英文摘要
|
This study aimed at exploring the correlation between personality traits and recreation preference among elementary school teachers. Through random cluster sampling, elementary school teachers in Chiayi county and city were taken as subjects. 400 copies of questionnaire were issued, of which 387 copies were valid. The data were then analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, single factor ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and so on. The following conclusions are derived based on the results of this study: 1. The most obvious personality trait shown among elementary school teachers is <||>agreeableness<||> and less of <||>neuroticism<||>. 2. Different age groups show the older the age, the higher the <||>conscientiousness<||> and <||>agreeableness<||>. In addition, those teachers prefer recreation like <||>group activities<||> and <||>social activities<||>. 3. Elementary school teachers are not active in participating recreation activities. They prefer <||>audio-visual entertainment<||>, with the least involvement in <||>outdoor activities<||>. As far as activities are concerned, the five most preferred activities among elementary school teachers, in order, are quiet indoor activities, such as reading newspapers and magazines, reading novels and comic books, watching TV and VCD, listening to music, and meditation and rest. The five least popular activities, in order, are: bungee jumping, rock-climbing, skateboarding, going to cyber-caf & eacute; and going to the gym. 4. Female elementary school teachers showed more noticeable personality traits of <||>agreeableness<||> and <||>neuroticism<||> than male, while that of <||>intellect/openness<||> is more apparent on male teachers. <||>Audio-visual entertainment,<||> <||>outdoor activities,<||> <||>group activities,<||> and <||>social activities<||> are preferred recreation activities among elementary school teachers prefer recreation activities like, and male teachers portray a more evident distinction than female teachers. 5. From the correlation between personality traits and recreation preference among elementary school teachers, it is discovered that those who scored higher in <||>extroversion<||> demonstrate higher preference in <||>social activities<||>.
|
参考文献
|
-
張孝銘、高俊雄(2001)。休閒需求與休閒阻礙間之相關研究-以彰化市居民爲實證。體育學報,30,143-152。
連結:
-
Bammel, G.,Burrus-Bammel, L. L.(1996).Leisure and human behavior.Dubuque. IA:William C. Brown.
-
Diane, S.,Jane, S. H.(1996).Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71(4),796-809.
-
Emmons, R. A.,Diener, E.,Larsen, R. J.(1986).Choice of situations and congruence models of interactionism.Personality and Individual Differences,6,693-702.
-
Goldberg, L. R.(1990).An alternative "Description of Personality": The Big Five factor structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,59,1216-1229.
-
Goldberg, L. R.(1992).The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.Psychological Assessment,4,26-42.
-
Goldberg, L. R.(1993).The structure of phenotypic personality traits.American Psychology,48,26-34.
-
Kelly, J. R.(1990).Leisure.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
-
McCrae, R. R.,Costa, P. T.(1990).Personality in adulthood.New York:The Guilford Press.
-
McCrae, R. R.,Costa, P. T.,Yik, M. S. M.,M. H. Bond (Ed.)(1996).The handbook of Chinese psychology.Hong Kong:Oxford University Press.
-
McCrae, R. R.,John, O. P.(1992).An Introduction to the Five–Factor Model and 46. Its Applications.Journal of Personality,60(2),175-215.
-
Yang, K. S.,Bond, M. H.(1990).Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58,1087-1095.
-
朱俶儀(2003)。花蓮,國立東華大學觀光暨遊憩管理研究所。
-
中華民國臺灣地區時間運用調查報告
-
行政院青年輔導委員會(1997)。青少年休閒價值觀之研究青少年休閒價值觀之研究,未出版
-
行政院青年輔導委員會(1995)。青少年休閒價值觀之研究。臺北:行政院青年輔導委員會。
-
何福田(1990)。青少年生活適應與休閒活動規劃之研究。臺北:行政院青年輔導委員會。
-
吳承典(2003)。雲林,國立雲林科技大學休閒運動研究所。
-
李文進、簡伯丞(2002)。飛行員之人格特質與生活適應。航空醫學暨科學期刊,16(1),19-26。
-
李文題(2001)。臺中,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所。
-
李國華(1993)。國民小學教師休閒活動狀況調查研究。臺南師院學報,26,313-332。
-
李勝彰(2003)。彰化,彰化師範大學教育研究所學校行政班。
-
李雯娣(2001)。國小兒童性格特質之研究。國民教育研究,5,105-139。
-
林芝怡(2005)。高雄,國立高雄師範大學教育系研究所。
-
林思妙(1993)。臺北,國立臺灣師範大學教育心理輔導研究所。
-
胡家欣(2000)。高雄,高雄醫學大學行爲科學研究所。
-
高俊雄(1999)。運動員休閒參與、休閒利益與自覺訓練效果之比較研究。戶外遊憩研究,12(3),43-61。
-
張坤鄉(1991)。國中教師休閒活動狀況之調查研究。教育資料文摘,15(1655),129-163。
-
莊耀嘉、李雯娣(2001)。兒童性格結構:五大模型的本土化檢驗。中華心理學刊,43(1),65-82。
-
許志賢(2001)。臺中,國立臺灣體育學院體育研究所。
-
連婷治(1998)。新竹,國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所。
-
郭泰平(2001)。高雄,國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
-
郭騰淵(1991)。高雄,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
-
陳秀瑤(2004)。高雄,樹德科技大學經營管理研究所。
-
陳怡如(2002)。高雄,國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所。
-
陳淑遙(2004)。嘉義,國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所。
-
陳嬿竹(2002)。屏東,國立屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所。
-
游恆山譯、李素卿譯、Zimbardo, P.G.、Gerrig, R. J.著(2000)。心理學。臺北:五南。
-
黃義良(2001)。九年一貫課程下的教師工作壓力與調適策略。國教輔導,41(2),6-9。
-
詹益統(1996)。新竹,國立交通大學管理科學究所。
-
劉焜輝(1984)。國中教師工作壓力狀況調查表。教育資料文摘,14(4),63-115。
-
蔡培村(1992)。教師休閒生活的價值與規劃。教師實習輔導通訊,3,16-24。
-
鄭紹可(2005)。臺北,國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系。
-
鄭順聰(2001)。桃園,國立體育學院體育研究所。
-
鄧建中(2002)。臺中,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理研究所。
-
鄧柑謀(1991)。高雄,國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
-
鍾蔚起、張酒雄、邱祖賢、郭丁熒、羅瑞玉、楊景堯(1992)。青少年對休閒活動看法之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系-教育學刊,11,107-143。
-
韓繼成(2002)。彰化,國立彰化師範大學教育研究所學校行政碩士班。
-
蘇彗君、劉玲君(1995)。青少年之休閒活動狀況調查報告。學生輔導通訊,40,122-125。
|