超越測量－評量典範轉移的探索與啟示

Beyond Measurement: Exploring Paradigm Shift in Assessment

10.6776/JEPR.200703.0173

江文慈(Wen-Tzu Chiang)

評量典範 ； 典範轉移 ； 評量與學習 ； assessment paradigms ； paradigm shift ； assessment and learning

教育實踐與研究

20卷1期（2007 / 03 / 01）

173 - 199

繁體中文

評量正處於典範轉移之中，從心理計量模式走向更寛廣的教育評量模式，從測驗和考試文化轉向評量文化。評量典範的探討，有助於我們理解各種評量實踐的背後思維，讓我們更加審慎地選擇如何發現學生知道什麼以及可以做什麼的評量方法。本文的目的在探討評量典範的轉移，重新思索評量與學習的關係，以及對教育工作者的啟示。首先，說明評量典範轉移的脈絡背景，並依序探討「心理計量典範」、「脈絡化評量典範」和「個人化評量典範」。從評量典範的轉移中，可發現評量與學習的關係愈趨密切，且有更多的交融，進而延伸闡述三種評量與學習的關係取向，分別為「對學習的評量」、「促進學習的評量」，以及「評量即學習」等。過去，在教育現場中，多將焦點放在「對學習的評量」，亦即著重學習成果的總結性評量，而今則轉為關注「促進學習的評量」，目前更強調寓評量於學習之中，提出「評量即學習」的觀點。這三種評量取向在教學中各有其地位與功能，教師如何平衡地使用，便成為一個關鍵議題。最後，本文針對評量典範轉移所帶來的衝擊與挑戰，提出一些對教育工作者的省思與啟示

Assessment is undergoing a paradigm shift, from psychometrics to a broader model of educational assessment, from a testing and examination culture to an assessment culture. This article explores three assessment paradigms: psychometric paradigm, contextual paradigm, and personalized paradigm. Understanding different assessment paradigms can help us carefully decide how we attempt to discover what students know and we can do. Furthermore, assessment and learning are intimately intertwined and often indistinguishable from one another. Three relations between assessment and learning are discussed: ”assessment of learning”, ”assessment for learning”, and ”assessment as learning”. These three approaches all contribute to student learning but in vastly different ways. All three assessment approaches have their place; to maintain the right balance is the key challenge. It is important to understand them all, recognize the inevitable contradictions among them, and know which one you are using and why. Finally, implication and reflection on assessment paradigms are discussed.

1. Berlak, H.,F. M. Newman,E. Adams,D. A. Archbald,T. Burgess,J. Raven,T. A. Romberg (Eds.)(1992).Toward a new science of educational testing and assessment.Albany:State University of New York Press.
2. Berliner, D. C.,Biddle, B. J.(1995).The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America`s public schools.Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
3. Black, P.(1998).Testing: Friend or foe? The theory and practice of assessment and testing.London:The Falmer Press.
4. Black, P.,Harrison, C.,Lee, C.,Marshall, B.,William, D.(2003).Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice.Maidenhead:Open University Press.
5. Broadfoot, P.,H. Goldstein,T. Lewis (Eds.)(1996).Assessment: Problems, developments and statistical issues.New York:Wiley.
6. Carless, D.(2005).Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning.Assessment in Education,12(1),39-54.
7. Covington, M.(1992).Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform.New York:Cambridge University Press.
8. Dann, R.(2002).Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process.London and New York:Routledge, Falmer.
9. Darling-Hammond, L.(1994).Performance-based assessment and educational equity.Harvard Educational Review,64(1),5-30.
10. Earl, L. M.(2002).Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning.California, Thousand Oaks:Corwin Press, Inc.
11. Gipps, C. V.(1994).Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment.London:The Falmer Press.
12. Glaser, R.(1990).Toward new models for assessment.International Journal of Educational Research,14(5),475-483.
13. Hargreaves, A.,Earl, L.,Schmidt, M.(2002).Perspectives on alternative assessment reform.American Educational Research Journal,39(1),69-95.
14. Lazear, D.(1994).Multiple intelligence approaches to assessment: Solving the assessment conundrum.Tucson, Arizona:Zephyr Press.
15. Mabry, L.(1999).Portfolios plus: A critical guide to alternative assessment.California:Corwin Press, Inc.
16. Marzano, R.(2000).Transforming classroom grading.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17. Reineke, R. A.(1998).Challenging the mind, touching the heart: Best assessment practices.Thousand Oaks, California:Corwin Press, Inc.
18. Seligman, M.(1998).Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life.New York:Pocket Books.
19. Serafini, F.(2001).Three paradigms of assessment: Measurement, procedure, and inquiry.Reading Teacher,54(4),384-393.
20. Shepard, L. A.(2000).The role of assessment in a learning culture.Educational Researcher,29(7),4-14.
21. Shepard, L. A.(1991).Psychometricians` beliefs about learning influence testing.Educational Researcher,20(7),2-16.
22. Stiggins, R. J.(2002).Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning.Phi Delta Lappan,83(10),758-765.
23. Stiggins, R. J.(2001).The unfulfilled promise of classroom assessment.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,20(3),5-15.
24. Stiggins, R. J.(2005).Student-involved assessment for learning.New York:Merrill prentice Hall.
25. Weeden, P.,Winter, J.,Broadfoot, P.(2002).Assessment: What`s in it for schools?.London and New York:Routledge, Falmer.
26. Wiggins, G.(1989).A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment.Phi Delta Kappan,70(9),703-713.
27. Wiggins, G.(1998).Educative assessment.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
28. Wiggins, G.(1993).Assessing student performance.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
29. Wood,T. Horton (Ed.)(1990).Assessment debates.London:Hodder & Stoughton.
30. 吳毓瑩(1996)。評量的蛻變與突破－從哲學思潮與效度理論思考起。教育資料與研究，13，2-15。
31. 張稚美、郭俊賢、陳淑惠編譯(2000)。落實多元智慧教學評量。台北:遠流。
32. 教育部(2005)。國民小學及國民中學學生成績評量準則。台北:教育部。
33. 黃秀文(1996)。從傳統到變通：教學評量的省思。國立嘉義師院國民教育研究學報，2，1-26。
34. 楊銀興(2000)。台北，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
35. 盧雪梅(2000)。多元教學評量的理念與實務。教育研究月刊，76，57-66。
36. 謝祥宏、段曉林(2001)。教學與評量：一種互爲鏡像關係。科學教育月刊，241，2-11。

1. 陳亭潔、許珮甄(2016)。從國內外評量趨勢看國中歷史科試題評量與教學。中等教育，67(2)，119-137。
2. 賴淑蘭,吳佳虹(2020)。社會關懷課程設計曁不同期末評量方式呈現評量結果之探究：以中興大學通識課程為例。通識學刊：理念與實務，8(2)，71-105。
3. 謝棟漢、鄭修琦、蔡良敏、陳柏齡、張育誌、林威宏(2009)。以客觀結構臨床測驗評估畢業後一般醫學訓練之學員接受三個月專科相關選修—一般醫學內科訓練後之學習成效以及其所扮演之角色。醫學教育，13(3)，169-181。
4. 謝棟漢、鄭修琦、蔡良敏、陳柏齡、張育誌、林威宏、謝棟漢、鄭修琦、蔡良敏、陳柏齡、張育誌、林威宏、謝棟漢、鄭修琦、蔡良敏、陳柏齡、張育誌、林威宏、謝棟漢、鄭修琦、蔡良敏、陳柏齡、張育誌、林威宏(2009)。以客觀結構臨床測驗評估畢業後一般醫學訓練之學員接受三個月專科相關選修—一般醫學內科訓練後之學習成效以及其所扮演之角色。醫學教育，13(3)，169-181。
5. 鄭芬蘭、陳鳳如、張景媛(2014)。建構大學教師因應社會發展趨勢的有效能教學模式：探究教學歷程的雙中介效果。測驗學刊，61(1)，105-133。
6. 鍾昌宏、王國華(2015)。IPAD AIR─一個翻轉教學策略。教育脈動，1，92-100。
7. (2011)。十二年國教之落實途徑－從教學評量談起。教育研究，19，19-36。
8. (2014)。從學習品質保證機制到課室教學：高醫建立「深度學習」的取徑。教育研究月刊，240，34-56。
9. (2014)。孔恩的智慧－典範轉移。教育資料與研究，113，207-210。
10. (2019)。身體素養評量工具之探討。教育學報，47(2)，61-80。
11. (2024)。建構課程本位的幼兒表現評量系統：「幼兒園教保活動課程大綱」幼兒學習評量指標的編製。測驗學刊，71(2)，251-290。