國小輔導人員工作滿意量表之編製與工作滿意之現況調查

Construction of Job Satisfaction Scale for Elementary School Counselors and the Survey of Their Current Job atisfaction

10.6472/JFEC.201212.0081

陳淑慧(Shu-Hui Chen)；陳慶福(Ching-Fu Chen)

工作滿意 ； 國小輔導人員 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； confirmatory factor analysis ； elementary school counselor ； job satisfaction

家庭教育與諮商學刊

13期（2012 / 12 / 01）

81 - 114

繁體中文

The purpose of this study was to develop a tool to evaluate a job satisfaction of elementary school counselors and to investigate their current job satisfaction. A pretest was given to 170 elementary school counselors from nine counties and cities of middle and southern Taiwan and the posttest was 306 counselors in the same area. By means of parallel analysis, items with lower factor endurance were deleted and the test remained 8 items of ”counseling environment appropriateness”, 7 items of ”the cooperation of school systems”, and 5 items of ”sense of counseling professional competence” factors. Through principal components analysis, the scale explained the factor-structured variance of 70.29%. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the internal consistency was .93. The α coefficients of three subscales were .95, .92, and .84, which showed great validity of the scale. The stability coefficient of the scale's pretest and post test (separated for 3 weeks) (N = 51) was .82 (p ＜ .01). By taking convergent validity test (N = 75), the scale appeared highly related to the job satisfaction scale for elementary school teachers (r = .89, p ＜ .01). The results were as follows: 1. The overall degree of job satisfaction of the elementary school counselors was above medium. The main concern was ”the facility for counseling a school could offer”; the most satisfying item was ”the respect from school staff when making decisions.” 2. There was significant difference in job satisfaction among the elementary school counselors with different gender, administration position, and the size of the school.

The purpose of this study was to develop a tool to evaluate a job satisfaction of elementary school counselors and to investigate their current job satisfaction. A pretest was given to 170 elementary school counselors from nine counties and cities of middle and southern Taiwan and the posttest was 306 counselors in the same area. By means of parallel analysis, items with lower factor endurance were deleted and the test remained 8 items of ”counseling environment appropriateness”, 7 items of ”the cooperation of school systems”, and 5 items of ”sense of counseling professional competence” factors. Through principal components analysis, the scale explained the factor-structured variance of 70.29%. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the internal consistency was .93. The α coefficients of three subscales were .95, .92, and .84, which showed great validity of the scale. The stability coefficient of the scale's pretest and post test (separated for 3 weeks) (N = 51) was .82 (p ＜ .01). By taking convergent validity test (N = 75), the scale appeared highly related to the job satisfaction scale for elementary school teachers (r = .89, p ＜ .01). The results were as follows: 1. The overall degree of job satisfaction of the elementary school counselors was above medium. The main concern was ”the facility for counseling a school could offer”; the most satisfying item was ”the respect from school staff when making decisions.” 2. There was significant difference in job satisfaction among the elementary school counselors with different gender, administration position, and the size of the school.

1. 王精文、范凱棠(2006)。工作不滿足與持續承諾對員工創造力表現之影響。人力資源管理學報，6(4)，81-98。
   連結：
2. 林家興(2002)。中學輔導教師與專業輔導人員工作內容的時間分析。教育心理學報，33(2)，23-40。
   連結：
3. 劉福鎔、林清文(2008)。高中職輔導教師知覺角色壓力、工作滿意度和專業承諾之關係研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，23，213-248。
   連結：
4. 教育部（2008）。教育部補助直轄市縣（市）政府增置國中小輔導教師實施要點。 臺北：教育部。線上檢索日期：2010 年8 月1 日。網址：http://www.guide.edu.tw/file/08.doc
5. Bane, T. Y.(2006).Blacksburg, Virginia,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
6. DeMato, D. S.(2001).Blacksburg, Virginia,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
7. DeMato, D. S.,Curcio, C. C.(2004).Job satisfaction of elementary school counselors: A new look.Professional School Counseling,7,236-245.
8. Kahn, J. H.(2006).Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications.Counseling psychologist,34,684-718.
9. Kolodinsky, P.,Draves, P.,Schroder, V.,Lindsey, C.,Zlatev, M.(2009).Reported evels of satisfaction and frustration by Arizona school counselors : A desire for greater connections with students in a data-driven era.Professional School Counseling,12,193-199.
10. Ross, R. R.,Altmaier, E. M.,Russell, D. W.(1989).Job stress, social support, and burnout among counseling center staff.Journal of Counseling Psychology,36(4),464-470.
11. Russell, D. W.(2002).In search of underlying dimentions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28,1629-1646.
12. VanVoorhis, R. W.,Levinson, E. M.(2006).Job satisfaction among school psychologists: A meta-analysis.School Psychology Quarterly,21(1),77-90.
13. Violanti, L. M.(2003).University of Nevada.
14. Worrell, T. G.(2004).Blacksburg, Virginia,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
15. Zwick, W. R.,Velicer, W. G.(1986).Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.Psychological Bulletin,99,432-442.
16. 王麗斐、田秀蘭、林幸台、林美珠、王文秀(2005)。台灣小學輔導工作的發展與專業內涵之實施現況。香港中文大學基礎教育學報，14(1)，83-100。
17. 王麗斐、趙曉美(2005)。小學輔導專業發展的困境與出路。教育研究月刊，134，41-53。
18. 吳芝儀(2005)。我國中小學校輔導與諮商工作的現況與挑戰。教育研究月刊，134，23-41。
19. 吳晨妤(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，臺北市立教育大學。
20. 李茂能(2006)。結構方程式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用：Graphics & Basic。臺北:心理。
21. 辛俊德(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中，國立臺中師範學院。
22. 林建煌(2001)。管理學。臺北:智勝。
23. 林美珠(2000)。國小輔導工作實施需要現況與困境之研究。中華輔導學報，8，51-76。
24. 林萬億(2005)。我國學校輔導團隊工作的建制。現代教育論壇，13，62-77。
25. 邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS 中文視窗資料分析範例詳解（第三版）。臺北:五南。
26. 苑承偉(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺東，國立臺東大學。
27. 徐承宗(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學。
28. 張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華。
29. 張麗鳳(2005)。當前學校輔導工作的需求與機制。現代教育論壇，13，57-61。
30. 郭至和(2000)。國小輔導人員的角色與專業訓練。諮商與輔導，173，7-13。
31. 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2009)。多變量分析方法統計軟體運用（第五版）。臺北:五南。
32. 陳秉華(1995)。台灣學校輔導人員的養成教育及未來趨勢。諮商輔導論文集：青少年諮商實務＆中美輔導專業之發展趨勢，高雄:
33. 陳寬裕、王正華(2010)。論文統計分析實務Spss與Amos的運用。臺北:五南。
34. 游肇賢(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學。
35. 黃盈彰(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺東，國立臺東師範學院。
36. 黃運生(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化，國立彰化師範大學。
37. 廖鳳池(1992)。推展小學輔導工作的課題與方向。諮商與輔導，82，43-45。
38. 廖鳳池(2005)。學生輔導法立法與我國中小學校輔導工作的未來展望。現代教育論壇第一屆中小學輔導與諮商學術研討會，嘉義:
39. 劉玉文(2009)。台東縣國幼班教師工作滿意度與教師生涯發展之初探。網路社會學通訊，81，18。
40. 劉焜輝、洪莉竹、周麗玉、賈紅鶯、李玉嬋(2003)。學校輔導工作的多元面貌：專業理念與實務的對話。臺北:天馬。
41. 潘安堂(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南投，國立暨南國際大學。
42. 鄭玉疊(2000)。小學輔導工作的問題及其改進途徑。諮商與輔導，173，2-6。
43. 鄭安伶(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東，國立屏東教育學院。
44. 鄭熙彥(1980)。我國高級中等學校輔導教師工作滿意之調查研究。教育學院輔導學報，5，159-194。
45. 鄧崇英(1995)。學校輔導工作何以無法落實。諮商與輔導，114，40-43。
46. 蕭文(1995)。當今台灣輔導工作現況及發展趨勢。諮商輔導論文集：青少年諮商實務＆中美輔導專業之發展趨勢，高雄:

1. 彭秀玲、陳婉真、洪雅鳳、邱郁涵、江守峻(2018)。輔導教師與心理師的跨專業合作量表之編製研究：輔導教師的觀點。測驗學刊，65(4)，341-365。