國民小學學生人格特質與參與休閒活動類型之相關研究

Investigating the Relationship between Elementary School Students’ Personality and Leisure Participation

10.29429/JSLHR.201606_11(2).03

陳姚伶(Yao-Lin Chen)；黃于庭(Yu-Ting Huang)；許世芸(Shih-Yun Hsu)；許志賢(Chih-Chien Hsu)

國小學生 ； 人格特質 ； 休閒活動 ； elementary school students ； personality ； leisure activities

運動休閒餐旅研究

11卷2期（2016 / 06 / 01）

43 - 69

繁體中文

本研究旨在瞭解國民小學學生人格特質和參與休閒活動類型之相關情形。以南投縣南投市與草屯鎮公立國民小學學生為研究對象，採叢集取樣方式實施問卷調查，以自編的「國小學生人格特質和休閒活動類型相關之研究問卷」為研究工具。共發出問卷455 份，回收之有效問卷426 份，有效量表回收率為93.6%。為達本研究目的及考驗假設之需，將回收之有效樣本以描述統計、項目分析、探索性因素分析、獨立樣本t 考驗、單因子變異數分析、雪費事後比較、Pearson 積差相關等統計方法進行資料分析。結果發現：一、國民小學學生整體人格特質最傾向「經驗開放性」，最不具「情緒敏感性」；整體休閒活動參與頻率較偏屬中高程度，以「娛樂類」活動的參與頻率最高，而「藝文類」活動參與頻率最低。二、不同性別、父母教育程度、每月家庭總收入等的國民小學學生在人格特質上有顯著差異。三、不同性別、父母教育程度、每月家庭總收入等的國民小學學生在參與休閒活動上有顯著差異。四、國民小學學生的人格特質和休閒活動參與呈顯著相關。

This study aims at understanding the relationship between the personality of elementary school students and the types of leisure activities they participate in. The study takes the elementary school students of Nantou City and Tsaotun Town of Nantou County as the study objects. A self-developed questionnaire is used in the survey. sure activities involvement are noticeably related. 426 out of 455 questionnaires distributed are collected, with a return rate of 93.6%. Descriptive statistics, item analysis, factor analysis, t-test, oneway ANOVA, Scheffé post comparison, and Pearson product-moment correlation are utilized to analyze the data. The major findings of the study include: 1. Most of the elementary school students belong to the type of ＂open to experience＂ and the least of them belong to that of ＂Neuroticism＂. The frequency of their participation in leisure activities tends to be middle to high level. They participate in ＂entertainment＂ type of activities the most and in ＂art＂ type of activities the least. 2. The personality of elementary school students varies greatly based on different genders, parents' educational levels, and average monthly household incomes. 3. The types of the leisure activities they chose to participate in also remarkably vary based on different genders, parents' educational levels, and average monthly household incomes. 4. Personality and the types of lei sure activities involvement are noticeably related.

1. Bureau of labor Statistics (2010). American time use survey-2009 results. retrieved on April 10, 2011, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus.pdf.
2. Allport, G. W.(1961).Pattern and Growth in Personality.New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
3. Bammel, C.,Burrus-Bammel, L. L.(1992).Leisure and human behavior.Dubuque, IA:Wm. C. Brown Publishers.
4. Brajsa-Zganec, A.,Merkas, M.,Sverko, I.(2011).Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being?.Social Indicators Research,102(1),81-91.
5. Chubb, M.,Chubb, H.(1981).One Third of Our Time?.New York:Willy.
6. Costa, P. T.,McCrae, R. R.(1985).The NEO Personality Inventory Manual.Odessa, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.
7. Godbey, Geoffrey、葉怡矜譯、吳崇旗譯、王偉琴譯、顏伽如譯、林禹良譯(2005)。休閒遊憩概論─探索生命中的休閒。台北市:品度股份有限公司。
8. Goldberg, L. R.(1992).The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.Psychological Assessment,4(1),26-42.
9. Kelly, J. R.(1996).Leisure Needham Heughts.MA:A Simon & Sohuster Company.
10. Maccoby, E. E.(1992).The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview.Developmental Psychology,28(6),1006-1017.
11. Main, A.(1980).Encouraging effective learning.New York:Macmillan.
12. Norman, W. T.(1963).Toward and adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,66,574-583.
13. Parker, S.(1971).The future of work and Leisure.London:Mac Gibbon and Kee.
14. Phares, E. J.,Chaplin, W. F.(1997).Introduction to personality.New York:Longman.
15. Piedmont, R. L.,McCrae, R. R.,Costa, P. T.(1991).Adjective Check List Scales and the Five-Factor Model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60(4),630-637.
16. Roy, D. D.(1995).Differences in personality factors of experienced teacher, physicians, bank managers and fine artists.Psychological Studies,40(1),51-56.
17. Russell, R. V.(1982).Planning programs in recreation.St. Louis:Mosby.
18. Schultz, D. P.,Schultz, S. E.(1998).Theories of Personality.Pacific Grove, CA:Books/Cole.
19. Wiggins, J. S.(Ed.)(1997).The Five Factor Model Personality.New York:Gilford Press.
20. 余明書(2006)。台北，東吳大學社會學系。
21. 李仲廣、盧昌崇(2004)。基礎休閒學。北京:北京社會科學文獻出版社。
22. 張春興(1995)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
23. 許志賢(2002)。休閒活動介入生活的認知與技巧之探討。國立臺灣體育學院學報，11，51-60。
24. 許志賢(2002)。台中，國立台灣體育學院體育研究所。
25. 郭亭亞、王逸峰、謝秀雄(2011)。人格特質、社群網站、休閒活動關係之初探。商業現代化學刊，6(2)，29-42。
26. 黃任閔、吳昭璇(2010)。國小學童休閒活動參與之探討。2010 年第三屆運動科學暨休閒遊憩管理學術研討會論文集
27. 葉智魁(2006)。休閒研究─休閒觀與休閒專論。臺北市:品度。