《東坡易傳》特色舉要

Feature Recapitulations of Dong Po I-Ching Biography

10.29766/JCLLNTU.201209.0001

鄧秀梅(Hsiu-Mei Teng)

東坡易傳 ； 蘇軾 ； 卦合爻別 ； 剛柔交感 ； 和而不同 ； Dong Po I-Ching Biography ； Su Shih ； Unity of divinatory symbols and Division of lines ； Alteration of emotions between strength and weakness ； Like-minded but varied

臺北大學中文學報

12期（2012 / 09 / 01）

1 - 20

繁體中文

蘇軾（字子瞻，號東坡居士，1037-1101）雖是以詞章詩賦聞名古今，然而他對於儒釋道三家思想實頗有研究，所著之《東坡易傳》在易學史上稱得上獨樹一幟。他的某些觀點，頗深得易理之精髓，即使是楊萬里、程伊川等人也稍有不及。綜觀此書，其特色首要在推闡理勢，發明愛惡相攻、情偽相感之意，甚少取益於象數，亦不固滯在卦象「始、壯、究」的形成過程，常有令人驚嘆的奇思異想。其次，本書的易理思維明顯傾向道家思想，道家對於「德性」之見解乃是陰柔中虛優於陽剛堅毅，本書無處不展現此精神；除此，從某些卦爻辭的解繹看來，《東坡易傳》頗能傳達易之「圓而神」的精義，此點確是優於儒者之著《易傳》。是以本文由此觀點契入以探索《東坡易傳》的易理思想。

Although Su Shih (surname as Tzu Chan, dubbed as Dong Po Jiu Shih, A.D1037~1101) is famous for his expertise on classical Chinese poetry in both past and present history, he is rather good at the study on the principles of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism, and his work of Dong Po I-Ching Biography definitely stands out in the chronicles of I-Ching Study. Some of his viewpoints are actually just right to the points on the principles of I-Ching, even for people such as Yang Wan Li and Cheng Yi Chuan, while comparing to him, it is seen as slightly inadequate. By summing up the book, its features are mainly to presume as well as to illustrate logics, with invention on the meaning of comparable attack between love and hate, as well as comparable emotions between affection and cynicism; not only seldom there is anything to relate with the cons of xiang shu (image and number), but there is no stubbornness on the forming process of three lines as ”beginning, growth, and reasoning” in the diagram of divinatory symbols, in fact, oftentimes there are amazing ideas and thoughts that are out of ordinary. Next, the thoughts of I-Ching principles from the book are obviously tilted to the ideas of Taoism, and for Taoists, their opinions on the ”nature of virtue” are actually to see weakness with tenderness as superior over strength with endurance, the spirit of which is presented everywhere in the book; besides this, by looking at some of the explanations made on the languages of lines from divinatory symbols, Dong Po I-Ching Biography is good at delivering the real meanings of ”perfection and divinity”, and for this, it indeed does a better job than the work of I-Ching Biology written by Confucianists. In this way, based upon such viewpoint, this is where the paper makes its exploration into the thoughts of I-Ching principles in Dong Po I-Ching Biography.

1. 陳素英(2006)。《東坡易傳》及其詞中易境之詮釋。彰化師大國文學報，十二
   連結：
2. (1986)。景印文淵閣四庫全書總目。臺北:台灣商務印書館。
3. 宋朱熹(1992)。十四卷本周易本義、易學啟蒙通釋。臺北:廣文書局。
4. 宋程顥、宋程頤(2004)。二程集。北京:中華書局。
5. 宋楊萬里(2008)。誠齋易傳。北京:九州出版社。
6. 宋蘇軾(2002)。東坡易傳。長春:吉林文史出版社。
7. 明王守仁(1978)。王陽明全集。臺北:河洛圖書出版社。
8. 清黃宗羲、清全祖望補修(1986)。宋元學案。北京:中華書局。
9. 朱維煥(2000)。周易經傳象義闡釋。臺北:臺灣學生書局。
10. 朱熹、陳俊民校定(2000)。朱子文集。中央研究院歷史與語言研究所。
11. 余敦康(2006)。漢宋易學解讀。北京:華夏出版社。
12. 吳怡(1991)。易經繫辭傳解義。臺北:三民書局。
13. 金景芳、呂紹綱(1996)。周易全解。臺北:韜略出版有限公司。
14. 楊家駱編(1964)。四明叢書。臺北:中國文化學院出版部。
15. 楊遇青(2006)。「志氣如神」與「以神行智」─論《東坡易傳》中「神」的觀念。周易研究，4
16. 趙清文(2009)。人性「可見」嗎？─《東坡易傳》對傳統人性理論的批評。周易研究，2009(1)

1. 袁承維(2023)。從《東坡易傳》看蘇軾的思維模式和變法觀。政治科學論叢，95，47-82。
2. 袁光儀(2013)。從李贄對蘇軾學術之評價考察其思想之建樹─以《九正易因》對《東坡易傳》之徵引討論為核心。成大中文學報，43，47-86。