臺大羽球課程專項體能測驗評價與自覺運動量之研究

A Study on the Fitness and Self-Perceived Exertion Rate of Students Taking the Badminton Class at National Taiwan University

10.6569/NTUJPE.200503_(7).0001

陳振文(Chen-Wen Chen)

專項體能 ； 自覺運動量 ； 米字形步法移位

臺大體育學報

7輯（2005 / 03 / 01）

1 - 38

繁體中文

The subjects participating in this study were the 72 students taking the elementary badminton class in the second semester of the 2000 academic year at National Taiwan University. During the last two weeks of the course, the students underwent two fitness tests, which required them to complete the star route footwork drill five times in succession, and after the second test the students were asked to complete a questionaire on their perceived rate of exertion in the footwork drill test. The average of the two test results was calculated for each student and points were awarded on the basis of their personal results in comparison to the mean for the whole group. The results were further sorted into three groups (good, average, inferior) based on level of fitness, and then compared to the results from the perceived rate of exertion questionaire. We regard the star route footwork drill as a good test of fitness for the sport of volleyball. To obtain greater credibility in the results, the test was given on two separate occassions and analysed using the pearson's product-moment coefficient of correlation method. Each student completed the footwork drill five times in succession, and the time taken for each drill was analysed using a One-way Anova. Points awarded to each student were based on a T score calculated from the test results. The results from the perceived rate of exertion questionaire were sorted into three groups (good, average, inferior) based on level of fitness and put to a One-way Anova test. The conclusions obtained from this analysis were as follows: 1.In a comparison between the results obtained from the two separate tests, coefficient of correlation (r) was shown to be α=.01. Thus the results obtained from the star route footwork drill can be regarded as quite reliable. 2.In a comparison of the results for each student from the five consecutive drill tests, it was seen that the time taken to complete each test increased each time (p＜.01). 3.A normal range of grades was obtained when using this test as a basis for grading students. 4.After completion of the first, fourth and fifth footwork drill test, the self-perceived rate of exertion did not reach a clear standard (p＞0.5) for students in all three levels of fitness. 5.After completion of the second and third footwork drill test, the self-perceived rate of exertion reached a clear standard (p＜0.1) for students in all three levels of fitness.

The subjects participating in this study were the 72 students taking the elementary badminton class in the second semester of the 2000 academic year at National Taiwan University. During the last two weeks of the course, the students underwent two fitness tests, which required them to complete the star route footwork drill five times in succession, and after the second test the students were asked to complete a questionaire on their perceived rate of exertion in the footwork drill test. The average of the two test results was calculated for each student and points were awarded on the basis of their personal results in comparison to the mean for the whole group. The results were further sorted into three groups (good, average, inferior) based on level of fitness, and then compared to the results from the perceived rate of exertion questionaire. We regard the star route footwork drill as a good test of fitness for the sport of volleyball. To obtain greater credibility in the results, the test was given on two separate occassions and analysed using the pearson's product-moment coefficient of correlation method. Each student completed the footwork drill five times in succession, and the time taken for each drill was analysed using a One-way Anova. Points awarded to each student were based on a T score calculated from the test results. The results from the perceived rate of exertion questionaire were sorted into three groups (good, average, inferior) based on level of fitness and put to a One-way Anova test. The conclusions obtained from this analysis were as follows: 1.In a comparison between the results obtained from the two separate tests, coefficient of correlation (r) was shown to be α=.01. Thus the results obtained from the star route footwork drill can be regarded as quite reliable. 2.In a comparison of the results for each student from the five consecutive drill tests, it was seen that the time taken to complete each test increased each time (p＜.01). 3.A normal range of grades was obtained when using this test as a basis for grading students. 4.After completion of the first, fourth and fifth footwork drill test, the self-perceived rate of exertion did not reach a clear standard (p＞0.5) for students in all three levels of fitness. 5.After completion of the second and third footwork drill test, the self-perceived rate of exertion reached a clear standard (p＜0.1) for students in all three levels of fitness.

1. Anastasi, A.(1988)。Psychological testing。NY:Macmillan。
2. Bar-Or(1972).Physiological and Pereptual Indicators of Physical Stress in 41 to 60 years old men who very in Conditioning Level and in Body Fates.Medicine and Science in Sports,4(2),85-100.
3. Baumgartner, T. A.、Jackson, A. S.(1983)。Measurement for evaluation in physical education。Iowa:Wm. C. Brown。
4. Birk, T. J.、Birk, C. A.(1987)。Use of ratings of perceived exertion for exercise prescription。Sports Medicine，4，1-8。
5. Borg, G.,Linderholm, H.(1967).Perceived Exertion and Pulse Reat during Graded Exercise in Various Age Groups.Acta Medicine of Scandinavian Supplement,472,193-206.
6. Borg, Gunnar A. V.(1970).Perceived exertion as an indicator of Somatic Stress.Scandinavia Journal Rehabilitation Medicine,2,92-98.
7. Docktor R.,Sharkey B. J.(1971).Note on Some Physiological and Subjective Teaction to Exercise and Training.Perceptual Rotor Skills,32,233-234.
8. Eckert, H. M.(1974).Practical measurement of physical performance.Philadelphia:Lea & Febiger.
9. Glass, S. C.、Knowlton, R. G.、Becque, M. D.(1992)。Accuracy of RPE from graded exercise to establish exercise training intensity。Med. Sci. Spotes Exerc.，24(11)，1301-1307。
10. Gordon, M. J.、Goslin, B. R.、Graham, T.、Hoare, J.(1983)。Comparison between Load Carriage and Grade Talking on a Treadmill。Ergonomics，26(3)，289。
11. Grimby, G.(1972).Work Capacity and Physiological Responses to work.American Journal of Cardiology,30,37-142.
12. Jensen, C. R.,Hirst, C. C.(1980).Measurement in physical education and athletics.NY:Macmillan.
13. Johnson, B. L.、Nelson, J. K.(1979)。Practical measurements for evaluation in physical education。NY:Macmillan。
14. Kirkendall, D. R.、Gruber, J. J.、Johnson, R. E.(1988)。Measurement and evaluation for physical education。Illinois:Human Kinetics。
15. Linderholm H.(1967).Experience from training of conscripts.Forvars-Medicine,3,188-191.
16. Mihevic, P. M.(1981)。Sensory cues for perceived exertion: a review。Med sci. Sports exerc.，13(3)，150-163。
17. Montoye, H. J.(1978).An introducation to measurement in physical education.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
18. Morgan, W. P.(1974).Prediction of Maximal Work Capacity from Submaximal Ratings of Perceived Exertion and Heart Rate.Medicine and Science in Sport,6(1),66.
19. Noble, B. J.(1973).Perceptual Tesponses to Exercise: a multiple regression study.Medicine and Science in Sports,5(2),104-109.
20. Pavlina, Z.,Saric, I.(1974).The Interrelationship among Three Measure of Physical Stress: absolute heart rate, relative heart rate and ratings of perceived effort.Report of Institiute of Applied Psychology,56,1-10.
21. Phillips, D. A.、Hornak, J. E(1979)。Measurement and evaluation in physical education。NY:John Wiley and Sons。
22. Roger, G. S.,Goldmen, R. F.(1973).Racing of Intermittent Work during 31 Hours.Medicine and Science in Sports,5(2),128-131.
23. Skinner, J. S.,Hustler, R.,Bergesteinova, V.,Buskirk, E. R.(1973).Perception of effort during different types of exercise and under different environmental conditions.Medecine Science Sport,5,110-115.
24. Stamford, B. A.(1976).Validity and reliability of subjective ratings of perceived exertion during work.Ergonomics,19,53-60.
25. Stevens, S. S.,S. S. Stevens(ed)(1951).Handbook of experimental psychology.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
26. Ueda, T.、Kurokawa, T.(1991)。Validity of heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion as indicated of exercise intesnsity in a group of children while swimming。Eur. J. Appl. Physiol，63，200-204。
27. Verducci, F. M.(1980)。Measurement concepts in physical education。St. Louis:C. V. Mosby。
28. 朱智賢(1989)。心理學大辭典。北京師範大學。
29. 吳忠貫譯(1988)。運動計量學。人民體育出版社。
30. 林恆山(1977)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學體育研究所。
31. 林清山(1976)。心理與教育統計學。台北市:東華。
32. 孫宜芬(1984)。羽球技能測驗之研究。國立台灣師範大學體育學會。
33. 國立台灣大學訓導處體育組編(1993)。國立台灣大學體育成績評量參考手冊。
34. 張至滿(1986)。體育測量與評價。水牛:
35. 張春興(1989)。張氏心理辭典。東華書局。
36. 教育部編印(1964)。專科以上體育實施方案。台北市:教育部。
37. 教育部體育大辭典編訂委員會(1984)。體育大辭典。台北市:商務印書館。
38. 莊美玲(1985)。國立台灣師範大學體育學系女生羽球技能測驗之研究。國立台舉師範大學體育學會。
39. 郭生玉(1981)。心理與教育研究法。精華書局。
40. 陳英豪、吳裕益(1982)。測驗的編製與應用。偉文圖書公司。
41. 黃元齡(1982)。心理與教育測驗的理論與方法。大中國圖書公司。
42. 黃明祥(2001)。台中市國立台灣體育學院。
43. 黃明祥(1995)。體育專科男生羽球運動技能表現因素的分析與預測。澤偉有限公司。
44. 楊基榮(1971)。體育測驗與統計。台北市:國立編譯館。
45. 葛樹人(1987)。心理測驗學。桂冠:
46. 蔡敏忠(1968)。中華民國青少年體能現況研究與體能標准訂定。台北市:中華民國。
47. 蔡敏忠(1966)。國際標準體能適應測驗委員會。體育研究季刊，8
48. 蔡敏忠譯(1967)。國際標準體能適應測驗委員會規章。體育研究季刊
49. 鄭清滿(1989)。五專男生羽球測驗項目之編製研究。美新:

1. 陳振文(2006)。男子羽球米字形步法移位與單打排名賽之相關研究。臺大體育學報，9，55-80。
2. 龔雅慈,鄭鴻衛,蔣明雄,廖學松,紀世清(2021)。羽球女子選手專項運動技能測驗之研究。臺灣體育學術研究，70，1-17。
3. 邱文信、林希彥、王志全(2015)。大專羽球體育課程運動技能測驗之研究─以反手拍發短球為例。成大體育，47(2)，24-37。