不同教學法介入對於高爾夫初學者擊球桿頭速度之影響

The Effects of Different Teaching Intervention on the Hitting Club Head Speed for Golf Beginner

10.6569/NTUJPE.201003_(17).0005

楊文添(Wen-Tien Yang)；王宏正(Hung-Cheng Wang)

不同教學法 ； 介入方法 ； 高爾夫 ； 擊球 ； 桿頭速度 ； different teaching ； intervention ； golf ； hitting ； club head speed

臺大體育學報

17輯（2010 / 03 / 01）

79 - 91

繁體中文

Purpose: to explore the difference of instantaneous speed of the golf hitting club head before and after three different interventions (baseball pitching, tennis swinging, and traditional golf hitting) for the golf beginners. Method: A total of 57 subjects participated in the study, the subjects were assigned randomly as baseball pitching practice group (N=18), tennis swinging practice group (N=21), and traditional golf training group (N=18). Paired t test was used to examine the significant difference of the club head instantaneous speed in the groups before and after the intervention. One-way ANOVA was used to assess the difference of the club head instantaneous speed among the groups. The significance level was set as α=.05. Results: After 8 weeks different training approaches, the results showed the club head speed increased 4.24±8.72 mph in tennis swing training (p＜.05), 5.54±8.63 mph in traditional golf training (p＜.05), and 4.57±8.00 mph in baseball pitching training (p＜.05). No differences of the club head speed were found among the groups. Conclusion: Because of the trunk rotation training by these three interventions, the results showed that all the club head speeds were improved after these training. Therefore, the interventions (tennis swing, golf training, and baseball pitching) in this study were effective approaches for the golf beginner to increase the club head speed.

Purpose: to explore the difference of instantaneous speed of the golf hitting club head before and after three different interventions (baseball pitching, tennis swinging, and traditional golf hitting) for the golf beginners. Method: A total of 57 subjects participated in the study, the subjects were assigned randomly as baseball pitching practice group (N=18), tennis swinging practice group (N=21), and traditional golf training group (N=18). Paired t test was used to examine the significant difference of the club head instantaneous speed in the groups before and after the intervention. One-way ANOVA was used to assess the difference of the club head instantaneous speed among the groups. The significance level was set as α=.05. Results: After 8 weeks different training approaches, the results showed the club head speed increased 4.24±8.72 mph in tennis swing training (p＜.05), 5.54±8.63 mph in traditional golf training (p＜.05), and 4.57±8.00 mph in baseball pitching training (p＜.05). No differences of the club head speed were found among the groups. Conclusion: Because of the trunk rotation training by these three interventions, the results showed that all the club head speeds were improved after these training. Therefore, the interventions (tennis swing, golf training, and baseball pitching) in this study were effective approaches for the golf beginner to increase the club head speed.

1. 溫麗香、林玉瓊(2003)。合作學習教學在學校舞蹈教學上的應用。大專體育，69，21-26。
   連結：
2. Rushall, B. S.,Ford, D.(1982).Teaching backwards-An alternate skill instruction progression.CAHPERD Journal,48(5),16-20.
3. 王儀旭(2004)。臺北市，臺北市立體育學院。
4. 江連忠(2004)。頂級教練教你打高爾夫。臺北市:靈活文化。
5. 李雨農、張家昌、黃谷臣(2000)。不同教學法運用於高爾夫球初學者擊球表現之分析研究。淡江體育，特刊，69-81。
6. 林郁捷(2005)。臺北縣，輔仁大學。
7. 柯冠銘(2008)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
8. 張家昌、林素婷(2000)。兩種分段教學法對羽球初學者正手發高遠球學習效果之比較研究。淡江體育，11，88-98。
9. 郭展能(2003)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
10. 楊建隆(1998)。台灣地區大四學生選修體育課考量因素之研究。大專體育，35，81-89。
11. 楊紀瑜、徐志祥(2003)。體育選項樂趣化教學與訓練教學之比較研究－以籃球、排球項目為例。台灣運動教育學會學術研討會論文集，桃園縣:
12. 藤田寬之(2006)。好球出擊：球道木桿「新打法」。臺北縣:悅智文化館。
13. 顧毓群(1980)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。

1. 楊正群(2017)。網球擊球與截擊教學先後順序對技能學習表現之影響。海峽兩岸體育研究學報，11(1)，13-31。