歐洲統合：亞太區域合作之典範或例外

The European Integration: Model or Exception for Asia-Pacific Regional Cooperation

10.7071/EJIR.201207.0039

卓忠宏(Chung-Hung Cho)

歐洲聯盟 ； 亞太經濟合作會 ； 開放式區域主義 ； 新區域主義 ； EU ； APEC ； Open Regionalism ； New Regionalism

歐洲國際評論

8期（2012 / 07 / 01）

39 - 57

繁體中文

歐洲聯盟及亞太經濟合作會議兩種截然不同之區域統合模式。在1990年代之前，歐洲統合提供地理位置相近國家藉由經濟合作促進區域安全穩定的發展模式。1990年代之後，歐洲多元化統合模式成為其他區域合作模仿典範。但歐洲統合經驗是否可作為亞太區域整合之模式？有些學者抱持否定看法，認為亞太國家內部歧異性過大；但有些學者反而對亞太多元化發展持正面看法。文章主要在比較歐洲聯盟與亞太區域經濟合作兩區域組織之異同。內文分為五部分：除前言外；第二部分定義區域主義之類型；第三在解析兩區域組織主要特色發展；第四從歐洲統合經驗檢驗亞太地區能從中學習之處；最後做出總結。

The EU and APEC are often described as two very different approaches to regional integration. The idea of Europe, as a most successful region in the global system, would have a similar model. Western Europe before 1990, offered an attractive model of formal economic integration among countries within a geographically well-defined security and stability. And Europe, after 1990, offered a more multiple example for that other regions could learn. However, is the model of European integration an applicable experience to Asia Pacific? Some arguments denied the possibility of regionalism in Asia-Pacific, as contrasted with the EU, in its diversity. Some scholars positively evaluate its diversity in Asia-Pacific specific value.This paper focuses mainly on the similarities and differences between the EU and APEC from the perspectives of comparative analysis. The content is divided into five sections: the introduction; a second section defining the varieties of regionalism; an explanation of the main determinants on the formation of regional block in Europe and Asia-Pacific; the fourth section tries to explain some lessons that economic integration in the Asia-Pacific could learn from the EU experiences; and the final section concludes the debates.

1. APEC, 2007. Asia Pacific at a Glance. .
2. Confederacion Internacional de Organizaciones Sindicales Libres / Red Sindical para Asia y el Pacifico (CIOSL/RSAP), 2005. Hacer frente al reto de cambiar la APEC: Declaración De La CIOSL/RSAP para la reunión de líderes de las economías de APEC. Busan, República de Corea, pp. 1-15..
3. Bowles, P.(1997).ASEAN, AFTA and the New Regionalsm.Pacific Affairs,70(2),219-233.
4. Camilleri, Joseph A.(2003).Regionalism in the new Asia-Pacific Order.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
5. Das, Dilip K.(1996).The Asia-Pacific Economy.New York:St Martin's Press.
6. Das, Dilip K.(2004).Regionalism in Global Trade.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
7. De Andrés, A. P.(1997).Leviatán.
8. De Melo, J.(ed.),Panagariya, A.(ed.)(1993).New Dimension in Regional Integration.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
9. Elek, A.(1998).Open Regionalism Going Global: APEC and the New Transatlantic Economic Partnership.Pacific Economic Paper,286,1-36.
10. Ethier, W. J.(1998).The New Regionalism.The Economic Journal,108(449),1149-1161.
11. Fawcett, L.(ed.),Hurrell, A.(ed.)(1995).Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
12. Fawcett, L.(ed.),Hurrell, A.(ed.)(1995).Regionalism in World Politics.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
13. Frankel, J. A.(1997).Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System.Washington, DC:Institute for International Economics.
14. Garnaut, R.(1996).Open Regionalism and Trade Liberalisation.Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
15. Garnaut, R.(ed.),Drysdale, P.(ed.)(1994).Asia Pacific Regionalism.Canberra:The Australian National University.
16. Golden, S.(comp.)(2004).Multilateralismo versus Unilateralismo en Asia: el peso internacional de los "valores asiáticos".Barcelona:CIDOB.
17. Heng, T. M.,Low, L.(1993).Is the ASEAN Free Trade Area a Second Best Option.Asian Economic Journal,7(3),275-298.
18. Hettne, B.(ed.),Inotai, A.(ed.),Sunkel, O.(ed.)(1999).Globalism and the New Regionalsim.New York:St Martin's Press.
19. Higgot, R.(1998).The International Political Economy of regionalism: the Asia-Pacific and Europe Compared.Regionalism and Global Economic Integration,New York:
20. Hill, C.(ed.),Smith, M.(ed.)(2005).International Relations and the European Union.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
21. IMF(2007).Regional Economic Outlook Asia Pacific.
22. Krugman, P.(1994).The Myth of Asia's Miracle.Foreign Affairs,73(6),1-13.
23. Lahiri, Sajal(ed.)(2001).Regionalism and Globalization: Theory and Practice.London:Routledge.
24. Langhammer, R.(1999).Regional Integration APEC Style: Lessons from Regional Integration EU Style.ASEAN Economic Bulletin,16(1),1-17.
25. Mattli, W.(1999).The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond.UK:Cambridge University Press.
26. Mittelman, J. H.(1999).Rethinking the New Regionalism in the Context of Globalization.Globalism and the New Regionalism,New York:
27. Oman, Ch.(1996).The Policy Challenges of Globalisation and Regionalisation.OECD Policy Brief,11,1-49.
28. Plaza Cerezo, Sergio(1995).La APEC: Un Proyecto de Integraicón Económica en la Cuenca del Pacífico.Información Comercial Española,748,137-138.
29. Pomfret, Richard(2010).Regionalism in East Asia: Why Has it Flourished since 2000 and How far Will It Go?.Singapore:World Scientific.
30. Sapir, André(1992).Regional Integration in Europe.Economic Journal,102,1491-1506.
31. Schott, Jaffrey(1991).Trading Blocs and the World Trading System.World Economy,14(1),1-18.
32. Siddique, M. A.(ed.)(2007).Regionalism, Trade and Economic Development in the Asia-Pacific Region.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
33. Soderbaum, F.(2003).Theories of New Regionalism.New York:Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
34. Tan, Joseph L.(ed.)(1996).AFTA in a Changing International Economy.Journal of Asian Economics,7(4),781-784.
35. Telo, M.(2007).European Union and New Regionalism.Hampshire, UK:Ashgate.
36. Wallace, William(1994).Regional Integration: the West European Experience.Washington:Brooking Institution.
37. Wunderlich, Jens-Uwe(2007).Regionalism, Globalisation and International Order: Europe and Southeast Asia.Aldershot, England:Ashgate.
38. Yamazawa, Ippei(1997).Recent Developments of APEC: Issues and Prospects of the Osaka Agenda.Regionalism versus Multilateral Trade Arrangements