採用多元教學策略的非制式奈米課程對國中生情境興趣之促進

Promoting Junior High Students' Situational Interests with Multiple Teaching Strategies in Informal Nanometer-Related Curricula

鄭瑞洲(Jui-Chou Cheng)；洪振方(Jeng-Fung Hung)；黃台珠(Tai-Chu Huang)

非制式奈米教學 ； 情境興趣 ； 教學策略 ； informal nanometer-related curriculum ； situational interest ； teaching strategy

教育實踐與研究

26卷2期（2013 / 12 / 01）

1 - 28

繁體中文

Student interest plays a vital role in science learning. In particular, junior high students in Taiwan showed higher interest in informal than formal science learning. Thus, this study investigated the relationship of junior high students' situational interest and multiple teaching strategies in informal nanometer-related curricula and the source of situational interest. Two questionnaires were administered to 110 students and semi-structured interviews of selected students were conducted. The results showed that after implementing multiple teaching strategies in informal nanometer-related curricula, the junior high school students' situational interest increased, especially for low-level interest student group. The findings suggested that the students perceived the following teaching strategies to have helped enhanced their situational interests: hands-on activity, teaching aids demonstration, providing examples from daily life, and multi-media presentation; by contrast, the ”question and discussion” teaching strategy was regarded to have a lesser effect in promoting situational interest for lower-level student group as compared to the higher-level student group. The results of the interview showed that while involving in ”hands-on laboratory work,” students felt a sense of novelty, instant enjoyment, meaningfulness, exploration, understanding, and achievement, which contributed to enhancing their situational interest. The findings suggested that teachers should adopt various teaching strategies for students with different levels to enhance student's situational interest.

Student interest plays a vital role in science learning. In particular, junior high students in Taiwan showed higher interest in informal than formal science learning. Thus, this study investigated the relationship of junior high students' situational interest and multiple teaching strategies in informal nanometer-related curricula and the source of situational interest. Two questionnaires were administered to 110 students and semi-structured interviews of selected students were conducted. The results showed that after implementing multiple teaching strategies in informal nanometer-related curricula, the junior high school students' situational interest increased, especially for low-level interest student group. The findings suggested that the students perceived the following teaching strategies to have helped enhanced their situational interests: hands-on activity, teaching aids demonstration, providing examples from daily life, and multi-media presentation; by contrast, the ”question and discussion” teaching strategy was regarded to have a lesser effect in promoting situational interest for lower-level student group as compared to the higher-level student group. The results of the interview showed that while involving in ”hands-on laboratory work,” students felt a sense of novelty, instant enjoyment, meaningfulness, exploration, understanding, and achievement, which contributed to enhancing their situational interest. The findings suggested that teachers should adopt various teaching strategies for students with different levels to enhance student's situational interest.

1. 余民寧、韓珮華(2009)。教學方式對數學學習興趣與數學成就之影響：以TIMSS 2003台灣資料為例。測驗學刊，56(1)，19-48。
   連結：
2. 張靜儀(2005)。國小自然科教學個案研究─以ARCS 動機模式解析。科學教育學刊，13(2)，191-216。
   連結：
3. 曾國鴻、陳沅(2005)。國小師生對奈米科技之熟悉度、學習需求及其融入課程研究。科學教育學刊，13(1)，101-120。
   連結：
4. Efthimiou, C., Llewellyn, R., Maronde, D., & Winningham, T. (2006). Physics in films: An assessment, Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0609154
5. Renninger, K. A. (2007). Interest and motivation in informal science learning. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/Renninger_Commissioned_Paper.pdf
6. Badura, A. S.(2002).Capturing students' attention: Movie clips set the stage for learning in abnormal psychology.Teaching of Psychology,29,58-60.
7. Chang, R. P. H.(2006).A call for nanoscience education.Nanotoday,1(2),6-7.
8. Chen, A.,Darst, P. W.,Pangrazi, R. P.(2001).An examination of situational interest and its sources.British Journal of Educational Psychology,71,383-400.
9. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.).Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
10. Durik, A. M.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2007).Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest.Journal of Educational Psychology,99,597-610.
11. Foley, B. J.,McPhee, C.(2008).Students' attitudes towards science in classes using hands-on or textbook based curriculum.the meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New York, NY.:
12. George, D.,Mallery, P.(2003).SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.).Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
13. Greenfield, T. A.(1997).Gender-and Grade-level differences in science interest and participation.Science Education,81,259-276.
14. Hidi, S.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2000).Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century.Review of Educational Research,70,151-179.
15. Hidi, S.,Renninger, K. A.(2006).The four-phase model of interest development.Educational Psychologist,41,111-127.
16. Hoffmann, L.(2002).Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners.Learning and Instruction,12,447-465.
17. Hooper-Greenhill, E.(2007).Museums and education: Purpose, pedagogy, performance.London, UK:Taylor & Francis.
18. Hutchinson, K.,Bodner, G. M.,Bryan, L.(2011).Middle- and high-school students'interest in nanoscale science and engineering topics and phenomena.Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER),1(1),4.
19. Krapp, A.(2005).Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations.Learning and Instruction,15,381-395.
20. Krapp, A.(2002).Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective.Learning and Instruction,12,383-409.
21. Laursen, S.,Liston, C.,Thiry, H.,Graf, J.(2007).What good is a scientist in the classroom? Participant outcomes and program design features for a short-duration science outreach intervention in K-12 classrooms.CBE-Life Sciences Education,6(1),49-64.
22. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L.,Durik, A. M.,Conley, A. M.,Barron, K. E.,Tauer, J. M.,Karabenick, S. A.,Harackiewicz, J. M.(2010).Measuring situational interest in academic domains.Educational and Psychological Measurement,70(4),647-671.
23. Mitchell, M.(1993).Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology,85,424-436.
24. Mitchell, M.(1997).Situational interest in the statistics classroom.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Chicago, IL.:
25. Moon, J.(Ed.)(2005).Informal Science Research.Washington, DC:Board on Science Education, National Academy of Science.
26. Neathery, M. F.(1997).Elementary and secondary students' perceptions toward science and correlation with gender, ethnicity, ability, grade, and science achievement.Electronic Journal of Science Education,2(1)
27. Pintrich, P. R.,Schunk, D. H.(1996).Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.).Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Merrill Company.
28. Renninger, K. A.(Ed.),Hidi, S.(Ed.),Krapp, A.(Ed.)(1992).The role of interest in learning and development.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.Associates, Inc..
29. Renninger, K. A.,Hidi, S.(2011).Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest.Educational Psychologist,46,168-184.
30. Renninger, K. A.,Hidi, S.,Krapp, A.(1992).The role of interest in learning and development.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Ryan, R.(Ed.)(2012).Oxford Handbook of Motivation.New York:Oxford University Press.
32. Schiefele, U.(1991).Interest, learning, and motivation.Educational Psychologist,26,299-323.
33. Schraw, G.,Lehman, S.(2001).Situational interest: A review of the literature and discussions for future research.Educational Psychology Review,13,23-52.
34. Shen, B.,Chen, A.,Guan, J.(2007).Using achievement goals and interest to predict learning in physical education.Journal of Experimental Education,75,89-108.
35. Stipek, D. J.(2002).Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (4th ed.).Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
36. Stocklmayer, S. M.,Rennie, L. J.,Gilbert, J. K.(2010).The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education.Studies in Science Education,46(1),1-44.
37. Stohr-Hunt, P. M.(1996).An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33,101-109.
38. Wolk, S.(2007).Why go to school?.Phi Delta Kappan,88(9),648-658.
39. 何宗穎、鄭瑞洲、謝佩妤、陳東煌、黃台珠(2012)。非制式奈米科學教學提升中小學學生科學學習興趣之研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，65，1-26。
40. 李世光、吳政忠、蔡雅雯、林宜靜、黃圓婷(2003)。奈米科技人才培育計畫之推動規劃與展望：從K-12 奈米人才培育試行計劃談起。物理雙月刊，25(3)，435-443。
41. 李哲迪(2009)。臺灣國中學生在TIMSS 及PISA 的科學學習成果表現及其啟示。研習資訊，26(2)，73-88。
42. 李登隆、王美芬(2004)。資訊融入專題導向學習對國小學生自然科學習態度與問題解決能力之影響。科學教育研究與發展季刊，2004 專刊，69-94。
43. 邱美虹(2005)。TIMSS 2003 臺灣國中二年級學生的科學成就及相關因素之探討。科學教育月刊，282，2-40。
44. 教育部(2003)。科學教育白皮書。臺北市:教育部。
45. 蔡元福、吳佳瑾、胡焯淳(2004)。奈米科技融入自然與生活科技領域教學之初探。科學教育研究與發展季刊，35，39-50。
46. 鄭瑞洲、洪振方、黃台珠(2011)。情境興趣─制式與非正式課程科學學習的交會點。科學教育月刊，340，2-10。

1. Tsai, Rung-Ching,Lu, Tsui-Shan,Lin, Ke-Chian(2018).Accounting for Careless Responding in Survey Questionnaires with a Bogus Item and Response Time.測驗學刊,65(4),439-463.
2. 董曜瑜、洪嘉駿、施昆易、王淑卿、王國華(2018)。一個混成式案例教學模式應用於非正式科學師資培育之成效：由學習參與和學習感受觀點。科學教育學刊，26(2)，171-196。
3. 黃美珠,陳玉麟(2022)。改良式管顧練習個案教學法對學生批判性思考意向與學習興趣的影響。臺大管理論叢，32(3)，35-77。
4. 靳知勤、楊惟程(2018)。以故事情境策略營造美感體驗對不同學習成就國小學生學習成效之影響研究。科學教育學刊，26(3)，219-239。
5. 錢昭萍、梁麗珍(2017)。多元教學對不同學院與性別的學生學習態度與學習成效之影響—以科技大學大一國文課為例。人文社會學報，13(3)，219-249。
6. 宋世祥,王佳琪(2019)。設計思考融入職前師資培育課程之實施與成效：以適性教學為例。教育科學研究期刊，64(4)，145-173。
7. 閻映丞,陳玫岑(2019)。觀眾對奈米科技認知與情意探討：以奈米特展為場域。科技與人力教育季刊，5(3)，1-32。
8. 張懷綾,金凱儀(2020)。行動式擴增實境學習系統對情境興趣與學習成效之影響性：以戶外古蹟導覽教育課程為例。數位學習科技期刊，12(3)，89-115。
9. 張世聰(2020)。樂趣化教學法在運動成就動機、流暢體驗與擊球表現之研究－以大學網球課為例。運動休閒管理學報，17(2)，1-17。
10. (2024)。非制式化學課程教學對中小學生元素概念及情境興趣之影響。科技博物，28(3)，5-34。