大專院校教職員工休閒認定與休閒行爲關係之研究－以北部某大學爲例

Relationship between Leisure Identity and Leisure Behavior among University faculties-case Study in a Northern Taiwan University

10.29423/JSRR.200803_2(3).0011

葉聰嬌(Tsung-Chiao Yeh)

休閒認定 ； 休閒行爲 ； leisure identity ； leisure behavior

運動與遊憩研究

2卷3期（2008 / 03 / 01）

150 - 164

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討大專院校教職員工休閒認定與休閒行爲間的關係，以北部某綜合型大學爲研究對象，以分層隨機抽樣抽取不同學院與處室之教職員工，研究參與者共215位女性、183位男性，以問卷調查法共發放500份問卷，回收398份問卷。研究結果顯示不同人口變項（性別、年齡、教育程度、每月平均收入）在不同性別、不同教育程度與不同每月平均收入之教職員工的休閒認定程度達顯著差異，僅年齡變項未達顯著差異；而休閒認定與休閒行爲間達顯著相關，意即休閒認定程度愈高的教職員工，其參與休閒活動的時間和花費的金額也愈多。休閒認定提供一個新觀點來了解休閒行爲，檢驗其關係有助於未來後續相關之研究。

The purpose of this study was aimed at exploring the relationship between leisure identity and leisure behavior of university faculties in one of northern Taiwan universities. A Questionnaire was distributed; participants (N=500) were randomly selected throughout various colleges and administration offices. 398 valid samples were collected including 215 females and 183 males. The findings have revealed significant gender, educational levels and monthly income differences on leisure identity, but the other factor such as age did not show the difference. Consequently, there was a high correlation of leisure identity and leisure behavior. This result has shown that higher leisure identity of faculty members would spend higher amount of money and time in leisure activities. To sum up, this study has provided a new perspective of examining leisure behavior in high education level. Relevant factors will be used for future academic research.

1. 謝沛書(2004)。臺中，國立臺灣體育學院。
   連結：
2. Anderson, D. F.,Cychosz, C. M.(1994).Development of an exercise identity scale.Perceptual and Motor Skills,78,747-751.
3. Berzonsky, M. D.,G. J. Neimever (Eds.),R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.)(1990).Advances in personal construct theory.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
4. Csikszentmihalyi, M.,Larson, R.(1984).Being adolescent.NY:Basic Book.
5. Danish, S. J.(1983).Musing about personal competence: The contributions of sport, health, and fitness.American Journal of Community Psychology,11,221-240.
6. Erikson, E. H.(1968).Identity: Youth and crisis.NY:Norton.
7. Gilligan, C,Ward, J. V.,Taylor, J. M.,Bardige, B.(1988).Mapping the moral domain.Cambridge. MA:Harvard.
8. Kelly, J. R.(1983).Leisure identities and interactions.London:George Allen& Unwin.
9. Kelly, J. R.(1983).Leisure.Needham Heughts. MA:A Simon & Schuster company.
10. Kelly, J. R.,Godbey, G.(1992).The Sociology of Leisure.PA:Venture.
11. Kleiber, D. A.,Kirshnit, C. E.,L. Diamant (Ed.)(1991).Mind-body maturity: The psychology of sports, exercise, and fitness.NY:Hemisphere.
12. Malmisure, M.(1976).Ego development of a sample of college football players.Research Quarterly,47,148-153.
13. Samdahl, D.,Kleiber, D.(1989).Self-awareness and leisure experience.Leisure Sciences,11,1-10.
14. Stryker, S.,Serpe, R.T.,I. William (Eds.),S. Eric (Eds.)(1982).Knowledges, Personality and Social Behavior.New York:Springer-Verlag.
15. 國情統計通報
16. 連婷治(1999)。新竹，國立新竹師範大學。
17. 黃昱、林房儹(2000)。臺灣運動產業之範疇與分類研究。2000年國際體育運動管理研討會論文，臺中:
18. 葉公鼎(2001)。論第一屆運動休閒產業博覽會的價值。運動管理季刊，2，97。

1. 楊孟華、楊孟華(2010)。嘉義縣國小教師休閒活動參與行為、工作生活品質與工作壓力之研究。運動休閒管理學報，7(2)，132-152。
2. (2011)。大學教職員工健康檢查、生活型態、休閒運動參與及自覺健康狀況相關性探討－以某科技大學為例。朝陽商管評論，10(2)，1-18。