题名

歐洲聯盟反恐政策初探

并列篇名

Analysing the Counter-Terrorism Policy of the EU

DOI

10.7071/EJIR.200907.0109

作者

張福昌(Fu-Chang Chang)

关键词

歐盟反恐政策 ; 司法與內政事務 ; 警政合作 ; 政府間合作 ; EU Counter Terrorism Policy ; Justice and Home Affairs ; Policing Cooperation ; Intergovernmental Cooperation

期刊名称

歐洲國際評論

卷期/出版年月

5期(2009 / 07 / 01)

页次

109 - 145

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

在21世紀恐怖主義國際化與複雜化的趨勢下,單一國家的政府已無法單獨解決恐怖主義問題,而必須採取跨國合作的方式共同打擊恐怖主義。反恐政策是歐盟的優先政策,過去幾年來,歐盟已建構打擊恐怖主義的機構藍圖,在歐盟第三支柱「司法與內政合作」中,打擊恐怖主義為其核心領域。此外,阿姆斯特丹條約下司法與內政事務的決策程序繼承了馬斯垂克條約所規範的4層架構:第一,司法與內政部長理事會;第二,常駐代表委員會第2組;第三,特別協調委員會;第四,工作小組。從決策過程中可以發現,歐盟司法與內政事務仍然屬於政府間合作的模式,歐盟會員國仍然掌握決定性的權力。然而,第三支柱「政府間合作」的特性,卻使目前的反恐效率大打折扣,歐盟的反恐政策雖然已經透過不同形式的機構和法令推展中,但是在機構的建制或情報的交換中,歐盟會員國仍扮演主要角色。若歐盟會員國無法將歐盟通過的法令確實納入國內法中,將會造成許多反恐法令的延宕。這種反恐政策仍然未能共同體化的障礙,迫使歐盟只能在反恐領域上扮演協調者的角色,會員國的立場是歐盟反恐政策能否落實與產生效果的關鍵因素。

英文摘要

The counter-terrorism policies of EU have constructed the blueprint of the current counter-terrorism strategy within the EU. It is the priority of the EU policies, as well as the core domain of the third pillar of EU. On the other hand, the decision-making procedure of ”Justice and Home Affairs” in the Amsterdam Treaty inherited the four levels of decision-making structure of the Maastricht treaty as listed below: Council of Justice and Home Affairs; Coreper II; Special Coordinating Committees; and Working Groups. It is to be seen from the decision-making procedure that EU's Justice and Home Affairs still appertain to inter-governmental cooperation. Member states own the authoritative power in this regard. However, the characteristic of this inter-governmental cooperation of the third pillar result in the present inefficiency of counter-terrorism. Although the counter-terrorism policy of EU has been promoted through different agencies and laws, member states remain the main character in the institution construction and information exchange mechanism. Provided that the member states do not incorporate EU's counter-terrorism policy into domestic law, many of the counter-terrorism laws and decrees will be suspended. Since the policing cooperation is not in the policy domain of communizing of EU, it can only play the roll of a coordinator in the area of counter-terrorism. The position of the member states is the key answer to the question if the counter-terrorism policy can be implemented and brought into effect.

主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
人文學 > 地理及區域研究
人文學 > 人類學及族群研究
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Official Journal of the European Union
  2. Archick, Kristin(2004).Europe and Counterterrorism Strengthening Police and Judicial Cooperation.CRS Report of Congress.
  3. Aus, Jonathan P.(2006).Eurodac: A Solution Looking for a Problem?.Centre for European Studies, University of Dublin, Working Working Paper, No. 09.
  4. Benyon, John(1994).Policing the European Union: The Changing Basis of Cooperation on Law Enforcement.International Affairs,70(3),497-517.
  5. Bertozzi, Stefano(2008).Schengen: Achievements and Challenges in Managing an Area Encompassing 3.6 million km2.Centre for European Policy Studies, Working Document No. 284.
  6. Bigo, Didier(2007).The Changing Landscape of European Liberty and Security: Mid-Term Report on the Results of the CHALLENGE Project.Research Paper, Centre for European Policy Studies, No. 4.
  7. Blekxtoon, Rob,Judge Blekxtoon(eds.),Wouter van Ballegooij(eds.)(2005).Handbook on the European Arrest Warrant.The Hague:T.M.C. Asser Press.
  8. Statewatch Analysis
  9. Bures, Oldrich(2008).Europol's Fledgling Counterterrorism Role.Terrorism and Political Violence,20(4),498-517.
  10. Chang, Fu-chang(2006).EU Enlargement and Security Challenge in Wider Black Sea Region.paper presented at the EU's 5th Enlargement: Challenge and Perspective.
  11. Costa, Jorga,Joanna Apap (ed.)(2004).Justice and Home Affairs in the EU: Liberty and Security Issues after Enlargement.USA:Edward Elgar.
  12. Council of the European Union(2002).Seville European Council of 2l and 22 June 2002-Presidency Conclusions, 13463/02.
  13. Council of the European Union(2003).Thessalonoki European Council 19 and 20 June 2003 Presidency Conclusions, 11638/03.Brussels:
  14. Council of the European Union(2003).Presidency Conclusions, Thessaloniki European Council 19-20.06.2003, 11638/03.
  15. Council of the European Union(2006).Analysis of the impact of SISone4ALL on the SISI+and SIS II projects, 14773/06.Brussels:
  16. Delfin, Mathieu(2006).Europol and the Policing of International Terrorism: Counter-Terrorism in a Global Perspective.Justice Quarterly,23(3),336-359.
  17. Institute of European Affairs
  18. Elsen, Charles(2007).From Maastricht to the Hague: the politics of judicial and police cooperation.ERA Forum,8(1),13-26.
  19. European Commission(2002).Towards Integrated Management of the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, COM (2002) 233 finalTowards Integrated Management of the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, COM (2002) 233 final,未出版
  20. European Commission(2004).Directorate-General Justice, Freedom and Security, Eurodac: The Fingerprints Database to Assist the Asylum Procedure.
  21. Passenger Name Record Agreement Signed
  22. Frontex.General Report of Fronter for 2005.
  23. House of Lords(2007).The European Union Committee: Schengen Information System II (SIS II).9th Report of Session 2006-07.
  24. House of Lords(2008).European Union Committee: Frontex: the EU external borders agency.9th Report of Session 2007-08.
  25. House of Lords,European Union Committee(2004).Judicial Cooperation in the EU: The Role of Eurojust.23rd Report of Session 2003-04.
  26. The EU/US Passenger Name Record (PNR) Agreement
  27. Katz, Etay(2007).Implementation of the Third Money Laundering Directive-An Overview.Law and Financial Market Review.
  28. E-Scharp
  29. Knelangen, Wilhelm,Erwin Müller(eds.),Patricia Schneider(eds.)(2006).Die Europäische Union im Kampf gegen den Terrorismus: Sicherheit vs. Freiheit.Baden-Baden:Nomos.
  30. Lavranos, Nikolaos(2003).Europol and the Fight Against Terrorism.European Foreign Affairs Review,8(2),259-275.
  31. Lugna, Lauri(2006).Institutional Framework of the European Union Counter-Terrorism Policy Setting.Baltic Security & Defence Review,8,101-127.
  32. Die Europäische Union im Kampf gegen den Terrorismus: Sicherheit vs. Freiheit
  33. Nilsson, Hans,David Spence (ed.)(2007).The European Union and Terrorism.UK:John Harper.
  34. Occhipinti, John D.(2003).The Politics of EU Police Cooperation-Toward a European FBI.London:Lynne Rienner.
  35. Peers, Steve(2000).EU Justice and Home Affairs Law.Edinburgh Gate:Pearson Education.
  36. Peers, Steve(2003).EU Response to Terrorism.The International and Comparative Law Quarterly,52(1),227-243.
  37. Plachta, Michael(2003).European Arrest Warrant: Revolution in Extradition?.European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice,11(2),178-194.
  38. Plachta, Michael,Wouter van Ballegooij,Judge R. Blekxtoon(eds.),Wouter van Ballegooij(eds.)(2005).Handbook on the European Arrest Warrant.The Hague:T.M.C. Asser Press.
  39. The Jean Monnet Program
  40. Sliedregt, Elies van(2007).The European Arrest Warrant: Between Trust, Democracy and the Rule of Law, Untroduction. The European Arrest Warrant: Extradition in Transition.European Constitutional Law Review,3,244-252.
  41. Spence, David (ed.)(2007).The European Union and Terrorism.London:John Harper.
  42. Sule, Satish(1999).Europol und europäischer Datenschutz.Baden-Baden:Nomos.
  43. Viadrina International Law Project
  44. Vlahovic, Rajka(2009).Eurojust: An Overview, Background, Structure and Work.Presentation at Regional Expert Workshop on International Co-operation on Counter Terrorism, Corruption and the fight against Transational Organised Crime.
  45. Wallace, Helen(2005).Policy-Making in the European Union.New York:Oxford.
  46. Wouters, Jan,Frederik Naert(2004).Of Arrest Warrants, Terrorist Offences and Extradition: An Apprisal of the EU's Main Criminal Law Measures Against Terrorism After 11 September.Common Market Law Review,41,4-22.
  47. 張福昌(2008)。歐盟東擴與外圍邊境安全:Frontex的角色與功能。「歐盟東擴研究學術研討會」論文,台北:
  48. 張福昌(2008)。歐洲警政署:歐盟反恐政策的基石?。「第四屆恐怖主義與國家安全學術研討會」論文,桃園:
  49. 張福昌(2007)。歐盟反恐戰略研究:制度、運作與網路。「第三屆歐洲聯盟人權保障學術研討會」論文,台北:
  50. 張福昌(2002)。邁向「歐洲聯盟」之路。台北:三民。
被引用次数
  1. 高佩珊(2017)。歐盟反恐政策及機制分析。長庚人文社會學報,10(2),163-189。
  2. 林泰和(2011)。歐洲聯盟打擊恐怖主義洗錢措施之演進與展望─後911 的政策研析。歐洲國際評論,7,29-63。
  3. 沈娟娟(2014)。從歐盟反恐政策檢視共同外交及安全政策之發展與挑戰。歐洲國際評論,10,65-102。