题名

杜威芝加哥實驗學校道德實踐課程之探析

并列篇名

A Study on Dewey's Moral Practice Curriculum in the Laboratory School of the University of Chicago

DOI

10.6776/JEPR.201206.0001

作者

鄭玉卿(Yu-Ching Cheng)

关键词

杜威 ; 芝加哥實驗學校 ; 道德實踐課程 ; John Dewey ; moral practice curriculum ; the Laboratory School of the University of Chicago

期刊名称

教育實踐與研究

卷期/出版年月

25卷1期(2012 / 06 / 01)

页次

1 - 27

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

杜威主張教育就是生活本身的信念,道德應該是身體力行民主生活的學習經驗。他批評傳統學校教育將道德作為一個學科,灌輸道德知識的教學,是錯誤且無效的教育。本文從教育史的角度,透過第一手史料,說明杜威在芝加哥實驗學校中進行道德實踐課程與教學的理念與實際作法,藉以說明杜威民主社會的道德教育之主張。全文共分杜威實驗學校中的道德實踐課程的內容與教學方法,杜威實驗學校作為其道德教育理念的具體行動,以及實驗學校的道德課程在教育史上的意義等重點進行探究,期能透過杜威實驗學校以生活為核心的道德實踐課程,一方面呈現芝加哥實驗學校的道德教育觀,一方面透過歷史事實提供教育人士有關學校生活中落實道德教育的可能性之參考。

英文摘要

Moral education is a learning experience by taking part in life. It is the faith of Dewey who proposed education is life itself. He criticized it was wrong and useless in traditional education system which defined moral education as a subject and infused the moral knowledge into students. This article will review the curriculums and teaching in the Laboratory School of the University of Chicago established by Dewey from the point of view of educational history. The author tries to explore the ideas of Dewey's moral education and achievements of practice in the laboratory school. There are three major parts in this article, including the moral ideas and practice in laboratory school, Dewey's criticism of moral education in traditional schools, and the real value of moral practice curriculum in the laboratory school in education history. The author hopes this article will provide readers to know the ideas of 'learning by doing' about moral practice education. And finally, the author would like to illustrate the viewpoint of moral education in the laboratory school and share thoughts about how to carry out moral education by practicable curriculums and teaching to educators who are concerned with moral education in school.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Dewey, J. (1888). The ethics of democracy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The early work (1882-1898) (Vol.1, pp.227-249). Carbondale, IL: The Southern Illinois University Press
  2. Dewey, J. (1891). Outline of a critical theory of ethics. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The early work (1882-1898) (Vol.3, pp.237-389). Carbondale, IL: The Southern Illinois University Press
  3. Dewey, J. (1899a). The school and society, being three lecture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  4. Dewey, J. (1898a). The university elementary school, general outline of school of work. University Record, III(40), 253-254
  5. The University of Chicago Press (1898). The university elementary school (group IV). University Record, III(32), 201-202
  6. Dewey, J. (1909). Moral principles in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company
  7. Dewey, J. (1915). Schools of to-morrow. New York: E. P. Button & Company
  8. Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  9. Dewey, J. (1897b). The university elementary school, studies and methods. University Record, II(8), 72-75
  10. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillianco
  11. 教育部(2009)。教育部品德教育促進方案(修訂版)。2011 年5 月12 日,取自http://ce.naer.edu.tw/index3-1.html
  12. Dewey, J. (1920). Reconstruction in philosophy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works (1899-1924) (Vol.12, pp.77-201). Carbondale, IL: The Southern Illinois University Press
  13. Dewey, J. (1898b). The university elementary school: Group IX. University Record, III(38), 239-240
  14. Tyler, R. (1991). The long-term impact of the Dewey School. The Curriculum Journal, 3(2), 125-129
  15. Dewey, J. (1896b). The university school. University Record, I(32), 417-419. Dewey, J. (1897a). My pedagogic creed. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The early work (1895-1898) (Vol.5, pp.84-95). Carbondale, IL: The Southern Illinois University Press
  16. The University of Chicago Press (1897b). School record, notes and plan XXI: The university of Chicago school. University Record, II(4), 37-38
  17. Dewey, J. (1896a). Pedagogy as a university discipline (II). University Record, I(26), 361-363
  18. Dewey, J. (1899b). The university elementary school: Group V. University Record, III(43), 281-282
  19. Dewey, J. (1936).The theory of the Chicago experiment. In K. C. Mayhew & A. C. Edwards (Eds.), The Dewey school: The Laboratory School of the University of Chicago, 1896-1903 (pp.463-477). New York: Atherton Press
  20. Dewey, J. (1932). Ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Company
  21. Adams, J.(1994)。The evolution of educational theory。Bistrol, UK:Thoemmes Press。
  22. Cremin, L. A.(1961).The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education.New York:Vintage.
  23. Delors, J.(1996).Learning, The treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International commission on education for the twenty-first century.London:HMSO Books.
  24. Dewey, J.(1955).Democracy and education.New York:Macmillianco.
  25. Gould, L. L.(1974).The progressive era.New York:Syracuse University Press.
  26. Gutek, G. L.(1997).Historical and philosophical foundations of education: A biographical introduction.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill.
  27. Hamilton, D.(1990).Curriculum history.Geelong, Australia:Deakin University Press.
  28. Hayes, W.(2007).The progressive education movement: Is it still a factor in today's schools.Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  29. Hirst, P.(Ed.),White, P.(Ed.)(1998).Philosophy of education: Major theme in the analytic tradition.London:Rouledge.
  30. Kelman, S.(1996).American democracy and the public good.New York:Harcourt Brace & Company.
  31. Kliebard, H. M.(2002).Changing course: American curriculum reform in the 20th century.New York:Teachers College Press.
  32. Kliebard, H. M.(ed.)(1995).The struggle for the American curriculum.New York:Routledge.
  33. Kridel, C.(Ed.),Bullough, R. V.(Ed.),Shaker, P.(Ed.)(1996).Teachers and mentors: Profiles of distinguished twentieth century professors of education.New York:Garland.
  34. Mayhew, K. C.,Edwards, A. C.(1965).The Dewey school: The Laboratory School of the University of Chicago, 1896-1903.New York:Atherton Press.
  35. Tanner, D.,Tanner, L.(1990).History of the school curriculum.New York:Macmillan Publishing Company.
  36. Tanner, L.(1997).Dewey's laboratory school: Lesson for today.New York:Teachers College Press.
  37. Tyler, R.(1991).The long-term impact of the Dewey School.The Curriculum Journal,3(2),125-129.
  38. Westbrook, R. B.(1991).John Dewey and American democracy.New York:Cornell University Press.
  39. 吳怡靜(2007)。公民素質,打敗金磚四國的利器。2007親子天下專刊,22。
  40. 吳俊升(1991)。教育哲學大綱。台北:商務印書館。
  41. 吳清基編、曾美蕙編(2006)。品格教育回流。台北:聯經出版社。
  42. 李琪明(2007)。什麼是品格教育。2007親子天下專刊,56-60。
  43. 周蕙菁(2003)。品格:新世紀的第一堂課。天下雜誌,287,34-40。
  44. 金玉梅編(2007)。教出品格力。台北:天下雜誌。
  45. 金玉梅編(2006)。關鍵能力。台北:天下雜誌。
  46. 張柯圳(1997)。Dewey芝加哥時代的教育思想。臺灣大學哲學論評,20,77-146。
  47. 鄭玉卿(2000)。書評:杜威《教育中的道德原理》。哲學與文化,429,105-108。
  48. 鄭玉卿(2008)。國科會專案計畫期末報告國科會專案計畫期末報告,國科會。
  49. 蕭富元編(2003)。品格決勝負。台北:天下雜誌。
被引用次数
  1. 劉蔚之(2020)。美國社會效率派教育研究典範的崛起:以芝加哥大學教育系早期的課程角逐為例。課程與教學,23(2),185-215。
  2. 宋明娟(2019)。杜威實驗學校的課程理念與實踐。教育研究集刊,65(1),1-41。