運動支持性環境量表編製之研究

A study of sports supportive environment scale

10.29423/JSRR.201803_12(3).05

張志銘(Chin-Ming Chang)；吳紫彤(Tzu-Fong Wu)；陳明宏(Ming-Hung Chen)；宋孟遠(Meng-Yuan Sung)

休閒涉入 ； 遊憩體驗 ； 休閒效益 ； Accessibility ； space ； aesthetics

運動與遊憩研究

12卷3期（2018 / 03 / 01）

66 - 78

繁體中文

本研究旨在編製具有良好信、效度及適合台灣居民使用的運動支持性環境量表。本研究以發放網路問卷方式調查桃園市具有規律運動習慣之成年人，有效問卷數量為644份。本研究經探索性因素分析得到運動支持性環境量表的五個構面，包含了可及性、空間性、附屬設施、安全性、美觀性，各構面間之Cronbach's Alpha值介於.816～.900，整體之Cronbach's Alpha值為.951，表示本量表具有良好之信度。再經過1.收斂效度檢驗：研究模型中的測量變數標準化迴歸係數介於.515～.935，而潛在變項的組成信度介於.819～.909，皆.6以上，且平均變異數抽取量介於.565～.717，皆大於.50，表示運動支持性環境量表模型具有良好的收斂效度。2.區別效度檢驗：本量表兩兩構面之共變數與標準誤所形成的信賴區間（共變數±2倍標準誤）不含1，本量表具有良好的區別效度。3.結構模式適配度分析：得到X^2為276.86，X^2與自由度比值2.307，GFI值為.955，AGFI值為.936，RMSEA值為.045，CFI值為.975，PGFI值為.670，結果顯示本模式的適配度良好，顯示運動支持性環境量表是一份良好的量表問卷。

The main purpose of this study is as follows: to prepare a sports supportive environment scale with good reliability and validity for Taiwan residents. This study distributed network questionnaires, surveying the residents of Taoyuan City that have regular exercise habits of adults. The number of valid questionnaires was 644. In this study, five factors of the sports supportive environment scale were obtained by exploratory factor analysis, including accessibility, space, ancillary facilities, safety and aesthetics. The Cronbach's Alpha values were between .816 ~ .900, the overall Cronbach's Alpha value of .951, said the scale has a good reliability. And then passed 1. Convergenct validity test: the measurement variable in the study of the Standardized Regression Weights is between .515 ~ .935, and the composite reliability of the latent variable is between .819 ~ .909, are more than 0.6, and the average variance extracted is between .565 ~ .717, which is greater than .50, indicating that the sports supportive environment scale model has good convergence validity. 2. Discriminant validity test: The resulting confidence interval (covariance ± 2 times the standard error)formed by the covariance between the every two factors of the scale and the standard error does not contain 1, this scale has a good discriminant validity. 3. Structural model fitness analysis:get X^2=276.86, X^2/df=2.307, GFI=.955, AGFI=.936, RMSEA=.045, CFI=.975, PGFI value=.670 , The results show that the mode of good fit. This shows that the sports supportive environment scale is a good scale.

1. 田文政(2003)。夜間使用學校運動場地設施行為模式之研究。體育學報，35，179-191。
   連結：
2. 江彥政、翁珮怡(2012)。多走路多健康: 步行環境與居民健康之關係。戶外遊憩研究，25(4)，25-50。
   連結：
3. 呂惠富(2008)。休閒運動之參與動機與休閒效益關係之研究。休閒產業管理學刊，1(1)，41-53。
   連結：
4. 李城忠、施麗玲(2012)。高齡者運動休閒涉入對身心健康與生活滿意度影響之研究。休閒產業管理學刊，5(1)，21-39。
   連結：
5. 李麗晶、卓俊伶(2008)。身體活動和老人憂鬱症。中華體育季刊，22(2)，60-69。
   連結：
6. 黃淑貞、盧俊吉、洪文綺、邱雅莉(2009)。環境因素和社會支持與都市地區國小學童身體活動之相關研究。健康促進與衛生教育學報，32，107-123。
   連結：
7. 溫啟邦、衛沛文、詹惠婷、詹益辰、江博煌、鄭丁元(2007)。從分析運動熱量談當前台灣全民運動政策─比較臺灣與美國民眾的運動習慣，強度與頻率。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，26(5)，386-399。
   連結：
8. Frumkin, H.(2003).Healthy places: exploring the evidence.American journal of public health,93(9),1451-1456.
9. Giles-Corti, B.,Donovan, R. J.(2002).The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity.Social science & medicine,54(12),1793- 1812.
10. Hatcher, Larry(1994).A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling.Cary, NC:The SAS Institute.
11. Humpel, N.,Owen, N.,Leslie, E.(2002).Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: a review.American journal of preventive medicine,22(3),188-199.
12. Li, F.,Fisher, K. J.,Brownson, R. C.,Bosworth, M.(2005).Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neigh bourhood walking activity in older adults.Journal of epidemiology and community health,59(7),558-564.
13. Sallis, J. F.,Frank, L. D.,Saelens, B. E.,Kraft, M. K.(2004).Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,38(4),249-268.
14. Vojnovic, I.(2006).Building communities to promote physical activity: a multi -scale geographical analysis.Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography,88(1),67-90.
15. WHO(1998).Health promotion glossary.
16. Zacharias, J.(2001).Pedestrian behavior pedestrian behavior and perception in urban walking environments.Journal of Planning Literature,16(1),3-18.
17. 吳明隆(2009)。SPSS 操作與應用：問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南。
18. 林新龍(2007)。休閒運動涉入對國人身心健康之關連性探討。雲科大體育，10，59-65。
19. 胡淑貞(2011)。支持性環境對身體活動的影響。醫療品質雜誌，5(2)，34-37。
20. 陳淑眉、胡淑貞(2006)。社區鄰里環境對健康的影響：文獻回顧。健康城市學刊，31-37。
21. 體育署 （ 2015 ）。運動城市調查。106 年3 月15 日， 資料取自http://www.sa.gov.tw/wSite/public/Attachment/f1465786888448.pdf