國小高年級媒體素養課程規劃與教學實施之行動研究

An Action Research of Curriculum Planning and Implementation of Media Literacy Education for the 6th Grade Students

10.6776/JEPR.201112.0036

簡梅瑩(Mei-Ying Chien)

媒體素養教育 ； 主題教學 ； 批判思考 ； 行動研究 ； media literacy education ； topic teaching ； critical thinking ； action research

教育實踐與研究

24卷2期（2011 / 12 / 01）

33 - 63

繁體中文

學校實施媒體素養教育之重要性，在能提供學生發展對不同媒體的認識，及參與反思媒體內容及影響力的學習機會。研究者以協同合作之教學行動研究形式，徵詢一位國小六年級教師參與合作，並以其授課班級為研究場域，共同規劃及評估媒體素養教育實施過程對教師教學專業知能及學生媒體素養能力發展之影響。資料收集方法包括：研究者省思日誌、教室觀察記錄與教師省思、與教師之半結構式錄音訪談、與學生小組之錄影訪談、課程實施前後之結構式問卷調查，及相關文件之收集與分析。根據資料分析結果，此文以納入協同合作形式於此課程實施之影響，提出結論。一、知識經驗互惠與課程規劃發展：研究者與教師藉由彼此間相互回饋方式，持續課程規劃發展與教學反思，此歷程不僅幫助教師能整合媒體於教學主題的擬定實施，並能反思媒體教材的適當與應用性；而藉由實施之教學主題與方法，學生則受益於能知覺思考媒體內容，及認識不同媒體特性與近用方式。二、權力對等關係與教學實施限制：研究者對權力對等關係的關注及避免教師教學壓力的考量，卻也相對限制教學過程中的反省修正，致使此課程在促進師生間充分對話及發展學生問題思考能力部份，均有待再修正改進。

The implementation of media literacy education in schools should be directed towards developing students' understanding of the different types of media while providing them with opportunities for personal reflection on the content and effects of media. An action research was carried out with a group of grade-6 students and their teacher at one elementary school to evaluate the teacher's teaching and students' learning about media. Multiple methods of data collection were used for the purpose of triangulation, including research diary, classroom observations and field-notes taking, teacher's reflective feedback, semi-structured tape-recorded interviews with the teacher, group video-recorded interviews with the students, questionnaires, and documents. Based on the research findings, conclusions in two respects were given on evaluating the impact of adopting a mutual collaborative mode in the conduction of this action research. 1. Mutual feedback and curriculum planning: the on-going mutual feedback between the teacher and the researcher had helped the teacher develop specific skills of integrating media into topic teaching and reflection on media use. The students had also benefited from learning the media including the development of a better understanding of media and their use. 2. Equal status and teaching limitations: the researcher's concerns over sustaining equal status to lessen the teacher's tension had, to some extent, limited our mutual feedback on the teaching process. Therefore, there should have been more substantive dialogues between the teacher and the students, and the critical thinking skills of students should also have been elicited and developed.

1. 呂傑華、陳逸雯(2009)。參與媒體素養研習之國民小學教師實施媒體素養教育之調查研究。教育實踐與研究，22(1)，1-40。
   連結：
2. 林佩璇(2009)。課程行動研究的實踐論述：從自我到社會文化。教育實踐與研究，22(2)，95-122。
   連結：
3. Alvermann, D. E.,Hagood, M. C.(2000).Critical media literacy: Research, theory, and practice in "new time".The Journal of Educational Research,93(3),193-205.
4. Aufderheide, P.(1992).Media literacy: A report of the national leadership conference on media literacy.Washington, DC:The Aspen Institute.
5. Banks, J. A.(1994).Multiethnic education: Theory and practice (3rd ed.).Boston,MA:Allyn and Bacon.
6. Berg, B. L.(2004).Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.).Boston,MA:Pearson.
7. Buckingham, D.(2003).Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture.Cambridge:Polity.
8. Cheung, C. K.(2005).The relevance of media education in primary schools in Hong Kong in the age of new media: A case study.Educational Studies,31(4),361-374.
9. Christ, W. G.,Potter, W. J.(1998).Media literacy, media education, and the academy.Journal of Communication,48(1),33-43.
10. Considine, D. M.(1995).Are we there yet? An update on the media literacy movement.Educational Technology,35(4),32-43.
11. Davis, J.(1990).Five important ideas to teach your kids about TV.Media & Values,52/53,16-19.
12. Denzin, N. K.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y. S.(Ed.)(1994).Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
13. Fals-Borda, O.(Ed.),Rahman, M. A.(Ed.)(1991).Action and Knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research.New York:Intermediate Technology.
14. Furlong , J.,Maynard, T.(1995).Mentoring student teachers: The growth of professional knowledge.London:Routledge.
15. Gainer, J. S.,Valdez-Gainer, N.,Kinard, T.(2009).The elementary bubble project:Exploring critical media literacy in a fourth-grade classroom.The Reading Teacher,62(8),674-683.
16. Holter, I. M.,Schwartz-Barcott, D.(1993).Action research: What is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing?.Journal of Advanced Nursing,128,298-304.
17. Huck, S. W.(2000).Reading statistics and research.New York:Longman.
18. Kemmis, S.(Ed.),McTaggert, R.(Ed.)(1988).The action research reader (3rd ed.).Geelong, Australia:Deakin University Press.
19. Kemmis, S.,McTaggart, R.(1988).The action research planner.Geelong,Australi:Deakin University Press.
20. Kubey, R. W.(2003).Why U.S. media education lags behind the rest of the English-speaking world.Television & New Media,4,351-370.
21. Kubey, R.(Ed.)(1997).Media literacy in the information age.New Brunswick, NJ:Transaction.
22. Lacina, J.(2005).Media literacy and learning.Childhood Education,82(2),118-121.
23. Mckernan, J.(1991).Curriculum action research: A hand book of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner.London:Kogan Publishers.
24. Scharrer, E.(2002).Making a case for media literacy in the curriculum: Outcomes and assessment.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,46(4),354-358.
25. Scheibe, C.(2004).A deeper sense of literacy: Curriculum-driven approaches to media literacy in the K-12 classroom.American Behavioral Scientist,48,60-68.
26. Schwarz, G.(2001).Literacy expanded: The role of media literacy in teacher education.Teacher Education Quarterly,28(2),111-119.
27. Semali, L.(2003).Ways with visual languages: Making the case for critical media literacy.The Clearing House,76(6),271-277.
28. Thoman, E.(2003).Media literacy: A guide tour of the best resources for teaching.The Clearing House,76(6),278-283.
29. Thoman, E.(1999).Skills and strategies for media education.Educational Leadership,56(5),50-54.
30. Thoman, E.(1995).Operational definition of media literacy.Los Angeles:Center for Media Literacy.
31. Trier, J.(2006).Teaching with media and popular culture.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,49(5),434-438.
32. Wan, G.,Gut, D. M.(2008).Media use by Chinese and U.S. secondary students: Implications for media literacy education.Theory into Practice,47,178-185.
33. 吳美美(1996)。資訊時代人人需要資訊素養。社教雙月刊，73，4-5。
34. 吳翠珍(2004)。台灣媒體教育的實驗與反思。台灣教育，629，28-39。
35. 吳翠珍編、陳世敏編(2007)。媒體素養教育。台北:巨流。
36. 李承宇(2002)。教師應具備之資訊素養：批判思考觀點。國民教育，42(6)，67-73。
37. 李承宇(2005)。媒體素養的本質。國民教育，45(6)，18-22。
38. 林子斌(2005)。英國媒體教育之發展及其在國定課程中的角色。當代教育研究，13(3)，115-148。
39. 張慈軒、吳雪绮(2006)。批判教育學的媒體素養探討。教育資料與研究，72，119-132。
40. 教育部(2002)。媒體素養教育政策白皮書。台北:教育部。
41. 陳淑敏(2002)。媒體素養的理論分析。教育資料與研究，47，100-105。
42. 黃西玲(2009)。「媒體識讀」的教育發展與課程設計：國際趨勢的分析。教育研究月刊，185，74-86。
43. 楊巧玲(2006)。不一樣的教學原理─從自我認識到社會參與。台北:心理。
44. 楊洲松(2004)。解放與賦權─媒體素養教育的理念與實踐。台灣教育，629，2-8。
45. 蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。台北:五南。
46. 簡梅瑩(2009)。媒體素養教育於增能學生文化反思與終身學習能力：國中小之教學規劃與發展。教學科技與媒體季刊，87，102-114。

1. 林秋美(Chiou-Mei Lin)(2021)。Henry Giroux再現的批判教學論在媒體素養教育上的啟示。臺灣教育哲學。5(1)。118-149。