorders predict development of hypertension in normotensive Japanese subjects.Hypertension research,31(4),665-671.
7. 方進隆(1993)。健康體能的理論與實際。台北市:漢文書局。
8. 方進隆(1995)。體適能推展策略與未來研究方向。中華體育季刊，12(3)，70-77。
9. 方進隆編(1997)。教師健康體適能指導手冊。台北市:教育部體育司。
10. 國立台灣師範大學學校體育研究與發展中心編(1997)。教師體適能指導手冊。
11. 莊逸萍、陳信吉(1997)。國立台南師範學院八十四、八十五學年度入學新生體適能之比較。南師體育，5，92-119。
12. 程瑞福(2007)。「快樂運動活出健康」－啟動活力校園的政策與意義。學校體育，17(4)，10-17。

1. 陳奕仁,陳俊吉,陳金海(2020)。六信高中不同年級學生體適能比較。長榮運動休閒學刊，14，36-44。