《詩經》互文補義與互文見義的辨析

An Argumentative Analysis of the Semantic Differences between the Complementary Mutual Texts and Manifestive Mutual Texts in ＂The Book of Poetry＂

蔡宗陽

《詩經》 ； 互文補義 ； 互文見義 ； The Book of Poetry ； The Complementary Mutual Texts ； The Manifestive Mutual Texts

臺北大學中文學報

17期（2015 / 03 / 01）

1 - 11

繁體中文

鑽研《詩經》，發現《詩經》萎多互文補義與互文見義，既有助於訓話《詩經》，又有助於互文補義與互文見義之辨析。一般易於將互文補義與互文見義混淆，本論文旨在探析二者之異同。

Upon exploring The Book of Poetry, we find that there are plenty of Complementary Mutual Texts and Manifestive Mutual Texts, which are not only conducive to the interpretations of The Book of Poetry, but also conducive to the argumentative analysis of the semantic differences between the Complementary Mutual Texts and the Manifestive Mutual Texts. However, since there have been confusions in meanings between these two mutual texts, it is thus of necessity to distinguish their semantic denotations and connotations from each other, which is the tenet of this article.

1. 朱孟庭(1996)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺灣師大國文研究所。
2. 朱熹(1979)。詩集傳。臺北市:蘭台書局。
3. 余培林(2007)。詩經正詁。臺北市:三民書局。
4. 黃焯(1981)。詩說。長江文藝出版社。
5. 趙克勤(1983)。古漢語修辭簡論。北京:商務印書館。
6. 蔡宗陽(2013)。應用修辭學。臺北市:萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司。
7. 嚴粲(2005)。詩緝。臺北市:廣文書局。