以異業合作的行動研究發展校長專業增能課程

The Development of Professional Empowerment Program for Principals by Interorganizational Collaboration and Action Research

陳佩英(Pei-Ying Chen)；林子斌(Tzu-Bin Lin)

行動研究 ； 校長專業發展 ； 校長領導 ； 異業合作 ； action research ； interorganizational collaboration ； professional development for principals

教育實踐與研究

28卷1期（2015 / 06 / 01）

131 - 166

繁體中文

本研究以異業合作的行動研究模式發展校長領導之專業增能課程，此增能課程已實施兩年，本文主要說明2012年之校長培力工作坊之課程設計、實施情形和效果，並探討學校領導異業合作模式之意義和效果。課程分三階段進行：課程設計、課程實施、和課程反思與修訂。課程設計階段，首先透過文獻分析與焦點團體訪談，歸納國內外校長領導專業之關鍵能力，再進行課程設計。課程設計強調異業合作，結合了大學、教育主管單位、學校、與社會企業。歷經一年多的討論與規劃，擬定出四天課程，包括：黑暗中的領導自覺與團隊合作、趨勢領導、課程與教學領導、系統思考與策略發展、逆向課程概念與設計、和深度匯談與反思等。校長培力工作坊課程於2012年暑假辦理兩梯次，實施期間以社群網站進行形成性評估以掌握學員的學習情形。工作坊後進行課程的檢討與反思，包括學員回饋、學者回饋、課程設計參與者的回饋與反思，並提出內容與實施方式的挑戰與修訂建議。本行動研究為校長專業增能課程進行「設計－實施－反饋－修訂」之循環，使課程內涵與實施方式更趨成熟，並且發展出校長和未來領導人才的情境學習、合作與反思的新式專業增能模式。

As an action research approach through interorganizational collaboration, this study aims to develop an effective professional learning program for enhancing principals' leadership. There are three phases in this research: program design, implementation, and feedback and reflection. With a comprehensive literature review and focus group interviews, key competences of leadership were identified. The program contents were designed through interorganizational collaboration between academics, local officers, experienced principals, and NGO practitioners. The program contains self-awareness and team building in the dark, leading for the future, curriculum and instructional leadership, systems thinking, Understanding by Design, framework and practice, and World Café dialogue. In Phase II, a four-day workshop program has been held twice in the summer of 2012. Learning feedback was posted on Facebook as informal formative evaluation during the implementation phase. In phase III, opinions and feedbacks from learners, external observers, and curriculum designers were collected to assess the effectiveness of the program. The challenges and revision ideas were proposed at the end of the paper. Through the cycle of ＂design-act-feedback-revision＂ of action research with interorganizational collaboration, the present professional development program for principals can be refined and better empower school leaders with new ways of situated learning, collaboration, and reflective thinking. Although this program has been implemented for a few times in the past two years, this paper only explained and discussed the merits and effects of the workshops implemented in the summer of 2012.

1. 林佩璇(2002)。行動研究在課程發展中的理念與實踐。課程與教學季刊，5(2)，81-96。
   連結：
2. 陳木金(2009)。我國國民小學校長儲訓模式的回顧與展望。學校行政雙月刊，60，98-120。
   連結：
3. 蔡清田(2007)。課程行動研究的實踐之道。課程與教學季刊，10(3)，75-90。
   連結：
4. National College for Teaching and Leadership (2014). Professional development for school leaders. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/professional-development-for-school-leaders
5. Crow, G. M. (2002). School leader preparation: A short review of the knowledge base. Retrieved from http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~mujinc/teaching/9-101principal/refer1-1(randd-gary-crowpaper).pdf
6. NIE (2012). Leaders in education programme. Retrieved from http://www.nie.edu.sg/studynie/leadership-programmes/leaders-education-programme
7. National College for School Leadership (2012). NPQH modules. Retrieved from http://www.nationalcollege.org.uk/index/professional-development/npqh/npqh-programme-details/npqh-modules.htm
8. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2012). National board certification for principals: Redefining educational leadership for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/products_and_services/national_board_certifica
9. Carr, W.,Kemmis, S.(1986).Becoming critical: Knowing through action research.London, UK:Falmer.
10. Chen, A. Y.(ed.),Koay, S. L.(ed.)(2010).Transforming teaching, inspiring learning.Singapore:National Institute of Education Singapore.
11. Cheng, Y. C.(2011).Towards the 3rd wave school leadership.Revista de Investigacion Educativa,29(2),253-275.
12. DfES(2004).National standards for headteachers.
13. Dimmock, C.,Lee, J. C. -K.(2000).Redesigning school-based curriculum leadership: A cross-cultural perspective.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,15(4),332-358.
14. Fullan, M.(2007).The new meaning of educational change.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
15. Hallinger, P.(2011).Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research.Journal of Educational Administration,49(2),125-142.
16. Hallinger, P.(ed.)(2003).Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective.Lisse, the Netherlands:Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
17. Hallinger, P.,Heck, R. H.(2010).Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning.School Leadership & Management,30(2),95-110.
18. Harris, A.(2013).Distributed leadership friend or foe?.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,41(5),545-554.
19. Kemmis, S.(ed.)(1981).The action research reader.Victoria, Australia:Deakin University Press.
20. Kolb, D. A.(1976).Management and the learning process.California Management Review,18(3),21-31.
21. Lin, T. -B.,Chen, P.(2014).In search of solution to improve school effectiveness: A case study of leadership preparation program in Taipei.The International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement Annual Conference 2014 (CD-ROM),Yogyakarta, Indonesia:
22. Murphy, J.,Smylie, M.,Mayrowetz, D.,Louis, K. S.(2009).The role of the principal in fostering the development of distributed leadership.School Leadership & Management,29(2),181-214.
23. Murphy, J.,Vriesenga, M.(2006).Research on school leadership preparation in the United States: An analysis.School Leadership & Management,26(2),183-195.
24. Ng, P. T.(2008).Developing forward‐looking and innovative school leaders: The Singapore leaders in education programme.Journal of In-Service Education,34(2),237-255.
25. NIE(2011).Leaders in education programme, 2011: Handbook for participants.The Conference of Leaders in Education Programme, 2011,Singapore:
26. Orphanos, S.,Orr, M. T.(2014).Learning leadership matters: The influence of innovative school leadership preparation on teachers' experiences and outcomes.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,42(5),680-700.
27. Pang, S. K.(2007).Continuing the professional development of principals in Hong Kong.Frontier of Education in China,2(4),605-619.
28. Robinson, V. M. J.,Lloyd, C. A.,Rowe, K. J.(2008).The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types.Educational Administration Quarterly,44(5),635-674.
29. 中國教育學會編(2012)。2020 教育願景。臺北=Taipei:學富文化=Proed。
30. 林文律(1999)。從校長必備能力看校長培育。教育資料與研究雙月刊，28，7-13。
31. 林海清(2000)。從校長培育與專業發展看校長證照制度。教育資料與研究，37，21-25。
32. 徐佳豪(2008)。透過異業合作達到價值創造：矽太陽光電產業分析。臺灣經濟研究月刊，31(7)，66-75。
33. 國立臺中教育大學教育學系暨課程與教學研究所編(2008)。校長專業成長：培育、領導與在職進修。臺北=Taipei:冠學文化=Great Scholar Publishing。
34. 張德銳、簡賢昌、丁一顧(2006)。中小學優秀校長專業發展歷程之研究。教育政策論壇，9(1)，149-176。
35. 教育署(2002)。校長持續專業發展指引。香港=Hong Kong:教育署=Education Bureau。
36. 陳木金、陳宏彰(2006)。NPQH 模式系統對我國校長培訓系統建構之啟示。教育研究月刊，142，69-89。
37. 陳世哲、劉春榮(2005)。我國中小學校長培育之現況與展望─以臺北市立師範學院校長培育班為例。教育研究月刊，129，61-78。
38. 陳宏彰(2005)。臺北市=Taipei，國立政治大學教育研究所=Department of Education, National Chengchi University。
39. 彭新強(2011)。全球化衝擊下香港校長培訓的專業發展。第二屆全國中小學校長培訓專業化研究論壇，北京=Beijing:
40. 鄭崇趁(2012)。教育經營學：六說、七略、八要。臺北=Taipei:心理出版社=Psychological Publishing。
41. 鄭燕祥(2004)。教育領導與改革：新範式。臺北=Taipei:高等教育出版=High Education。
42. 謝千柔(2009)。新竹市=Hsinchu，國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系=Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, National Tsing Hua University。

1. 蔡明學、黃建翔(2016)。國民小學校長校務經營關鍵影響因素之探究。教育研究與發展期刊，12(3)，131-164。
2. 林志成,周雯娟(2021)。專業學習社群領導智慧之探究。學校行政，131，1-21。
3. 林子斌(2017)。見樹也見林的問題解決工具：系統思考在臺灣中等教育的可能性與挑戰。中等教育，68(4)，8-15。
4. 劉藍芳、洪啟昌、林信志(2017)。國小校長專業發展實驗課程之探究：蘇格拉底對話法之應用。教育科學期刊，16(1)，131-156。
5. 孫宇安、林子斌(2017)。遊戲中學系統思考：以國中之課程領導增能課程為例。中等教育，68(4)，36-53。
6. (2019)。國民小學校長專業學習社群指標系統之建構。教育與心理研究，42(4)，1-32。
7. (2019)。臺灣校長領導作為之國際比較：TALIS 2018調查資料之應用。教育研究月刊，308，1-4。
8. (2020)。變革社會中國民中小學校長專業發展之研究：以南投縣校長專業發展輔導團為例。教育政策論壇，23(3)，67-100。
9. (2021)。素養導向之校長專業指標建構：模糊德菲法與IDA之應用。教育研究月刊，325，52-70。