體育課必修與選修學生在運動自我設限行爲之差異

Differences on Self-handicapping Behaviour between Students Taking Required-and elective-classes

10.6569/NTUJPE.200503_(7).0006

王澤惠(Che-Hui Wang)

自我設限 ； 目標取向 ； 自尊 ； 歸因 ； 體育課 ； self-handicapping ； goal orientation ； self esteem ； attribution PE class

臺大體育學報

7輯（2005 / 03 / 01）

127 - 148

繁體中文

Previous researches on self-handicapping behaviour indicated that goal-orientation, self-esteem and attribution are the major factors having predominant effects. To understand the level of influence of these three factors on the self-handicapping behaviour of students taking required-class (RC) and elective-class (EC), the present study conducts a systematic survey for 340 students, in which 170 students take required-class and 164 students take elective-class, to investigate the differences of these two groups of students on the performance in terms of the effort-reduction (ER) type and the excuse-making (EM) type self-handicapping behaviours. Each student is requested to fill four questionnaires, they are the goal-orientation scale, the sport self-handicapping scale, the self-esteem scale, and the attribution scale, and finally a regression is made to analyze these data. Results illustrate that, firstly, for the ER type self-handicapping behaviour the RC students are more serious than the EC students; similar conclusion is reached for the EM type self-handicapping behaviour, although the difference of latter is smaller. Secondly, the influence factors of the RC and EC students diverse: The RC students are influenced significantly by the goal-orientation while the EC students are affected by both the goal-orientation and the self-esteem. Thirdly, for the EC students, all the factors, including the major factors such as goal-orientation and self-esteem, and the minor factors such as exercise-factor, luckiness-factor, and difficulty-level factor, have significant influence on the self-handicapping behaviour.

Previous researches on self-handicapping behaviour indicated that goal-orientation, self-esteem and attribution are the major factors having predominant effects. To understand the level of influence of these three factors on the self-handicapping behaviour of students taking required-class (RC) and elective-class (EC), the present study conducts a systematic survey for 340 students, in which 170 students take required-class and 164 students take elective-class, to investigate the differences of these two groups of students on the performance in terms of the effort-reduction (ER) type and the excuse-making (EM) type self-handicapping behaviours. Each student is requested to fill four questionnaires, they are the goal-orientation scale, the sport self-handicapping scale, the self-esteem scale, and the attribution scale, and finally a regression is made to analyze these data. Results illustrate that, firstly, for the ER type self-handicapping behaviour the RC students are more serious than the EC students; similar conclusion is reached for the EM type self-handicapping behaviour, although the difference of latter is smaller. Secondly, the influence factors of the RC and EC students diverse: The RC students are influenced significantly by the goal-orientation while the EC students are affected by both the goal-orientation and the self-esteem. Thirdly, for the EC students, all the factors, including the major factors such as goal-orientation and self-esteem, and the minor factors such as exercise-factor, luckiness-factor, and difficulty-level factor, have significant influence on the self-handicapping behaviour.

1. 王澤惠(2003)。目標取向、自尊及歸因型態對運動員自我設限行爲之影響。台灣運動心理學報，3，1-20。
   連結：
2. 吳佳輝、王澤惠、林以正(2004)。運動自我設限量表之探索性與驗證性因素分析。大專體育學刊，6(1)，1-10。
   連結：
3. 李郁文(2003)。從輔導的觀點談孩子行爲的「自尊」表現。諮商與輔導，209，37-42。
   連結：
4. Bachman, G. J.(1979).Self-esteem and education: sex and cohort comparsions among high school senior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37,1153-1159.
5. Bachman, G. J.,O'' Malley, P. M.(1977).Self-esteem in young men: a longitudinal analysis of the impact of educational and occupational attainment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,35,365-379.
6. Bergias, S.(1985).Self-handicapping and self-handicapper: A cognitive/attributional model of interpersonal self-protective behavior.Perspectives in Personality,1,235-270.
7. Berglas, S.,Jones, E. E.(1978).Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36,405-417.
8. Carron, A. V.,Prapavessis, H.,Grove, J. R.(1994).Group effects and self-handicapping.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,16,246-257.
9. Duda, J. L.(1989).The relationship between task and ego orientation and the perceived purpose of sport among male and female high school athletes.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,11,318-335.
10. Duda, J. L.,Nicholls, J. G.(1991).The task and ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties, Unpublished manuscript.
11. Duda, J. L.,Nicholls. J. G.(1992).Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport.Journal of Educational Psychology,84,1-10.
12. Hausenblas, H. A.,Carron, A. V.(1996).Group cohesion and self-handicapping in female and male athletes.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,18,132-143.
13. Jones, E. E.,Berglas, S.(1978).Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and role of underachievement.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,4,200-206.
14. Nicholls, J. G.(1989).The competitive ethos and democratic education.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University.
15. Nicholls, J. G.,Patashnick, M.,Nole, S. B.(1985).Adolescent's theories of education.Journal of Educational Psychology,77,683-692.
16. Nicholls, J. G.,R. Ames(Ed.),C. Ames(Ed.)(1984).Conceptions ability and achievement motivation.Research on Motivation in Education: Student motivation,1,39-73.
17. Prapavessis, H.,Grove, J. R.(1998).Self-handicapping and self-esteem.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology,10,175-184.
18. Rhodewalt, F.,R. L. Higgins,D. R. Snyder,S. Berglas(1990).Self-handicapping: the paradox that isn't.New York:Plenum.
19. Rhodewalt, F.,Saltzman, A. T.,Wittmer, J.(1984).Self-handicapping among competitive athletes: the role of practice in self-esteem protection.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,5,197-209.
20. Ryska, T. A.,Yin, Z.,Boyd, M.(1999).The role of dispositional goal orientation and team climate on situational self-handicapping among young athletes.Journal of Sport Behavior,22,410-425.
21. Seifriz, J, J.,Duda, J. L.,Chi, L.(1992).The relationship of perceived motivational climate to intrinsic motivation and beliefs about success in basketball.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,14,375-391.
22. Tice, D. M.(1991).Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60,711-725.
23. Walling, M. D.,Duda, J. L,Chi, L.(1993).The perceived motivational climate in sport questionnaire: Construct and predictive ability.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,15,172-183.
24. Weiner, B.(1979).A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences.Journal of Educational Psychology,71,3-25.
25. 李明堂(1989)。歸因的測量。測驗與輔導，94，1855-1858。
26. 季力康(1994)。運動目標取向量表的建構效度－驗證性因素分析的應用。體育學報，18，299-308。
27. 林宜螢(2002)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
28. 張春興(1995)。張氏心理學辭典。台北市:東華。
29. 莊耀嘉(1980)。台北市，國立台灣大學。
30. 郭爲藩(1975)。自我心理學。台北市:開山書局。
31. 陳偉瑀(2001)。桃園縣，國立體育學院。
32. 盧俊宏(1994)。運動心理學。台北市:師大書苑。