自願頂客家庭之探索性研究

The Exploratory Research on the Voluntary DINKs Family

10.6472/JFEC.200812.0081

黃麗萍(Li-Ping Huang)

頂客家庭 ； 無子女家庭 ； 自願無子女 ； DINKs ； Childless Family ； Voluntary Childless

家庭教育與諮商學刊

5期（2008 / 12 / 01）

81 - 105

繁體中文

雖然頂客家庭已存在數十年，但直到最近受到主流社會重視，研究者以自己的經驗出發去探索其教育價值。目前，有關於自願頂客家庭方面的研究仍相當少見，尤其有關自願頂客家庭的相關研究仍屬未知和未探索的領域，應加以闡明，本研究嘗試去補足先前的研究文獻。 本研究目的有三：1.瞭解自願頂客家庭的生活型態；2.探索自願頂客家庭的內心世界；3.檢視自願頂客家庭對社會的覺知。爲達成這些目標，本文將以如下的結構呈現。以質性研究中紮根理論爲研究取向，透過深度訪談爲主要的蒐集資料方式，訪談10位自願頂客家庭。研究結果如下：1.婚前已決定不生育子女；2.妻子是重要關鍵人物；3.歡喜心接受身體的缺陷；4.自我主導的生活型態；5.不生小孩的主觀意念；6.對領養小孩觀念開放；7.全新的生育、婚姻、家庭觀；8.對無子女婚姻感到滿意；9.樂觀面對死亡；10.消極回應親友的關懷。基於以上研究結果，本研究提出對建議，作爲相關人員參考。

Although the voluntary DINKs family has exited for few decades, only recently has its surge of mainstream popularity motivated author to explore its educational value through the lived experiences. There is no general consensus on what the essential knowledge base of the voluntary DINKs family consists of. At present, research focusing on the voluntary DINKs family is still very scarce. Above all, light could be shed on the research field of the voluntary DINKs family which is still largely unknown and uninvestigated. The study author present in the present paper is an attempt to supplement the literature of these earlier studies. This research has three purposes: 1) to understand the lived experiences of the voluntary DINKs family; 2) to explore spiritual world of the voluntary DINKs family; 3) to shed some light on how people view the voluntary DINKs family; For these purposes to be achieved , the article is structured as follows. To attain data, this study adopted qualitative methodology, mainly using qualitatively deep interviews to the collection of data on 10 volunteers of the DINKs family. Analyzed with grounded theory, the research presents the following findings: 1) Making decision don’t bear sons and daughters before marriage; 2) The wife is an key women; 3) Sterility seen bad, but the voluntary DINKs family love in hope; 4) Living is self-directed; 5) Subjective thinking about fertility of the voluntary DINKs family; 6) The adoptive concept is opened with a highly acceptance; 7) Get rid of the maze to traditional values; 8) The marital satisfaction of the voluntary DINKs family are good; 9) The voluntary DINKs family have a positive attitude to death; 10) The voluntary DINKs family are silence on concern of family members and friends. Finally, conclusions are presented and suggestions are made for further research.

1. Barnett, R. C.,Baruch, G. K.(1978).Women in the middle years: A critique of research and theory.Psychology of Women Quarterly,3(2),187-197.
2. Bartholomew, K.,Horowitz, L. M.(1991).Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category mode.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61(2),226-244.
3. Chodorow, N.(1978).The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender.Berkeley:University of California Press.
4. Dewey, J.(1938).Experience and education.New York:Touchstone.
5. Erikson, E. H.(1963).Children and society.New York:Newton.
6. Erikson, E. H.(1982).The life cycle completed.New York:Newton.
7. Fischer, J. L.(1981).Transitions in relationship style from dotecence to young adulthood.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,10,11-23.
8. Flannery, D. D.,E. Hayes,D. D. Flannery(2000).Women as learners: The significance of gender in adult learning.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
9. Gilligan, C.(1982).In a different voice: Psychological therapy and women's development.Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
10. Gould, R. L.(1975).Adult life stages: Growth toward self-tolerance.Psychology Today,8,74-78.
11. Hazan, C.,Shaver, P.(1987).Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(3),511-524.
12. Hook, Gerstein & Gridley(2003).How close are you? Measureing intimacy and Examining gender difference.Journal of counseling and Development,81,462-472.
13. Jarvis, P.(1987).Meaningful and meaningless experience: Towards an analysis of learning from life.Adult Education Quarterly,37,164-172.
14. Kolb, D. A.(1984).Experiential learning.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
15. Levinson, D. J.,C. N. Alexander(Eds.),E. J. Langer(Eds.)(1990).Higher stages of human development.New York:Oxford University Press.
16. Lindeman, E. C.(1926).The meaning of adult education.New York:Harvest House.
17. Maccoby, E. E.(1990).Gender and relayionships: Adevelopmental account.American Psychologist,45,513-520.
18. Marcia, J. E.(1979).Address given at a symposium on identity development.Netherlands:Rijksuniversitat Groningen.
19. Miller, J. B.(1986).Towards a new psychology of women.Boston:Beacon Press.
20. Newman, P.、Newman, B.、敦靜晃譯、吳幸玲譯(1994)。發展心理學：心理社會理與實務。台北:揚智。
21. Papalia, D. E.、Olds, S. W.、黃慧真譯(1992)。成人發展。台北:桂冠。
22. Parks, M. R.,Floyd, K.(1996).Meaningsfor Closeness and Intimacy in Friendship.Journal of Social & Personal Relationship,13,85-107.
23. Reiss, I. L.(1980).Family systems in Americ.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
24. Reiss, I. L.,Helena Lopata (Ed.)(1980).Research on the Interweave of Social Roles: Women and Men.Greenwich, Connecticut:JAI Press.
25. Ryff, C. D.,Migdal, S.(1984).Intimacy and generativity: Self-perceived trasitions.Signs,9,470-481.
26. Schaefer, M. T.,Olson, D. H.(1981).Assessing Intimacy: The Pair Inventory.Journal of Marital & Family Therapy,7,47-60.
27. Schlossberg, N. K.(1984).Counseling adults in transition: Linking practice with theory.New York:Springer Pub. Co..
28. Stemberg, R, J.(1986).A triangular theory of love.Psychological Review,93,119-135.
29. Vaillant, G.(1977).Adaptation to life.Boston:Little Brown.
30. Webster, J. D.(1997).Attachment Style and Psychological Well-Being in Elderly Adult: A Preliminary Investigation.Canadian Journal on Aging,16,101-111.
31. Wrightsman, L. S.(1994).Adult personality development: Theories and concepts.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
32. 利翠珊(2000)。婚姻親密情感的內涵與測量。中華心理衛生學刊，12，29-51。
33. 吳玉鈴(2001)。女性主義認識論與婦女學習。社會教育學刊，30，3-24。
34. 吳淡如(1997)。成長是唯一的希望。台北:大田。
35. 杜仲傑(1990)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
36. 林芝安(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
37. 林惠卿(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北縣，私立輔仁大學應用心理研究所。
38. 高淑清、國立中正大學教育學研究所編(2000)。質的研究方法。高雄:麗文。
39. 張令恬(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
40. 張德永(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所。
41. 莊瑞飛(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
42. 陳皎眉(1999)。婚姻中的兩性關係。兩性平等教育季刊，6，17-23。
43. 陳雪雲(2000)。經驗、自我與學習。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系社會教育學刊，29，57-92。
44. 陳燕錚(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學心理學系。
45. 曾寶塋(2004)。圖解心理學。台北:易博士。
46. 黃秀菁(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北縣，私立輔仁大學應用心理研究所。
47. 黃富順(2001)。成人的經驗學習。成人教育，59，2-11。
48. 楊茜如(2000)。國立台灣彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
49. 劉麗娟(2002)。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版。
50. 蔡明娟(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北縣，私立輔仁大學心理學系。

1. 張菀馨(2015)。反思代間取向家族治療的效度－以頂客家庭為例。諮商與輔導，358，38-41+32。
2. 張正正(2011)。頂客夫妻婚姻生活經驗之詮釋。家庭教育與諮商學刊，11，77-103。