臺灣與澳洲最佳射箭男子團體之對戰紀實與競技模式研析

Analysis on the competition process and athletic models of the two national archery men's teams between Chinese Taipei and Australia

10.6569/NTUJPE.201909_(37).0004

李建興(Chien-Shing Lee)；魏均珩(Chun-Heng Wei)

射箭運動 ； 競賽策略 ； 運動文化 ； Archery ； Competition Strategy ； Sport culture

臺大體育學報

37輯（2019 / 09 / 01）

39 - 47

繁體中文

以賽代訓及運動交流具有競技切磋與文化交流的雙重意涵。本研究透過臺灣男子射箭團體組國家代表隊與澳洲2016年奧運男子團體銅牌組合共同訓練與比賽對抗，研析對戰過程與比較兩國競技模式，做為反思與持續進步的參考。研究方法採行田野研究，透過田野觀察以及教練、選手、行政主管的訪談，參酌相關文獻，進行主題論述。研究結果顯示臺灣與澳洲支國家隊在整體環境、生涯發展、培訓體系、訓練方式、競賽發揮、運科介入等六個不同面向確實有所不同。整體環境上臺灣偏向人為的營造，澳洲崇尚自然的發展；臺灣選手生涯發展趨於競技專業單一走向，澳洲則選手的職涯有較多元的渠道；選手培訓體系方面臺灣以中小學體育班、體育專業大專院國家訓練中心的一貫化培養，澳洲則由民間自行發展後再進行選材。臺灣的訓練方式注重團隊的領導與教練權威的形塑，澳洲偏向個人主義與民主溝通；競賽發揮則因臺灣基礎扎實及選手刻苦耐勞而表現穩定，澳洲選手得利自律自覺而臨場自信十足，各有千秋。運動科學臺灣則明顯可學習科研人員與體能訓練師隨隊觀察，因應選手個別差異及動態變化施與專業建議。整體而言，澳洲著重個人主義與臺灣傾向集體主義而呈現不同運動文化風格。

The strategy of training through competition and sport team visit has the dual meaning of competitive learning and cultural exchange. The purpose of this study is to explore the competition process and athletic Models through the Chinese Taipei men's archery team against Australia's men's team which gained bronze medal 2016 Olympic Games. It is expected that the reflection of the research results can be used as a reference for continuous improvement of Taiwan's national Team. The research method is field research. The data collection approach includes field observation, interviews with coaches, players, and one executive leader, and relevant literature. After the article describes the subtopics, the facts and discussions are mixed. The results of the study show that Taiwan and the Australian national team are indeed different in terms of overall environment, career development, training system, training methods, competition performance, and sports science intervention. In the overall environment, Taiwan is biased towards artificial construction. Australia advocates the development of nature. The career development of Taiwan players tends to be one single trend for competitive professionals. In Australia, the careers of athletes have more diverse channels. In terms of the training system for athletes, Taiwan's primary and high schools' athletic classes, sports training specialized departments in Universities and Taiwan national training center is consistently cultivate the elite athletes. The Australian archery athletes are mainly developed by the private sectors and then selected by the country. Taiwan's training method focuses on the formation of team leadership and coaching authority. Australia prefers individualism and democratic communication. The competition is played well because of Taiwan's solid foundation and hard work attitude. The Australian players have more self-disciplined and self-confident. In the aspect of sport science, Australia has obviously advantage that the scientific research personnel and physical trainers are used to observe in the training and competing fields to give professional advice in response to individual differences and dynamic changes. To sum up, it presents different sports culture styles that Australia focuses on individualism and Taiwan tends to collectivism.

1. 李建興(2009)。臺灣競技運動選手培訓與生涯照顧體制之研究－策略思維觀點。思與言，47(1)，215-249。
   連結：
2. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
3. Bandura, A.(1977).Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review,84(2),191-215.
4. International Olympic Committee (2019). Olympic Games. Retrieved from https:// www.olympic.org/olympic-games
5. World Archery (2016). Results of 2016 RIO Olympic. Retrieved from https:// worldarchery.org/competition/14870/rio2016-olympic-games#
6. 中央通訊社 (2018)。亞運中華英雄榜射箭男團湯智鈞魏均珩羅偉旻。 取自https://www.cna.com.tw/news/gpho/201808270002.aspx
7. 王昭正,朱瑞淵,Jorgensen, D.(1999).參與觀察法.臺北市:弘智.
8. 古博文(2009)。體育校院系所在區域運動人才培訓體系的角色。學校體育，19(6)，42-44。
9. 江文瑞(2007)。臺東，國立臺東大學。
10. 李天任,陳景星(2006)。,臺北市:行政院體育委員會。
11. 李濤名(2013)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學。
12. 邱炳坤（譯）,Merrian, S.,Tisdell, E.(2018).質性研究：設計與施作指南.臺北市:五南.
13. 陶以哲,李建興(2014)。澳洲國家競技運動發展策略之研究。國北教大體育，9，3-14。
14. 彭臺臨(2011).運動,是我對生命的承諾－奧運金牌推手.臺北:博思智庫.
15. 詹健全 (2019)。世界射箭錦標賽奪 1 銀 2 銅魏均珩先盛後衰屈居銀牌，蘋果日報。取自 https ： //tw.appledaily.com/new/ realtime/20171023/1227375/
16. 潘淑滿(2003).質性研究：理論與應用.臺北:心理.
17. 賴文福（譯）,Kutsche, P.(2003).田野民族誌：人類學指導手冊.臺北市:華泰文化.
18. 錢林慧君,陳進利(2010)。,臺北市:監察院。
19. 謝福財(2014)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學。