電腦影像回饋策略在合作學習情境下對國小學童棒球學習成效學習動機與互動行爲之研究

The Effects of Video Feedback Strategies on Achievement Motivation and Interaction for Elementary School Students during Cooperative Learning Condition

10.29423/JSRR.201012_5(2).0007

陳榮章(Rong-Zhang Chen)

回饋 ； 合作學習 ； 學習動機 ； 互動行爲 ； Feedback ； Cooperative Learning ； Learning Motivation ； Interaction

運動與遊憩研究

5卷2期（2010 / 12 / 01）

86 - 99

繁體中文

目的：探討電腦影像回饋策略在合作學習情境下對國小學童棒球學習成效學習動機與互動行爲的影響。本研究採立意取樣以臺南市三所推展樂樂棒球運動之國小共64人爲實驗對象。方法：爲實驗研究法，以獨立樣本t檢定和皮爾森(Pearson)積差相關推論相關性、以逐步回歸等統計探討相互之關係。本研究以隨機分派方式，將受試者分別接受電腦影像回饋組及教師回饋二種不同實驗處理。結果：電腦影像回饋在棒球學習成效上優於教師回饋。在學習動機方面，電腦影像回饋組教學後之整體學習動機皆高於教師回饋組。另外，電腦影像回饋對於學習動機與互動行爲的提升有幫助，但是人際間互動相對比教師回饋少。從電腦影像回饋組後測互動行爲與學習動機之迴歸分析得知，融入電腦影像回饋教學後，學童在心理互動對滿足感預測能力最強。結論：電腦影像回饋教學可有效提高學童之學習成效與學習動機上值得未來加強有效運動教育之參考。

Purpose: To examine the effects of video feedback strategies on achievement learning motivation and interaction for elementary school students during cooperative learning condition. The participants were 64 students, a purpose sampling from three elementary schools which are promoting Tee Ball in Tainan City. Methods: An experimental method with one way t-test design and Pearson relationship. Participants were random assigned into two treatments (Video feedback and teacher feedback). Results: The Video feedback obviously is higher achievement than that of the teacher feedback. In motivational factor, students working group in Video feedback significantly outscored than that of the teacher feedback conditions. Video feedback group promote the better learning motivation and behavior interaction. However, Video feedback group exists a less interpersonal feedback than Teacher feedback. The data from the regression analysis that Video feedback group perform the best satisfaction in the student's mental interaction. Conclusions: The Video feedback with cooperative learning strategies to promote the higher achievement and learning motivation were an effective model for sport pedagogy.

1. 林尚武、卓俊伶、楊梓楣、陳重佑、葉俊良(2009)。自發錯誤估計促進自我控制回饋的動作學習效益。體育學報，42(2)，15-28。
   連結：
2. 林信宏、黃美瑤、石國棟、周建智(2006)。國小學童動作技能表現、運動技能概念與學習動機之關聯。大專體育學刊，8(1)，47-58。
   連結：
3. 洪新來(2007)。獎勵結構與親和力在合作學習成效之研究。體育學報，24，39-52。
   連結：
4. 楊健生、王儀旭、蔡進祥(2008)。不同訊息回饋策略介入對網球初學者動作技能學習成效分析。輔仁大學體育學刊，7，11-30。
   連結：
5. 鄭麗媛(2008)。合作學習與訊息策略運用對韻律體操動作技能學習成效之影響。體育學報，41(3)，69-80。
   連結：
6. 簡桂彬(2009)。不同回饋方式對法式滾球動作表現品質之影響。海峽兩岸體育研究學報，3(2)，11-30。
   連結：
7. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
8. Bangert-Drowns, R. L.,Kulik, C.-L. C.,Kulik, J. A.,Morgan, M.(1991).The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.Review of Educational Research,61,213-238.
9. Bulter, J. I.(ed.),Griffin, L. L.(ed.)(2005).Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research, and practice.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
10. Carrier, C. A.,Sales, G. C.(1987).A taxonomy for the design of computer-based instruction.Educational Technology,27(1),15-17.
11. Dempsey, J.(ed.),Sales, G. C.(ed.)(1993).Instruction and feedback.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
12. Eckrich, J.,Widule, C. J.,Shrader, R. A.,Maver, J.(1994).The effects of video observational training on video and live observational proficiency.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,13,216-227.
13. Gangstead, S. K.,Beveridge, S. K.(1984).The implementation and evaluation of a methodological approach to qualitative sport skill analysis instruction.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,3,60-70.
14. Hooper, S.,Hannafin, M. J.(1988).Cooperative CBI: The effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts.Journal of Educational Computing Research,4(4),413-424.
15. Johassen, D. H.(ed.)(1988).Instructional Designs for Microcomputer Courseware.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Keller, J. M.(1987).Development and use of the ARCS feedback of instructional design.Journal of Instructional Development,10(3),2-10.
17. Kniffen, M. K.(1985).The Ohio State University.
18. Magill, R. A.(2004).Motor learning and control: Concepts and application.New York:McGraw-Hill.
19. Morrison, C.,Reeve, J.,Harrison, J.(1992).The effect of obstruction on the ability to qualitatively analyze and perform movement skills.Canadian Journal of Health Physical Education and Recreation,58(2),18-20.
20. Nicase, V.,Cogerino, G.,Fairclough, S.,Bcois, J.,Davis, K.(2007).Teacher feedback and interactions in physical education: Effects of student gender and physical activities.European Physical Education Review,13(3),319-337.
21. Pinheiro, V. E. D.,Simon, H. A.(1992).An operational feedback for motor skill diagnosis.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,11,288-302.
22. Schmidt, R. A.,Wrisberg, C. A.(2004).Motor learning and performance.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
23. Schunk, D. H.(ed.),Zimmerman, B. J.(ed.)(1998).Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice.N.Y.:The Guilford Press.
24. Siedentop, D.(1991).Developing teaching skills in physical education.Palo Alto, CA:Mayfield.
25. Simsek, A.,Tsai, B.(1992).The impact of cooperative group composition on student performance and attitudes during interactive videodisc instruction.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction,19(3),86-91.
26. Slavin, R. E.(1987).Cooperative learning: where behavioral and humanistic approaches to classroom motivation meet.Elementary School Journal,88(1),29-37.
27. Stadulis, R. E.(ed.)(1977).Research and Practice in Physical Education.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
28. Tzetzis, G.,Votsis, E.,Kourtessis, T.(2008).The effect of different corrective feedback methods on the outcome and self-confidence of young athletes.Journal of Sport Science and Medicine,7,371-378.
29. Weiss, M. R.,Ebbeck, V.,Rose, D. J.(1992)."Show and tell" in the gymnasium revisited: Developmental differences in modeling and verbal rehearsal effects on motor skill learning and performance.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,63,292-301.
30. Weiss, M. R.,Klint, K. A.(1987).Show and tell in the gymnasium: An investigation of investigation of developmental differences in feedback and verbal rehearsal of motor skills.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,58(2),234-241.
31. 中小棒球運動聯賽籌備委員會(2003)。樂樂棒球教學活動參考手冊。臺北:教育部。
32. 王儀旭、周建智、邱仕友(2004)。不同體育教學回饋模式介入對投擲學習成效的影響。復興崗學報，81，273-302。
33. 周建智(2004)。國科會研究計畫案國科會研究計畫案,國科會。
34. 翁樹澍(1990)。嘉義，中國文化大學兒童福利研究所。
35. 黃清雲(1994)。互動式科技與體育教學。國民體育季刊，23(3)，65-74。
36. 黃清雲(1999)。新科技在體育之應用：理論與實際。教學科技與媒體，46，2-12。
37. 黃清雲、何燕娟(2003)。合作學習之訓練結構對九年一貫課程體育教學學習成效與互動行爲之研究。嘉義大學學報，74，39-52。
38. 黃朝嘉(2009)。嘉義，國立嘉義大學體育與健康休閒研究所。
39. 趙明毅(2006)。嘉義，國立嘉義大學體育與健康休閒研究所。
40. 蔡碧鳳、洪明洲(1999)。學習與創作的網路課程設計—以「企業管理」課程爲例。隔空教育論叢，11，1-31。

1. 簡崇霖、陳慶帆(2017)。KP 加影像回饋對於桌球動作技能表現之影響。文化體育學刊 ，25，1-10。
2. 鄭佳敏,楊嘉恩(2021)。影音教學在桌球課程上之應用。中原體育學報，17，61-69。
3. 莊哲偉、林靜萍(2014)。不同回饋方式對桌球發球技能學習成效之影響。臺灣運動教育學報，9(2)，45-64。
4. (2012)。網路合作學習在國內的相關文獻回顧與展望。市北教育學刊，42，75-101。