题名

學校分散式領導構面之探析:領導者、追隨者與情境三元互動之檢證

并列篇名

Exploring the Dimensions of School Distributed Leadership: Verification of the Triarchic Theory of Interaction among the Leaders, Followers, and Situation

DOI

10.6776/JEPR.201212.0225

作者

張奕華(I-Hua Chang);顏弘欽(Hung-Chin Yen)

关键词

分散式領導 ; 教育領導 ; 測量模式 ; distributed leadership ; educational leadership ; measurement model

期刊名称

教育實踐與研究

卷期/出版年月

25卷2期(2012 / 12 / 01)

页次

225 - 253

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探析學校分散式領導的因素構面,並據以檢證其因素結構。首先,經相關文獻之探討,本研究以領導者、追隨者與情境三元互動做為理論之架構,進而發展測量題項。其次,以1027位台灣地區公立國民小學教師為研究樣本,並隨機分為測定樣本、效度樣本、與複核樣本進行分析。經探索性因素分析,本研究確立學校分散式領導測量模式包含「校長的開放思維」、「成員的正向信念」、「成員的積極參與」與「學校的情境氛圍」等四個因素構面;再者,經模式競爭之比較,本研究發現多因素斜交模式與二階因素模式均適合用以詮釋學校分散式領導之因素結構。本研究之結果,提供後續研究一個明確的理論架構,並能據以測量,以進一步瞭解學校分散式領導的現況。

英文摘要

This study explores the dimensions of school distributed leadership, verifying its factor structure. First, based on discussions in related literature, this study used the triarchic theory of interaction among the leaders, followers, and situation as the basis of its theory before developing the measurement items. Second, 1,027 teachers from public elementary schools in Taiwan were selected for data collection, and were randomly divided into calibration sample, validation sample, and cross-validation sample. Using exploratory factor analysis, four factor dimensions (open-minded principal, members' positive beliefs, members' positive participation, and school atmosphere) for the measurement model were determined. To further validate the appropriateness of the measurement model, we compared the strategies of the competing models, finding that the multiple-factor oblique model and the hierarchical model were the appropriate measurement models for school distributed leadership. The results of this study provide a theoretical framework and can be used to measure and to better understand the status of school distributed leadership.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 秦夢群、吳勁甫(2009)。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與組織效能關係之研究:中介效果模式之檢證。當代教育研究,17(3),83-124。
    連結:
  2. 陳佩英、焦傳金(2009)。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構:一所高中教學創新計畫的個案研究。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),55-86。
    連結:
  3. 蔡進雄(2005)。超越轉型領導:國民中小學校長新轉型領導影響教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊,13,37-63。
    連結:
  4. 謝傳崇、王瓊滿(2011)。國民小學校長分佈式領導、教師組織公民行為對學生學習表現影響之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,28(1),35-66。
    連結:
  5. 謝傳崇、李尚儒(2011)。校長分佈式領導對學生學習表現影響之研究─以學校知識創造為中介變項。教育理論與實踐學刊,23(1),149-181。
    連結:
  6. Pedersen, J., Yager, S., & Yager, R. (2010). Distributed leadership influence on professional development initiatives: Conversations with eight teachers. Retrieved May 7, 2012, from http://www.academicleadership.org/516/distributed_leadership_influence_on_professional_development_initiatives_conversations_with_eight_teachers/
  7. Anderson, J.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411-423.
  8. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equations models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
  9. Bass, B. M.,Jung, D. I.,Avolio, B. J.,Berson, Y.(2003).Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership.Journal of Psychology,88(2),207-218.
  10. Brooks, J. S.,Jean-Marie, G.,Normore, A. H.,Hodgins, D. W.(2007).Distributed leadership for social justice: Exploring how influence and equity are stretched over an urban high school.Journal of School Leadership,17(4),378-408.
  11. Dvir, T.,Eden, D.,Avolio, B.,Shamir, B.(2002).Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment.Academy of Management Journal,45(4),735-744.
  12. Firestone, W. A.,Martinez, M. C.(2007).Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: Changing instructional practice.Leadership and Policy in Schools,6(1),3-35.
  13. Gordon, Z. V.(2005).Connecticut,Central Connecticut State University..
  14. Gronn, P.(2003).Leadershio: who needs it?.School Leadership and Management,23(3),267-290.
  15. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis with readings.Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice Hall.
  16. Harris, A.(2008).Distributed leadership: According to the evidence.Journal of Educational Administration,46(2),172-188.
  17. Harris, A.,Leithwood, K.,Day, D.,Sammons, P.,Hopkins, D.(2007).Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence.Journal of Educational Change,8(4),337-347.
  18. HayGroup(2004).The five pillars of distributed leadership in school.Nottingham, UK:National College for School Leadership.
  19. Heck, R.,Hallinger, P.(2009).Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement.American Educational Research Journal,46(3),659-689.
  20. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6(1),1-55.
  21. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1998).Fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods,3(4),424-453.
  22. Hulpia, H.,Devos, G.(2010).How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers' organizational commitment? A qualitative study.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(3),565-575.
  23. Hulpia, H.,Devos, G.,Rosseel, Y.(2009).The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers' and teacher leaders' job satisfaction and organizational commitment.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,20(3),291-317.
  24. Jame, K. T.(Ed.),Collins, J.(Ed.)(2008).Leadership perspectives: Knowledge into action.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Jameson, J.(2006).Leadership in post compulsory education.London:David Fulton.
  26. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:The Guilford Press.
  27. Marsh, H. W.,Hocevar, D.(1985).Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups.Psychological Bulletin,97(3),562-582.
  28. Martarano, J.(Ed.),Gosling, J.(Ed.)(2008).Leadership: The key concepts.London:Routledge.
  29. Mascall, B.,Leithwood, K.,Straus, T.,Sacks, R.(2008).The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers' academic optimism.Journal of Educational Administration,46(2),214-228.
  30. Maxwell, G.,Scheurich, J.,Skrla, L.(2009).Distributed leadership includes staff: One rural custodian as a case.Journal of School Leadership,19(4),466-496.
  31. Mayrowetz, D.(2008).Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field.Educational Administration Quarterly,44(3),424-435.
  32. McDonald, R. P.,Ho, M. R.(2002).Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis.Psychological Methods,7(1),64-82.
  33. Nguni, S.,Sleegers, P.,Denessen, E.(2006).Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers' job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,17(2),145-177.
  34. Noar, S. M.(2003).The role of structural equation modeling in scale development.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,17(1),173-189.
  35. Pearce, C. J.,Conger, C.(2003).Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  36. Reinhartz, J.,Beach, D. M.(2004).Educational leadership: Changing schools, changing roles.Boston, MA:Pearson.
  37. Ritchie, R.,Woods, P. A.(2007).Degrees of distribution: Towards an understanding of variations in the nature of distributed leadership in schools.Journal of School Leadership & Management,27(4),363-381.
  38. Rosenbach, W. E.(Ed.),Taylor, R. L.(Ed.)(2006).Contemporary issues in leadership.Boulder, CO:Westview.
  39. Saadi, A. M.,Hussain, A.,Bhutta, R. N.,Perveen, N.,Kazmi, U. K.,Ahmad, N.(2009).Democratic and distributed leadership for school improvement: Case studies from Pakistan.The International Journal of Learning,16(2),521-532.
  40. Spillane, J. P.(2005).Distributed leadership.The Educational Forum,69(2),143-150.
  41. Spillane, J. P.(2006).Distributed leadership.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  42. Spillane, J. P.,Camburn, E. M.,Pareja, A.(2007).Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal's work day.Leadership and Policy in School,6(1),103-25.
  43. Spillane, J. P.,Halverson, R.,Diamond, J.(2004).Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective.Journal of Curriculum Studies,36(1),3-34.
  44. Spillane, J. P.,Healey, K.(2010).Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective.The Elementary School Journal,111(2),253-281.
  45. Storey, A.(2004).The problem of distributed leadership in schools.School Leadership and Management,24(3),249-265.
  46. Wallace, M.(2002).Modeling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary School senior management teams in England and Wales.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,13(2),163-186.
  47. Yukl, G.(2002).Leadership in organizations.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  48. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。臺北:高等教育。
  49. 李藹慈、侯貴孾(2007)。主管轉型領導、學習型組織與組織績效之相關研究─以國立社教機構為例。成人及終身教育學刊,8,37-70。
  50. 邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式:LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用。臺北:雙葉。
  51. 邱皓政(2012)。量化研究法。臺北:雙葉。
  52. 秦夢群(2010)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北:五南。
  53. 黃宗顯(2008)。學校領導:新理論與實踐。臺北:五南。
  54. 黃芳銘(2002)。結構方程模式─理論與應用。臺北:五南。
  55. 蔡進雄(2000)。轉型領導與學校效能。臺北:師大書苑。
  56. 蔡進雄(2005)。領導新典範:後英雄式領導的意涵及其對學校行政領導的啟示。教育政策論壇,7(1),111-130。
  57. 賴志峰(2009)。中小學分佈式領導風格量表之檢證。初等教育學刊,34,25-52。
  58. 賴志峰(2008)。分佈式領導理論之探究─學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報,20,87-113。
  59. 顧為元(2008)。轉型領導對組織公民行為影響之研究:以組織承諾為中介變項。教育與心理研究,31(1),205-231。
被引用次数
  1. 陳玄康,何高志(2023)。以校長分佈式領導提升工作滿意度之策略。學校行政,144,83-103。
  2. 廖珮妏(2022)。從分散式領導角色探討大學社會責任形塑個案科大特色亮點之創新組織特性研究。修平學報,43,165-193。
  3. 劉鎮寧(2020)。國民小學校長與教師領導者的協作教學領導個案研究。教育實踐與研究,33(1),33-69。
  4. 潘慧玲,許筠萱(2019)。分散性領導在推動學習共同體中的實踐:以一所國中國文教師學習社群為案例。學校行政,119,197-214。
  5. 阮光勛(2023)。科層體制下的教師領導︰國小教學組長的經驗。清華教育學報,40(1),45-84。
  6. 謝傳崇,翁暄睿(2019)。TALIS 2018年臺灣國小校長分布式領導調查結果之分析。學校行政,124,1-20。
  7. 鐘巧如,陳建志(2014)。當代分布式領導在教育領導之發展與應用。教育研究與發展期刊,10(3),1-24。
  8. (2014)。國民中、小學分布式領導層面之建構與驗證。中正教育研究,13(2),29-69。
  9. (2016)。高級中等學校分布式領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究,39(2),1-25。
  10. (2019)。國民小學校長專業學習社群指標系統之建構。教育與心理研究,42(4),1-32。
  11. (2021)。國民中學教師正向領導指標系統之建構。教育行政與評鑑學刊,30,1-32。
  12. (2022)。臺北市公立國民中學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與教師組織承諾關係之研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊,32,79-116。