偏遠地區小學教師對弱勢社區環境之覺知及其教學回應

An Analysis of the Rural Area Elementary School Teachers' Awareness of the Disadvantaged Social Environment and Their Responsive-Teaching of Schooling

10.6776/JEPR.201012.0037

簡良平(Liang-Ping Juan)

弱勢社區環境 ； 教學回應 ； 教師課程意識 ； the disadvantaged social environment ； responsive teaching ； teachers' curriculum consciousness

教育實踐與研究

23卷2期（2010 / 12 / 01）

37 - 64

繁體中文

本文屬實證研究，為研究者於2005年至2007年間，實地訪談與觀察北台灣縣市偏遠地區國小實務工作者教學之後的研究發現。本文依據貧窮社區特質、教育社會學中文化資本與社會資本之概念、及增權賦能教學回應弱勢者教育需求等觀點，成為資料分析的視角。本文發現：(1)教師覺知偏遠社區環境缺乏文化資本與社會資本因素，且深刻影響學童學習態度與學業成就；(2)教師教學回應類型有二：大部分教師致力於補救教學及力行道德規訓策略，提升學童學科成績及形塑道德行為；少數教師於學校層級發展連結社區與家長，意圖建構學校－社區－家長連結社會關係的課程。基於兩種教學回應類型之教師比例懸殊，本文進而討論(3)教師課程意識受到學校課程脈絡既定假設及教師自身屬性侷限，左右弱勢者教育之課程實踐取向。本文建議強化偏小教師覺知與行動關係，多鼓勵教師拓展教師課程意識面向，慎思如何提升弱勢學童學習之課程與教學，對弱勢學童有實質關懷與長遠助益。

From September 2005 to June 2007, the researcher invited 43 teachers in rural area elementary schools, north Taiwan by random-sample for interviews and instruction observation. The data were analyzed from the concepts of the poverty theories, sociology of education, and critical pedagogy for empowering the disadvantaged students. The finding of the research was that the teachers actually were aware of the problems that there were many shortages of social capital and cultural capital in the poor communities and children's families, but most of the teachers' responsive-teaching and school curriculum practice usually were conservative. The number of teachers who adopted knowledge-center curriculum in their classrooms was larger than the number of teachers who adopted social construction curriculum and learner-centered curriculum. The researcher tried to explore how the assumptions that always existed in the school curriculum context strongly formed the teachers' curriculum consciousness and their curriculum practice. Finally, the research suggests that we can encourage teachers to reflect their views concerning education of the disadvantaged students and deliberately decide their curriculum practice in order to elevate the quality of rural elementary schooling.

1. Apple, M. W.(2001).Educating the "right" way: Markets, standards, God, and inequality.N.Y.:RoutledgeFalmer.
2. Ayers, W.(2004).Teaching the personal and the political: Essays on hope and justice.N.Y.:Teachers College, Columbia University.
3. Ayers, W.(2004).Teaching toward freedom: Moral commitment and ethical action in the classroom.Boston, MA:Beacon Press.
4. Ayers, W.(ed.),Quinn, T.(ed.),Stovall, D.(ed.)(2009).Handbook of social justice in education.N.Y.:Routledge.
5. Banks, J. A.(2006).Cultural diversity and education: Foundation, curriculum, and teaching.Boston, MA:Pearson.
6. Bell, L. A.(2002).Sincere fictions: The pedagogical challenges of preparing white teachers for multicultural classrooms.Equity & Excellence in Education,35(3),236-244.
7. Books, S.(2004).Poverty and schooling in the U.S.: Contexts and consequences.London:Lea Publishers.
8. Carlson, D.(2005).Things to come: Teachers' work and urban school reform.Urban education with an attitude,N.Y.:
9. Coleman, J.(1990).Foundations of social theory.Cambridge, MA:Belknap.
10. Freire, P.(1974).Education for critical consciousness.N.Y.:Sheerd & Ward Ltd..
11. Freire, P.(1970).Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York:Seabury Press.
12. Freire, P.(1998).Pedagogy of freedom: Ethic, democracy, and civic courage.Lanham, Md.:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
13. Harris, K.(1994).Teachers: Constructing the future.London:The Falmer Press.
14. Harris, K.,唐宗清（譯）(1994).教師與階級－馬克思主義分析.台北:桂冠.
15. Hollins, E. R.(Ed.)(1996).Transforming curriculum for a culturally diverse society.Mahwah, NJ:LEA.
16. hooks, bell(2003).Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope.N.Y.:Routledge.
17. Johnson, L.(ed.),Finn, M. E.(ed.),Lewis, R.(ed.)(2005).Urban education with an attitude.N.Y.:State University of New York Press.
18. Ladson-Billings, G.(2001).Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
19. Langhout, R. D.,Rappaport, J.,Simmons, D.(2002).Integrating community into the classroom: Community gardening, community involvement, and project-based learning.Urban Education,37,323-349.
20. Milner, H.(2003).Teacher reflection and race in cultural contexts: History, meanings and methods in teaching.Theory into Practice,42(3),173-180.
21. Nieto, S.(1999).The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities.N.Y.:Teachers College Press.
22. Noddings, N.(2005).The challenge to care in schools: An alternatives approach to education.N. Y.:Teachers College Press.
23. Payne, R. K.(2005).A framework for understanding poverty.Highlands, TX:Aha! Process, Inc..
24. Richardson, J. C.(Ed.)(1986).Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education.N.Y.:Greenwood Press.
25. Sears, J. T.(Ed.),Marshall, J. Dan(Ed.)(1991).Teaching and thinking about curriculum.N.Y.:Teachers College Press.
26. Shapiro, H. Svi(ed.),Purpel, D. E.(ed.)(1993).Critical social issues in American education.N.Y.:Longman.
27. Shor, I.(1992).Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change.Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press.
28. Smith, B.(2007).Accessing social capital through the academic mentoring process.Equity & Excellence in Education,40,36-46.
29. Stone, F. A.(1994).Educational reconstruction and today's teacher education.Teacher Education Quarterly,21(4),9-21.
30. Symeou, L.(2007).Cultural capital and family involvement in children's education: Tales from two primary schools in Cyprus.British Journal Sociology of Education,28(4),473-487.
31. Tanner, D.,Tanner, L. N.(1980).Curriculum development: Theory into practice.N.Y.:Macmillan.
32. Taylor Jr., H. L.(2005).Connecting community development and urban school reform.Urban education with an attitude,N.Y.:
33. Trifonas, P. P.(Ed.)(2000).Revolutionary pedagogies: Cultural politics, instituting education, and the discourse of theory.N.Y.:RoutledgeFalmer.
34. 王麗雲,甄曉蘭(2007).台灣偏遠地區教育機會均等政策模式之分析與反省.教育資料集刊,36,25-46.
35. 呂朝賢,王德睦(2000).1960s以降的美國貧窮理論：回顧與整合.人文社會科學集刊,12(1),149-195.
36. 簡良平(2009).偏遠國小學校課程實踐脈絡分析：教育促成社會正義之觀點.初等教育學刊,34,1-24.
37. 簡良平(2006).從家長教育支持度解讀偏遠國中教育問題.「偏遠國中教育問題與相關政策檢討研討會」會議手冊暨論文集,台北:
38. 簡良平(2008).偏遠地區教師批判教學覺知與課程實踐連結：弱勢者教育的觀察與反省.課程與教學改革：理論與實務,台北:

1. 蔡東鐘、許景綾、張美珍(2015)。國小學生擔任科學實驗站解說員對其科學態度及表達能力之影響。博物館學季刊，29(1)，23-35。
2. 陳成宏,胡志翔,林俊瑩(2020)。學校少數族群學生比例對其學習成就的影響。臺北市立大學學報.教育類，51(2)，1-26。
3. 陳建志(2020)。滴水穿石：偏遠地區國小教師實踐正向管教於弱勢學童之個案研究。嘉大教育研究學刊，45，29-58。
4. 龔心怡、李靜儀(2015)。影響國中經濟弱勢學生之學業表現與中輟傾向之因素：以「脈絡－自我－行動－結果」之動機發展自我系統模式為取向。教育科學研究期刊，60(4)，55-92。
5. 賴慧敏、鄭博文、陳清檳(2015)。偏遠地區與一般地區國中生學習成就差異比較：以「反事實」分析。測驗學刊，62(2)，127-151。
6. 連穎、張靜薇、柯平順(2014)。旗山偏鄉早療中心資源連結合作之困境與策略。臺灣社會工作學刊，14，157-190。
7. 劉修豪、林意雪(2012)。課後輔導教學的社會化之理解。教育與社會研究，25，1-32。
8. 彭于萍、翁振益、林景琦(2016)。「愛迪生出發」公益學習活動之過程體驗及活動效益研究。博物館學季刊，30(4)，31-53。
9. 宋佩芬(2016)。扶助弱勢學生學習：教師教學信念與教學取向之探究。嘉大教育研究學刊，37，149-180。
10. 吳雅萍(2020)。淺談偏鄉教育之現況與問題。教育研究與實踐學刊，67(2)，41-50。
11. 鄭博文、廖錦文、俞錚蓉、江耀宗、石宜正(2016)。比較偏遠與一般地區學生數學表現之差異：傾向分數配對法的分析。科學教育學刊，24(S)，537-560。
12. 鄭芬蘭、黃詩媛(2016)。啟發學習力躍升方案對國小偏鄉弱勢學童之實驗研究。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，41，1-25。
13. 鄭景元(2021)。教師對文化殊異資賦優異學生之覺知探究。資優教育論壇，19(2)，74-96。
14. 鄭聖敏,胡心慈,柯惠菁(2023)。建構離島特殊教育支持系統之研究。教育科學研究期刊，68(3)，1-34。
15. 莊淑芬、張美珍、林淑歆(2013)。探討偏遠地區科學實驗站學生解說員之科學態度。科技博物，17(3)，59-86。
16. (2012)。都市原住民部落兒童的學習陪伴─社會工作結合大學資源與社區工作的啟發。社區發展季刊，139，325-340。
17. (2012)。弱勢學生師生關係、社會支持及其學習任務價值之相關研究。臺東大學教育學報，23(2)，1-26。
18. (2012)。弱勢學生未來時間觀、學習自我效能及學習任務價值之研究。中正教育研究，11(1)，1-44。
19. (2015)。數位學伴補救教學學習成效評估模式之建構─學童學習動機整合觀點。教育研究學報，49(2)，65-94。
20. (2018)。偏遠地區學校發展與澳洲昆士蘭相關政策案例探討。教育研究月刊，287，96-111。
21. (2018)。探索軍事院校學生生活管教網絡：發現與關懷弱勢者。臺東大學教育學報，29(1)，1-30。
22. (2019)。表達性藝術團體對兒童人際關係及情緒管理之影響。靜宜人文社會學報，13(3)，67-104。
23. (2022)。臺灣教育的城鄉差距：偏鄉學校實徵研究的分析。教育研究月刊，334，4-19。
24. (2024)。循環音韻治療法應用遠距科技復健模式於偏遠地區重度語音異常兒童之成效。台灣聽力語言學會雜誌，50，11-41。