英文摘要
|
The main purpose of this paper is to explore the methods and thoughts expressed in Dai Junren's writing of "Chunqiu bianli" Through the analysis of the literature, it can be found that Dai Junren regards Confucianism as his basic position, and wants to use the theme of "Chun Qiu" to distinguish right from wrong and regard the world as the public. He wanted to get rid of bad traditional explanations, and play "Spring and Autumn" at a modern price. His research results pointed out that the inductive examples did not start with Confucius, and "The Story of Gongyang" was the earliest creation. "Gu Liang Biography" adds commendation and criticism to the explanation; He Xiu explains these inductive methods more completely, but they also give a far-fetched interpretation. On the other hand, scholars studying Zuo Zhuan have also begun to use this method to explain. Dai Junren pointed out many unreasonable aspects of scholars in the Han Dynasty: First, Dai Junren blamed them of violating Confucian principles. Second, their explanation is not in line with worldly wisdom. Third, their explanations are inconsistent. Fourth, their explanation does not conform to history. Fifth, many of their explanations reflect personal prejudices, so these argument cannot be the principles of Confucius' writing methods. The purpose of Dai Junren's discourse is to resolve the misunderstanding of "Chun Qiu", and to advocate the value of its rationale, emphasizing the interpretation of "Chun Qiu" from the perspective of historical analysis. This will help realize the application of classic modernization.
|
参考文献
|
-
張高評(2013)。從屬辭比事論《公羊傳》弒君之書法──《春秋》書法之修辭觀。東華漢學,18,135-188。
連結:
-
(2002).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
-
(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
(2002).續修四庫全書.上海:上海古籍出版社.
-
(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
(1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
王靜芝(1992).經學通論.臺北:國立編譯館.
-
司馬遷(2001).史記.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
-
永瑢,紀昀(1997).四庫全書總目.臺北:藝文印書館.
-
朱彝尊(1965).曝書亭集.臺北:臺灣中華書局.
-
何休(注),賈公彥(疏)(1989).春秋公羊傳注疏.臺北:大化書局.
-
杜預(1980).春秋釋例.臺北:臺灣中華書局.
-
杜預(集解),孔穎達(正義)(1989).春秋左傳注疏.臺北:大化書局.
-
車行健(2011).現代學術視域中的民國經學:以課程、學風與機制為主要觀照點.臺北:萬卷樓圖書出版公司.
-
阮廷瑜(2008).戴君仁靜山先生年譜及學術思想之流變.臺北:國立編繹館.
-
周何,田博元(1979).國學導讀叢編.臺北:康橋出版事業公司.
-
林慶彰(編)(2003).五十年來的經學研究.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
-
柯劭忞(2018).春秋穀梁傳注.桂林:廣西師範大學出版社.
-
胡安國,王麗梅(點校)(2011).春秋傳.長沙:岳麓書社.
-
范甯(集解),楊士勛(疏)(1989).春秋穀梁傳注疏.臺北:大化書局.
-
唐君毅(1994).中國文化之精神價值.臺北:正中書局.
-
徐復觀(2013).儒家政治思想與民主自由人權.臺北:臺灣學生書局.
-
國立臺灣大學中國文學系(2000).戴靜山先生百年誕辰紀念文集.臺北:國立臺灣大學中國文學系.
-
張高評(2004)。臺灣《春秋》經傳研究之師承與論著。江海學刊,2004(4),163-169。
-
郭慶藩(編)(2007).莊子集釋.臺北:萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司.
-
章太炎,馬勇(輯)(2003).章太炎書信集.石家莊:河北人民出版社.
-
章學誠,葉瑛(校注)(2002).文史通義校注;校雔通義校注.臺北:頂淵文化事業有限公司.
-
程發軔(1989).春秋要領.臺北:東大圖書股份有限公司.
-
程發軔(編)(1972).六十年來之國學.臺北:正中書局.
-
程顥,程頤,王孝魚(點校)(2004).二程集.北京:中華書局.
-
黃俊傑(1993).戰後臺灣的教育與思想.臺北:東大圖書公司.
-
趙友林(2010).春秋三傳書法義例研究.北京:人民出版社.
-
錢玄同(1999).錢玄同文集.北京:中國人民大學出版社.
-
錢穆(1983).兩漢經學今古文平議.臺北:東大圖書有限公司.
-
戴君仁(1980).戴靜山先生全集.臺北:戴顧志鵷發行.
-
顧頡剛(2011).顧頡剛古史論文集.北京:中華書局.
|