從《史記．張釋之馮唐列傳》論史遷理想的君臣之道

To unravel Sima's ideal form of emperor-minister relationship through the in-depth study of ＂The Biographic Sketch of Shi-Zhi Chang and Tan Feng＂ in ＂The Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji)＂

朱孟庭(Chu, Meng-Ting)

《史記》 ； 司馬遷 ； 張釋之 ； 馮唐 ； 君臣之道 ； The Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji) ； Qian Sima ； Shi-Zhi Chang ； Tan Feng ； Principle of emperor-minster relationship

興大中文學報

47期（2020 / 06 / 01）

1 - 42

繁體中文

史遷於〈張釋之馮唐列傳〉中寄託了理想的君臣之道，本文從張釋之諫文帝，馮唐諫文帝，剖析其中君明臣良，以理相待之況；同時，透過正、反、正的反覆辯證，先析論張、馮與同僚、賢者為善的自礪之道，再與酷吏相對照，與循吏相類比，最後再參酌史遷於本傳贊文中的論說，得知〈張馮傳〉一方面讚揚漢文帝為「明君」，明理寬厚，勇於納諫，善用賢人等；一方面更著力於褒揚張、馮為「良臣」，以理諫諍，秉公執法，不曲從上意，兼顧法理情，且能掌握言說的態度、分寸、技巧等等，與酷吏迥然不同，亦可謂「循吏」也。如此，明君與良臣，「以理相待」，相輔相成，交織出如尋常百姓家父子、朋友的理想關係，少了絕對的尊卑對待，多了平易的傾聽、瞭解、忍讓、體貼與知心，其中富含諸多的君臣之道，融合儒家與道家（黃老）思想，並吸收其他學派的精華，從而體現他獨具特色、兼容並蓄的君臣之道。

In the artile of ＂The Biographic Sketch of Shi-Zhi Chang and Tan Feng＂, a chapter in ＂The Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji)＂, Grand Historian Sima Qian described an ideal form of emperor-minister relationship. With this theme as a basis, the current study has investigated how Shi-Zhi Chang and Tan Feng admonished the Emperor of Wen of Han Dynasty in order to depict the due respect between enlightened emperor and virtuous minister. Through vigorous arguments back and forth, this works demonstrated that Chang and Feng interacted with sages to leverage their spirituality, subsequently depicting the compassionate manner of them in a clear contrast to the brutality conducted by other officials with a cruel mind. In parallel, the generosity of the two was indicated by an analogical comparison with the humanity of well-reputed officials in the history. The careful examination of Sima's personal note further suggested that the Biographic Sketch not only evaluated the Emperor of Wen as an enlightened leader who was rational, open-minded, well-tempered and wise enough to empower the trustable officials, but also praised Chang and Fang without reservation. Sima considered the two being virtuous ministers because of the following reasons: admonishing the emperor with reasonable endeavor, serving the country with patriotism, executing the law with justice but never flattering the emperor, making decisions with legitimacy and compassion. Sima also pointed out that Chang and Fang always behaved properly and communicated skillfully, thus being characterized as politicians with benevolence but far from officials with brutality. As the consequence, the emperor and the ministers were mutually helping each other while establishing the political entity. Such an unusual bond, which looked more like within family members or friends rather than ordered by absolute hierarchy, was evidenced by listening, understanding, courtesy, considering and wholehearted willingness between two sides. The multiple angles of emperor-minister relationship unraveled in this article was in turn derived from the blend of Confucianism and Taoism. Further combined with essence of other disciplines of Chinese culture, Sima provided his unique yet intriguing view on the inspiring principle of emperor-minster relationship.

1. 洪錦淳(2005)。漢文帝「遺詔」透顯的視域。中國學術年刊，27，1-22。
   連結：
2. 十三經注疏.臺中:藍燈文化事業公司.
3. (1986).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
4. (1986).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
5. (1986).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
6. (1986).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
7. (2010).史記考證文獻彙編.成都:巴蜀書社.
8. (2012).全宋筆記.鄭州:大象出版社.
9. (2005).史記研究集成.北京:華文出版社.
10. (2010).二十四史研究資料彙編．史記.成都:巴蜀書社.
11. (1986).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
12. (1986).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
13. （西漢）司馬遷,王利器（譯注）,張烈（譯注）(2003).史記.臺北:臺灣古籍出版公司.
14. （明）凌稚隆（編）,（明）李光縉（增補）,有井範平（補標本）(1992).補標史記評林.臺北:地球出版社.
15. （明）羅貫中(1986).三國演義.北京:北京大學出版社.
16. （東漢）班固,（清）王先謙（補注）(2008).漢書補注.上海:上海古籍出版社.
17. （東漢）班固,（清）陳立（疏證）(1994).白虎通疏證.北京:中華書局.
18. （南宋）陳亮(1985).龍川文集.臺北:新文豐出版公司.
19. （春秋）孫武(1978).孫子兵法.上海:上海古籍出版社.
20. （清）吳見思(1987).史記論文.臺北:臺灣中華書局.
21. （清）姚祖恩(1988).史記菁華錄.上海:上海古籍出版社.
22. （清）孫詒讓,孫川楷（點校）(1987).墨子閒詁.臺北:華正書局.
23. （清）湯諧（編纂）,韋愛萍（整理）(2013).史記半解.北京:商務印書館.
24. （清）程餘慶,高益榮（編撰）,趙光永（編撰）,張新科（編撰）(2011).歷代名家評注史記集說.西安:三秦出版社.
25. （戰國）慎到,王斯睿（校正）,黃曙輝（點校）(2010).慎子.上海:華東師範大學出版社.
26. （舊題漢）孔安國,（魏）王肅（注）(1990).孔子家語.上海:上海古籍出版社.
27. 王利器(1996).鹽鐵論校注.北京:中華書局.
28. 田昌五（編）,安作璋（編）(2008).秦漢史.北京:人民出版社.
29. 安作璋,熊鐵基(2007).秦漢官制史稿.濟南:齊魯書社.
30. 余英時(2003).士與中國文化.上海:上海人民出版社.
31. 吳平（選編）,周保明（選編）(2014).史記研究文獻輯刊.北京:國家圖書館出版社.
32. 李偉泰(2008)。《史記．循吏列傳》的批判藝術。司馬遷與史記論集，西安:
33. 李景星(1986).四史評議.長沙:岳麓書社.
34. 李滌生(1979).荀子集釋.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
35. 汪高鑫(2013)。漢代社會與史學思想。史學史研究，2013(1)
36. 周富美(1989)。論墨子節葬說。臺大中文學報，3，133-162。
37. 屈萬里(1983).尚書集釋.臺北:聯經出版事業公司.
38. 林礽乾(1998)。《史記．張釋之傳》「縣人」新詮。國文學報，27，101-118。
39. 范祥雍（箋證）,范邦瑾（協校）(2006).戰國策箋證.上海:上海古籍出版社.
40. 國家文物局古文獻研究室（編）(1980).馬王堆漢墓帛書〔壹〕.北京:文物出版社.
41. 張大可(2014)。論漢文帝對時局的把握與政治改革。渭南師範學院學報，29(22)，5-9+13。
42. 張大可（注釋）(2000).史記新注.北京:華文出版社.
43. 張大可（編）(2008).史記論叢.蘭州:甘肅人民出版社.
44. 張舜微(1983).周秦道論發微.臺北:木鐸出版社.
45. 張覺(2006).韓非子校注.長沙:岳麓書社.
46. 許富宏(2008).鬼谷子集校集釋.北京:中華書局.
47. 陳其泰(1990)。『過秦』和『宣漢』──對史學社會功能思考之一。史學史研究，1990(2)
48. 陳麗桂(2013).漢代道家思想.臺北:五南圖書出版公司.
49. 鈕國平(1998).司馬法箋證附韵讀.蘭州:甘肅人民出版社.
50. 蔡茂,周曉莉(2019)。從《貞觀政要》看下屬諫言時機的把握。領導科學，2019(1)
51. 錢鍾書(1979).管錐編.北京:中華書局.
52. 閻應清(1981).漢文帝.北京:中華書局.
53. 韓兆琦(2004).史記箋證.南昌:江西人民出版社.
54. 瀧川龜太郎(2013).史記會注考證.臺北:大安出版社.