重新檢視教育上懲罰運用的正當性

Reexamining the Legitimacy of Punishment Exerted in Education

10.6776/JEPR.200803.0033

李真文(Chen-Wen Li)

懲罰 ； 應報論 ； 嚇阻論 ； 改造論 ； 人權 ； 批判教育學 ； Foucault ； Punishment ； retributive theory ； deterrent theory ； reformative theory ； human right ； critical pedagogy ； Foucault

教育實踐與研究

21卷1期（2008 / 03 / 01）

33 - 63

繁體中文

本文之目的主要在檢視教育上運用懲罰的正當性。懲罰理論中應報論、嚇阻論及改造論，皆認為犯錯應罰。但以批判教育學及Foucault的觀點來看，懲罰所依恃的規則及仰賴的權威實有疑義。再者，不當使用懲罰（體罰），對學生人權是一大侵犯。這些挑戰以往懲罰所恃的正當理據，已經使得教師必須重新思考教育上是否以及如何運用懲罰。

This study aims to reexamine the legitimacy of punishment exerted in education. Although the justifications of punishment theories, retributive theory, deterrent theory, and reformative theory, were widely acknowledged, Foucault and Critical pedagogists challenged the rule and authority in the modern Capitalist society. Moreover, corporal punishment is deemed as a serious damage to the human rights of students. Teachers need to reconsider the role and exertion of punishment.

1. Bandura, A.(1997).Social learning theory.N. J.:Prentice-Hall.
2. Bean, P.(1981).Punishment: A philosophical and criminological inquiry.Oxford, England:Martin Robertson.
3. Bentham, J.(1996).An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
4. Bernstein, B.、王瑞賢譯(2006)。教育論述之結構化。台北市:巨流。
5. Burge, R. W.(1982).Do the guilty deserve punishment?.The Journal of Philosophy,79(4),193-210.
6. Cohen, S.(1985).Visions of social control: crime, punishment and classification.Cambridge:Polity Press.
7. Davis, M.(1986).Harm and retribution.Philosophy and Public Affairs,15(3),236-266.
8. Dyde, S. W.(1898).Hegel's conception of crime and punishment.The Philosophical Review,7(1),62-71.
9. Flew, A. G.(1954).Crime or disease.The British Journal of Sociology,5(1),49-62.
10. Foucault, M.,A. Sheridan (Trans.)(1977).Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison.New York:Pantheon.
11. Freire, P.,M. B. Ramos (Trans.)(1972).Pedagogy of the oppressed.NY:Routlege.
12. Garland, D.(1990).Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
13. Gramsci, A.(1971).Selection from the prison notebooks.NY:International.
14. Hollin, C. R.(Ed.)(2001).Handbook of offender assessment and treatment.UK:John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..
15. Honderich, T.(1989).Punishment: The supposed justifications.MA:Polity Press.
16. Jeffery, C. R.(1965).Criminal behavior and learning.Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science,56,294-300.
17. Kanpol, B.(1997).Issues and trends in critical pedagogy.NJ:Hampton Press.
18. Kleining, J.(1973).Punishment and desert.The Hague:Springer.
19. McLaren, P.(1989).Life in schools: Introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education.NY:Longman.
20. Peters, R. S.(1966).Ethics and education.London:Allen and Unwin.
21. Smart, B.、蔡采秀譯(1998)。傅科。台北市:巨流。
22. Straus, M. A.,Donnelly, M.,M. A. Straus,M. Donnelly (Eds.)(2005).Corporal punishment of children in theoretical perspective.London:Yale University Press.
23. Ten, C. L.(1987).Crime, guilt, and punishment: A philosophical introduction.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
24. Walker, N.(1991).Why punish?.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
25. Warnock, M. (Ed.)(1962).Utilitarianism.Glasgow:William Collins Sons & Co.
26. Wills, P.(1977).Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs.Farnborough, Eng.:Saxon House.
27. Zimring, F. E.,Hawkins, G. J.(1973).Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
28. 回答居仁學生的疑問
29. 禁止體罰立法說帖
30. 方永泉、李錦旭、王慧蘭主編(2006)。批判教育學：台灣的探索。台北市:心理。
31. 史英(1999)。體罰、威權與管理主義。人本教育札記，120，21。
32. 體罰辨義
33. 誰主張體罰？澄清「他律」的迷思
34. 李天健(1996)。辦教育，不要辦小孩－暫時性疼痛是永久的傷害。人本教育札記，83，36-41。
35. 林建福(2006)。德行、情緒、與道德教育。台北市:學富文化。
36. 高宣揚(2004)。傅科的生存美學：西方思想的起點與終結。台北市:五南。
37. 馮朝霖(2000)。教育哲學專論－主體、情性與創化。台北市:元照。
38. 黃炳煌(2002)。教育小語。台北市:高等教育。

1. 陳麗如(2014)。論「理」的介入．「情」的抑制─以《牡丹亭》與《紅樓夢》的花園、閨訓、懲罰事件為中心。興大中文學報，35，247-299。