秦陵高級軍吏俑手部拄劍狀說法疑慮探討

Clarification on the Meaning of a Gesture Made by the General Figures of the Terracotta Army

10.6569/NTUJPE.201009_(18).0002

游添燈(Tien-Deng Yu)；陳燕欣(Yen-Hsin Chen)

兵馬俑 ； 將軍俑 ； 秦陵 ； 拄劍 ； 姿勢 ； Terracotta Army ； General Figures ； Qin Shihuang Mausoleum ； Sword Pressing ； Posture

臺大體育學報

18輯（2010 / 09 / 01）

15 - 28

繁體中文

本文針對秦陵兵馬俑中六座高級軍吏俑雙手交疊於小腹前的姿勢進行探討，並對既往文獻多採用之「拄劍狀」說法，加以思考與釐清。文中援引現有考古報告為體材，以秦陵出土銅劍及秦俑資料為佐證，經由：一、劍長與陶俑身高比例。二、側面姿勢的疑點。三、御官俑身長與劍長比例之論述途徑，驗證「拄劍說」的合理性，經比對及推論後，證實歷來文獻之「拄劍狀」說法並不符實，故秦陵高級軍吏俑之「雙手拄劍說」的構述與本研究結果不符，應為一錯誤的說法。

This article aims to clarify the meaning of the gesture of six general figures of the Terracotta Army who take a similar posture in which the palms overlap in front of the abdomens. Most former studies tend to express this pose as ”pressing a sword;” however, several evidences imply its inaccuracy. Therefore this article focuses on this issue, attempting to redefine the contention of ”pressing a sword.” By means of the excavation materials of Qin Shihuang Mausoleum, especially the unearthed copper swords and the Terracotta figures, three points can be mapped out to refute the former opinion: the first bases on the length of the copper swords and the heights of the pottery figures; the second bases on the lateral view of the general figures; the third bases on the unearthed charioteer figure and the sword worn at his waist. Throughout such process of clarification, the statement of ”pressing a sword” is proved to be a mistaken interpretation.

1. 王學理(1994)。秦俑專題研究。西安:三秦出版社。
2. 李林娜(2002)。南越藏珍。北京:中華出版社。
3. 岳南(2007)。秦始皇兵馬俑發現記。海口:海南出版社。
4. 秦始皇兵馬俑博物館編(1996)。秦俑學研究。西安:陜西人民教育出版社。
5. 袁仲一(2005)。秦兵馬俑。臺北:瑞昇文化出版社。
6. 袁仲一、張占民(1990)。秦俑研究文集。西安:陜西人民美術出版社。
7. 陝西省考古硏究所始皇陵秦俑坑考古發掘隊(1988)。秦始皇陵兵馬俑坑一號坑發掘報告1974-1984（上）。北京:文物出版社。
8. 陝西省考古硏究所秦始皇兵馬俑博物館(1998)。秦始皇陵銅車馬發掘報告。北京:文物出版社。
9. 趙曄(1996)。吳越春秋。臺北:台灣古籍出版社。