题名

志工認真性休閒涉入、阻礙、效益與承諾影響關係之研究-以福智教育園區爲例

并列篇名

The Impact of Involvement, Constraints, Benefits and Commitment on Career Volunteers' Serious Leisure: A Study Case of Bliss and Wisdom Educational Park

DOI

10.29423/JSRR.200709_2(1).0002

作者

沈進成(Ching-Cheng Shen);趙家民(Chia-Min Chao);張義立(Yi-Li Chaung);曾慈慧(Tzu-Hui Tseng)

关键词

志工 ; 認真休閒 ; 涉入 ; 阻礙 ; 效益 ; 承諾 ; career volunteer ; serious leisure ; involvement ; constraints ; benefits ; commitment

期刊名称

運動與遊憩研究

卷期/出版年月

2卷1期(2007 / 09 / 01)

页次

19 - 43

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究以「福智教育園區」志工爲實證分析對象,主要目的在探討志工認真休閒涉入、阻礙、效益與承諾之影響關係。特敦請「福智教育園區」之資深志工協助問卷調查,共得有效樣本219份。在分析方法上,首先用次數分配、百分比、平均數對樣本做簡單的描述分析,再採用「信度分析」檢定適合度,進而透過「因素分析」萃取出主要構面,最後以LISREL(線性結構關係模式)來進行分析變數間之影響關係。研究結果發現:1.志工認真休閒涉入認知以生活價值爲最高;志工認真休閒阻礙認知以人際間阻礙爲最高;志工認真休閒效益以宗教福慧效益爲最高;志工認真休閒承諾以情感依附爲最高。2.涉入的三個評量指標「生活價值」、「重要性」、「生活中心」有顯著的正向影響涉入之達成;阻礙的三個評量指標「個人本身阻礙」、「人際間阻礙」、「結構性阻礙」有顯著的正向影響阻礙之達成;效益的四個評量指標「宗教福慧效益」、「生理效益」、「社交效能」、「潛能激發」有顯著的正向影響效益之達成;承諾的二個評量指標「情感依附」、「行爲一致」有顯著的正向影響承諾之達成。3.涉入對阻礙有顯著的反向影響;涉入對效益有顯著的正向影響;阻礙對效益有顯著的反向影響;效益對承諾有顯著的正向影響;阻礙對承諾有顯著的反向影響;涉入對承諾有顯著的正向影響。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of involvement, constraints, benefits and commitment on career volunteers' engagement in serious leisure. The questionnaire was adopted as the research instrument and administered in Bliss and Wisdom Educational Park. 219 copies were collected as major data. The data were analyzed in One-Way ANOVA, Scheffe, and LISREL to investigate the logic relationship between the variables. The major findings of this study are summarized as the following. 1. Life value is the most important concern which influences career volunteers' involvement in serious leisure. Interpersonal relationship is the most frequently mentioned constraint for career volunteers' serious leisure. Religion is ranked the highest as career volunteer's belief in serious leisure. Emotional indulgence is the foremost commitment of career volunteers to serious leisure. 2. Involvement has negative influence on constraints. Involvement positively affects benefits. Constraints produce negative influence upon beliefs. Benefits lead to positive influence upon commitments. Constraints have negative influence upon commitments. Involvement generates positive influence upon commitments. 3. Life value, degree of importance, and core life are three positive indicators of involvement in serious leisure. Three most obvious indicators of restricting serious leisure are personal, interpersonal, and structural constraints. Religious blessing, physical health, social opportunity, and development of potential energy are four positive benefits of serious leisure. Emotional indulgence and behavioral accordance positively influence one's commitment to serious leisure.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
社會科學 > 體育學
参考文献
  1. 張孝銘、高俊雄(2001)。休閒需求與休閒阻礙間之相關研究-以彰化市居民爲實證。體育學報,30,143-152。
    連結:
  2. Ajzen, I.,Driver, B. L.(Eds),Brown, P. J. (Eds),Peterson, G. L. (Eds)(1991).Benefits of Leisure.Stage College, PA:Venture.
  3. Bammel, G.,Burrus-Bammel, L. L.(1982).Leisure and Human Behavior.Dubuge, IA:Wm. C. Brown Company.
  4. Becker, H. S.,Carper, J.(1956).The Elements of Identification with an Occupation.American Sociological Review,21,341-348.
  5. Bloch, P. H.(1982).Involvement Beyond the Purchase Process: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Investigations.Advances in Consumer Research,9,413-417.
  6. Bloch, P. H.,Bruce, G. D.(1984).The Leisure Experience and Consumer Products: An Investigation of Underlying Satisfactions.Journal of Leisure Research,16,74-88.
  7. Bobby, G.(1995).The Importance of Leisure Satisfaction.Journal of Leisure Research,12,279-299.
  8. Buchanan, T.(1985).Commitment and Leisure Behavior: A Theoretical Perspective.Leisure Research,7(4),401-420.
  9. Chubb, M.,Chubb, H.(1981).One-third of Our Time?.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  10. Crawford, D.,Godbey, G.(1987).Reconceptualizing Barriers to Family Leisure.Leisure Sciences,9(2),119-127.
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1975).Beyond Boredom and Anxiety.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  12. Unpublished Paper Submitted to The President's Commission on Americans Outdoors
  13. Goff, S. J.,Fick, D. S.,Oppliger, R. A.(1997).The Moderating Effect of Spouse Support on the Relation between Serious Leisure and Spouses' Perceived Leisure-Family Conflict.Journal of Leisure Research,29(1),47-60.
  14. Gunter, B.,Gunter, N.(1980).Leisure Styles: A Conceptual Framework for Modern Leisure.Sociological Quarterly,2,361-374.
  15. Havitz, M. E.,Dimanche, F(1997).Leisure Involvement Revisited: Conceptual of Conundrums and Measure Advances.Journal of Leisure Research,29(3),245-278.
  16. Henderson, K. A.(1991).The Contribution of Feminism to an Understanding of Leisure Constraints.Journal of Leisure Research,23,363-377.
  17. Homans, G.(1974).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  18. Jackson, E. L.(1988).Leisure Constraints: A Survey of Past Research.Leisure Sciences,10(3),203-215.
  19. Jackson, E. L.(1983).Activity-specific Barriers to Recreation Participation.Leisure Sciences,6(1),47-60.
  20. Kim, S. S.,Scott, D.,Crompton, J. L.(1997).An Exploration of the Relationships among Social Psychological Involvement, Behavioral Involvement, Commitment, and Future Intentions in the Context of Birdwatching.Journal of Leisure Research,29,320-341.
  21. Lu, L.,Argyle, M.(1994).Leisure Satisfaction and Happiness as a Function of Leisure Activity.Journal of Medical Sciences,10,89-96.
  22. Mitchell, A. A.(1981).The Dimensions of Advertising Involvement.Advances in Consumer Research,8,25-30.
  23. Mittal, M.(1989).Measuring Purchase-Decision Involvement Profiles.Psychology & Marketing,6(2),147-162.
  24. Moorman, C.,Gerald Z.,Rohit D.(1992).Relationships between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust within and between Organizations.Journal of Marketing Research,29,314-329.
  25. Rothschild, M. L.(1984).Perspectives in Involvement: Current Problem and Future Directions.Advances in Consumer Research,11,216-217.
  26. Ryan, R. L.,Kaplant, R.,Greset, R. E.(2001).Predicting Volunteer Commitment in Environmental Stewardship Programs.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,44(5),629-648.
  27. Selin, S.W.,Howard, D. R.(1988).Ego Involvement and Leisure Behavior: a Conceptual Specification.Journal of Leisure Research,20(3),237-244.
  28. Sheldon, E. M.(1971).Investments and Involvements as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to the Organization.Administrative Science Quarterly,16,143-150.
  29. Stebbins, R. A.(1992).Amateurs, Professionals, and Serious Leisure.Montreal, Quebec:McGill-Queen's University Press.
  30. Stebbins, R. A.(1997).Casual Leisure: A Conceptual Statement.Leisure Studies,16(1),17-25.
  31. Stebbins, R. A.(1993).Social world, Life-style, and Serious leisure: Toward a Mesa structural Analysis.Quebec:McGill-Queen's University Press.
  32. Stebbins, R. A.(1982).Serious Leisure: a Conceptual statement.Pacific Sociological Review,25,251-272.
  33. Stebbins, R.A.(1992).Hobbies as Marginal Leisure: The Case of Barbershop Singers.Society and Leisure,15,375-386.
  34. Stone, R. N.(1984).The Marketing Characteristics of Involvement.Advances in Consumer Research,11,210-215.
  35. Wiley, C. E.,Shaw, S.,Havitz. M. E.(2000).Men and Women's Involvement in Sport: an examination of the gendered aspects of Leisure Involvement.Leisure Science,22,19-31.
  36. Zaichkows, J. L.(1985).Measuring the Involvement Construct.Journal of Consumer Research,12,341-352.
  37. 立法院公報
  38. 歷年社會團體數量統計表
  39. 余玥林(2004)。雲林縣,國立雲林科技大學休閒運動研究所。
  40. 吳芳儀(2005)。台北市,銘傳大學管理研究所。
  41. 吳美慧、吳春勇、吳信賢(1995)。義工制度的理論與實施。臺北:心理出版社股份有限公司。
  42. 林佳蓉(2002)。台灣地區老人休閒參與和休閒阻礙之研究。國立體育學院論叢,12(2),59-76。
  43. 洪凡育(2002)。嘉義縣,大葉大學休閒事業管理學系碩士班。
  44. 洪煌佳(2002)。臺北市,國立台灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所。
  45. 夏淑蓉、謝智謀(2002)。這個世界需要認真休閒。大專體育,16,163-167。
  46. 高俊雄(1995)。休閒利益三因素模式。戶外研究遊憩,8(1),15-281。
  47. 張春居(2003)。臺中縣,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所。
  48. 郭淑菁(2003)。彰化縣,大葉大學休閒事業管理學系。
  49. 陳南錡(2000)。桃園縣,國立體育學院體育研究所。
  50. 黃蒂(1988)。臺中市,東海大學社會工作研究所。
  51. 趙守博、臺灣省政府社會處編印(1986)。志願服務應有的工作重點及推行要領。社政年報
  52. 蘇信如(1985)。臺北市,國立台灣大學社會學研究所。
  53. 蘇信如(1984)。兩性的平等與人力的開發-談現代家庭主婦與志願服務。社區發展季刊,28,83-89。
被引用次数
  1. 包怡芬(2017)。高雄地區科大學生在休閒阻礙、休閒調適與效益模式之實證研究。國立臺灣體育運動大學學報,6(1),77-95。
  2. 蔡明昌、劉庭宇(2011)。從休閒次文化中發現自我認同─以認真休閒初探。大專體育,117,1-7。
  3. 黃于庭(2009)。登山健行者休閒涉入對心理承諾之影響。運動與遊憩研究,3(3),63-79。
  4. 謝琦強、黃文雄、連啟伶、林永森(2016)。解說志工休閒涉入預測分析之跨層次研究。戶外遊憩研究,29(4),37-65。
  5. 鍾政偉,鄭青展(2014).A Study of Relationship Between Motivation, Involved and Leisure Benefits - Using Play Games Addiction as Moderating Variables.Journal Of Data Analysis,9(1),25-56.
  6. 鍾政偉、蕭玉鈴、黃香萍(2011)。大學生參與電玩遊戲休閒效益之研究:以某科技大學為例。運動休閒管理學報,8(2),38-54。
  7. (2012)。自行車騎乘者休閒涉入歷程與認真休閒特質之個案研究。管理實務與理論研究,6(2),69-83。