桌球課程情境興趣與學習成效之關係研究

The relationships between situational interest and learning performance of table tennis course

10.29423/JSRR.202103_15(3).06

陳春安(Chun-An Chen)

興趣選項 ； 桌球 ； 情境興趣 ； 結構方程模式 ； interest selection ； table tennis ； situational interest ； structural equation modeling

運動與遊憩研究

15卷3期（2021 / 03 / 01）

71 - 84

繁體中文

本研究旨在建立情境興趣與學習成效之關係模式。透過立意抽樣之問卷調查方式，以南部某科技大學體育興趣選項桌球課程的學生為研究對象，分別以量表蒐集學生的情境興趣及學習成效之資料，共計257份有效問卷，並運用驗證性因素分析與結構方程模式進行分析。研究結果發現：情境興趣正向且顯著影響學習成效。本研究經由結構方程模式驗證性分析之後，所提出情境興趣與學習成效之關係模式適用於此研究，南部某科技大學學生桌球課程的情境興趣與學習成效之關係密切，情境興趣可視為桌球學習成效的重要影響因子。因此，建議學校體育教師設計具有新奇、挑戰、專注需求、持續享受、探究意圖等情境的桌球課程，引發學生的情境興趣，以提升學生之桌球學習成效。

The purpose of this study was to construct and examine the nature of relationships between situational interest and learning performance. The study used a questionnaire-based survey, drawing from a purposive sample from table tennis interest selection course students of science and technology university physical education in southern Taiwan. A total of 257 usable structured questionnaires were collected to receive situational interest and learning performance information. Data was analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM). The analytical results showed a good fit to overall model. Situational interest is positively related to learning performance in southern Taiwan science and technology university, and situational interest is the most important element for table tennis learning performance. Therefore, physical education teachers design table tennis courses with novelty, challenge, attention demand, instant enjoyment, exploration intention are recommended to attract students' interest in the situation, so as to enhance students' table tennis learning performance.

1. 洪嘉文(2000)。新世界學校體育願景。國體育季刊，29(1)，26-35。
   連結：
2. 涂馨友,盧俊宏,楊明蓁(2019)。體育課情境興趣量表中文化及信效度檢驗。體育學報，52(3)，389-404。
   連結：
3. Ainley, M.(2006).Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes.Educational Psychology Review,18(4),391-405.
4. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structure equations models.Journal of Academic of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94.
5. Bentler, P. M.,Wu, E. J. C.(1993).EQS/Windows user’s guide.Los Angeles:BMDP Statistical Software.
6. Chen, A.,Darst, P. W.,Pangrazi, R. P.(2001).An examination of situational interest and its sources.British Journal of Educational Psychology,71,383-400.
7. Chen, A.,Wang, Y.(2017).The role of interest in physical education: A review of research evidence.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,36,313-322.
8. Chen, S.,Chen, A.,Zhu. X.(2012).Are K-12 Learners Motivated in Physical Education? A Meta-Analysis.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,83(1),36-48.
9. Ding, H.,Sun, H.,Chen, A.(2013).Impact of expectancy-value and situational interest motivation specificity on physical education outcomes.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,32,253-269.
10. Dohn, N. B.,Madsen, P. T.,Malte, H.(2009).The situational interest of undergraduate students in zoo physiology.Advances in Physiology Education,33(3),196-201.
11. Durik, A. M.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2007).Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest.Journal of Educational Psychology,99,597-610.
12. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.NJ Upper Saddle River:Pearson Education.
13. Harackiewicz, J. M.,Barron, K. E.,Tauer, J. M.,Carter, S. M.,Elliot, A. J.(2000).Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time.Journal of Educational Psychology,92(2),316-330.
14. Hidi, S.,Anderson, V.(1992).Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing.The Role of Interest in Learning and Development,11,215-238.
15. Hidi, S.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2000).Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century.Review of Educational Research,70(2),151-179.
16. Hidi, S.,Renninger, A.(2006).The four phase model of interest development.Educational Psychologist,41,111-127.
17. Jackson, A. L.,Inger, R.,Bearhop, S.,Parnell, A.(2009).Erroneous behavior of MixSIR, a recently published Bayesian mixing model: A discussion of Moore & Semmens (2008).Ecology Letters,12(3),E1-E5.
18. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford Press.
19. Krapp, A.(2002).Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective.Learning and Instruction,12,383-409.
20. Krapp, A.(2005).Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations.Learning and Instruction,15,381-395.
21. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L.,Patall, E. A.,Messersmith, E. E.(2013).Antecedents and consequences of situational interest.British Journal of Educational Psychology,83(4),591-614.
22. Meyer, D. K.,Turner, J. C.(2002).Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research.Educational Psychologist,37,107-114.
23. Palmer, D. H.(2009).Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(2),147-165.
24. Palmer, D.,Dixon, J.,Archer, J.(2017).Using situational interest to enhance individual interest and science-related behaviors.Research in Science Education,47(4),731-753.
25. Renninger, K. A.,Hidi, S.(2016).The power of interest for motivation and engagement.New York, NY:Routledge.
26. Renninger, K. A.,Hidi, S.(2011).Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest.Educational Psychologist,46,168-184.
27. Savickas, M. L.,Spokane, A. R.(1999).Vocational interests: Meaning, measurement, and counseling use.San Jose, CA:Davies Black.
28. Schiefele, U.,Krapp, A.,Winteler, A.(1992).Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research.The role of interest in learning and development,Hillsdale, NJ:
29. Schraw, G.,Lehman, S.(2001).Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research.Educational Psychology Review,13(1),23-52.
30. Shen, B.,Chen, A.,Guan, J.(2007).Using achievement goals and interest to predict learning in physical education.Journal of Experimental Education,75,89-108.
31. Shen, B.,Chen, A.,Tolley, H.,Scrabis, K. A.(2003).Gender and Interest-Based Motivation in Learning Dance.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,22(4),396-409.
32. 陳春安,鍾潤華(2019)。桌球課程學習動機、學習策略與學習成效之關係研究。高科大體育，2，81-95。
33. 陳進祥(2017)。大學生參與桌球課程動機與滿意度模式之實證。休閒與社會研究，15，23-38。
34. 陳銘峰,黃韻靜,蔡宇柔,江界山,黃昶翰(2003)。2003 年國際優秀桌球選手年度訓練計畫模型之探討與規劃。文化體育學刊，1，155-164。
35. 黃芳銘(2007).結構方程模式.臺北市:五南.
36. 鄭瑞洲,洪振方,黃台珠(2011)。情境興趣－制式與非正式課程科學學習的交會點。科學教育月刊，340，2-10。

1. 陳春安(Chun-An Chen);邱榮貞(Jung-Chen Chiu)(2023)。大學體育課情境興趣與學習滿意度之研究－以樂趣化籃球課程設計為例。成大體育學刊。55(1)。1-16。